Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XXVI

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure the fact that we got a 2nd for Lias from an organization his Dad works for is no small coincidence. I really doubt we'll be so lucky with VK, especially considering he has less NHL experience. Not saying Lias is a better player by any means, but we would be lucky to get a 2nd for him at this time.

A 1 for 1 reclamation project as Edge mentioned is probably our best bet here.
Absolutely see a team that has minimal cap space and a need ( maybe due to injuries) to gamble and give up a 2nd rd pick for him.
Teams like EDM, Tor etc
Some bad teams might take a flyer as well such as Buff/Ari just to give him minutes and see if he can fit in terms or their rebuilds. Especially since those teams are devoid of high end talent.
Can absolutely see Granato running a Cozens/Kravtsov or Middlestadt/Kravtsov duo hoping to catch lightning in a bottle.
If Drury can’t get a high enough draft pick, I’d then expect him to go the reclamation prospect route on a 1 for 1.
Anyone who thinks we’re getting a 1st rd pick, even a late one for Kravtsov now with all that’s transpired, is off their meds.

Bern is going to have a whole new bag of ridiculous proposals now, but that’s to be expected
 
Last edited:
I am concerned that the team is deciding to eschew rationality and try to out-heavy everyone just because the Lightning had one grit line and because the Islanders stole our lunch with a bunch of thirty two year old trapping goons.

Skill and speed still win in this league. It can't be exclusively skill and speed but we now have enough grit, yet there seems to be no end in sight of the organization running off their talent in favor of grinders.

...

Again, I said this earlier, there is all this spin about how "Kravtsov wasn't one of our top 4 RWs," after camp but I don't buy that at all.

This is what happened, if I had to guess:

- The team traded Buch "for the cap savings," which it did need, but absolutely, 100% because it also knew it needed to open up playing time for Kravtsov or otherwise this would happen again. There's no way they didn't know. They were also in on Eichel, and my guess is that they still are, which is why Buch was moved for bottom 6 grit and not a top 6 center prospect (another flaw in this whole process being, they've irrevocably decided to win now at the expense of winning later, and won't consider a trade that they win the value exchange if it doesn't mean they can't fortify this year's team, which is a moronic approach).

- Gallant gets into the building and looks over the roster, which probably had not FULLY happened at the time of the Buch trade, as that decision was a Drury/Dolan decision. Gallant implements his "I don't want kids playing on the fourth line," credo. After roster analysis, and perhaps with pressure from players like Kreider himself or other vets who do not share concern for "the future," (which is why vets shouldn't be making these decisions), Gallant decides that the best course of action is not to automatically slot Kravtsov into the 2RW role but rather to try Kreider there first, as otherwise, Kreider is relegated to overpaid third line LWer. My take is that this is a perfect spot for Kreider if you disregard his salary: He's a borderline first liner who'd be absolutely devouring third line competition, which would finally make him a net positive in all situations. He'd be a matchup nightmare there, and he'd fit well on a size line with Chytil and Goodrow. Instead, for whatever reason, Gallant wants him out of position on the second line. Favoritism for vested veterans isn't an implausible explanation.

- With Kreider getting the first look at 2RW, the opening for Kravtsov to play a skill game in the top 6 has evaporated. Whatever promises or agreements had been made at the exit interviews from last season are no longer applicable, and Drury has to keep his promises to Dolan to "get tougher to play against," over keeping any promises to Kravtsov that he'd get a fair look in the top 9. As the "get tougher," mandate was in effect, and Kravtsov not slotted into 2RW because Kreider got "first dibs," due to his veteran status and the team not wanting to pay $6m to a third liner, Kravtsov had to win a job on the third line, but that line is designated for grit duty now. Kravtsov can't earn a slot on that line if he's not willing to do the dirty work, which, to his own fault, as a prima donna, he has no real interest in.

- Camp comes and goes, and for the role they want for their third line wings (heavy), Blais obviously outplays him, as does Hunt. Regardless, once Blais outplays him, he has no more spot because Gallant "isn't going to play kids on the fourth line," (with some good reason).

- Gallant realizes this is a pending disaster, and so gets out ahead of it with "Well, if the Kreider thing doesn't work, I'm willing to move Kravtsov up to the top 6 again." He's hedging for trying to signal to Kravtsov he has a future here and also because who the heck knows if the inconsistent Kreider is actually going to work out of position on the right side, long term.

- But it's all too late, and the damage has been done. Kreider was given first dibs at 2RW, the roster was engineered to be heavier in the bottom instead of skilled, and Gallant won't keep Kravtsov up to get fourth line minutes. Nobody is changing their positions, so Kravtsov doesn't want to change his stance either. And now we have this standoff where his value is also in the toilet and we can't get back a useful piece for him. To make matters worse, the team threatens to (or actually does?) suspend him for his non compliance like hardasses, instead of trying to sit down and work something out with him.

I mean, it's North American sports in a sport that is relatively conservative compared to the other major sports leagues. Of course the "pay your dues," mantra is prevalent. But as others have pointed out, Kravtsov is from like Kamchatka and maybe his European (Asian?) mindset differs from North Americans. I'm not saying he should get a free pass, but it's definitely concerning that there has been no leeway given.

And yeah, this results in a situation where I think we are staring in the face the possibility that we are not going to be fast enough and skilled enough. We aren't gritty enough to out-gritty the Islanders but we aren't skilled enough to keep up with the most skilled teams. We've tried to mimic two approaches and as a result we're not going to excel at either.

This is something else.
 
I kind of like the idea of a Kravtsov-Hayton swap but is Arizona actually thinking about moving him? He would also have to really work to get a spot as well, don't even see him beating out Rooney at the moment let alone Chytil. I just hope we can work some sort of magic like we did with Ryan Strome

pretty sure Hayton can play the wing too so there’s a spot

likely would stay in Hartford for a bit if Picked up
 
I kind of like the idea of a Kravtsov-Hayton swap but is Arizona actually thinking about moving him? He would also have to really work to get a spot as well, don't even see him beating out Rooney at the moment let alone Chytil. I just hope we can work some sort of magic like we did with Ryan Strome

I think Hayton has a clearer opening next year when Strome is likely gone. Or, as has been talked about, with Kravtsov out of the picture, perhaps Chytil moves to RW.
 
Play wrong for Shane Wright?

I'm not suggesting tanking.

I'm suggesting that if something did go wrong this year and we missed the playoffs and won a lottery, that might ultimately be the best outcome for us.

I think we are short one or two skilled forwards for the long haul still, if we want to win Cups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBloodyNine
I am concerned that the team is deciding to eschew rationality and try to out-heavy everyone just because the Lightning had one grit line and because the Islanders stole our lunch with a bunch of thirty two year old trapping goons.

Skill and speed still win in this league. It can't be exclusively skill and speed but we now have enough grit, yet there seems to be no end in sight of the organization running off their talent in favor of grinders.

...

Again, I said this earlier, there is all this spin about how "Kravtsov wasn't one of our top 4 RWs," after camp but I don't buy that at all.

This is what happened, if I had to guess:

- The team traded Buch "for the cap savings," which it did need, but absolutely, 100% because it also knew it needed to open up playing time for Kravtsov or otherwise this would happen again. There's no way they didn't know. They were also in on Eichel, and my guess is that they still are, which is why Buch was moved for bottom 6 grit and not a top 6 center prospect (another flaw in this whole process being, they've irrevocably decided to win now at the expense of winning later, and won't consider a trade that they win the value exchange if it doesn't mean they can't fortify this year's team, which is a moronic approach).

- Gallant gets into the building and looks over the roster, which probably had not FULLY happened at the time of the Buch trade, as that decision was a Drury/Dolan decision. Gallant implements his "I don't want kids playing on the fourth line," credo. After roster analysis, and perhaps with pressure from players like Kreider himself or other vets who do not share concern for "the future," (which is why vets shouldn't be making these decisions), Gallant decides that the best course of action is not to automatically slot Kravtsov into the 2RW role but rather to try Kreider there first, as otherwise, Kreider is relegated to overpaid third line LWer. My take is that this is a perfect spot for Kreider if you disregard his salary: He's a borderline first liner who'd be absolutely devouring third line competition, which would finally make him a net positive in all situations. He'd be a matchup nightmare there, and he'd fit well on a size line with Chytil and Goodrow. Instead, for whatever reason, Gallant wants him out of position on the second line. Favoritism for vested veterans isn't an implausible explanation.

- With Kreider getting the first look at 2RW, the opening for Kravtsov to play a skill game in the top 6 has evaporated. Whatever promises or agreements had been made at the exit interviews from last season are no longer applicable, and Drury has to keep his promises to Dolan to "get tougher to play against," over keeping any promises to Kravtsov that he'd get a fair look in the top 9. As the "get tougher," mandate was in effect, and Kravtsov not slotted into 2RW because Kreider got "first dibs," due to his veteran status and the team not wanting to pay $6m to a third liner, Kravtsov had to win a job on the third line, but that line is designated for grit duty now. Kravtsov can't earn a slot on that line if he's not willing to do the dirty work, which, to his own fault, as a prima donna, he has no real interest in.

- Camp comes and goes, and for the role they want for their third line wings (heavy), Blais obviously outplays him, as does Hunt. Regardless, once Blais outplays him, he has no more spot because Gallant "isn't going to play kids on the fourth line," (with some good reason).

- Gallant realizes this is a pending disaster, and so gets out ahead of it with "Well, if the Kreider thing doesn't work, I'm willing to move Kravtsov up to the top 6 again." He's hedging for trying to signal to Kravtsov he has a future here and also because who the heck knows if the inconsistent Kreider is actually going to work out of position on the right side, long term.

- But it's all too late, and the damage has been done. Kreider was given first dibs at 2RW, the roster was engineered to be heavier in the bottom instead of skilled, and Gallant won't keep Kravtsov up to get fourth line minutes. Nobody is changing their positions, so Kravtsov doesn't want to change his stance either. And now we have this standoff where his value is also in the toilet and we can't get back a useful piece for him. To make matters worse, the team threatens to (or actually does?) suspend him for his non compliance like hardasses, instead of trying to sit down and work something out with him.

I mean, it's North American sports in a sport that is relatively conservative compared to the other major sports leagues. Of course the "pay your dues," mantra is prevalent. But as others have pointed out, Kravtsov is from like Kamchatka and maybe his European (Asian?) mindset differs from North Americans. I'm not saying he should get a free pass, but it's definitely concerning that there has been no leeway given.

And yeah, this results in a situation where I think we are staring in the face the possibility that we are not going to be fast enough and skilled enough. We aren't gritty enough to out-gritty the Islanders but we aren't skilled enough to keep up with the most skilled teams. We've tried to mimic two approaches and as a result we're not going to excel at either.
If you just have skill and speed, we look like last years team. You’ll put together some good performances and highlight reel stuff, but your not going anywhere. You need toughness and size when the play becomes tighter and more physical.
No matter how talented you are, if other teams can impose their will on you physically, you become a target. I’m not saying it had to be all physical. The league has changed a bit in that regard. Your bangers/big guys also need to be capable hockey players as well not like the old day goons.
But if you run a team of just smaller skilled fast players they are going to get beat on.
The other guys in the line up are also going to play small because they don’t feel protected, they don’t feel like their team mates can back them up when things get nasty and other teams take advantage.
It’s not just the lighting. Teams are looking for that Grit/skill combo all over. EDM with Hymann, avs with Kadri, all teams paying for big defenseman that can hit and are mobile,
 
Last edited:
If you just have skill and speed, we look like last years team. You’ll put together some good performances and highlight reel stuff, but your not going anywhere. You need toughness and size when the play becomes tighter and more physical.
No matter how talented you are, if other teams can impose their will on you physically, you become a target. I’m not saying it had to be all physical. The league has changed a bit in that regard. Your bangers/big guys also need to be capable hockey players as well not like the old day goons.

Mind you, this lineup is probably just for tonight's game. I'd be stunned if Lundkvist and Guathier aren't dressing tomorrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jay from jersey
Lol. Krav is done here.
He doesn’t want to be here anymore and this is twice now, first leaving for Russia, and won’t report to A. They aren’t going to welcome him back with open arms.
My guess they’d sooner deal him earlier then later

Sure. Quite possible. They haven't responded to this with a big punitive response or confirmation that they're seeking a trade, though, so maybe we're reading this wrong. Maybe they really want him to apply himself in the AHL. The fact that they just let the agent talk to other teams is kind of a zen response.

If you're a parent of a difficult kid, you may actually have used this technique yourself: you may decide to let the tantrum burn itself out.

Also while Kravtsov has requested a trade he hasn't made an anti-NYR statement and burned this bridge, either.
 
Sure. Quite possible. They haven't responded to this with a big punitive response or confirmation that they're seeking a trade, though, so maybe we're reading this wrong. Maybe they really want him to apply himself in the AHL. The fact that they just let the agent talk to other teams is kind of a zen response.

If you're a parent of a difficult kid, you may actually have used this technique yourself: you may decide to let the tantrum burn itself out.

Also while Kravtsov has requested a trade he hasn't made an anti-NYR statement and burned this bridge, either.
I see what your saying but there’s also a kind of nuisance to it.
I’m assuming the public trade request was leaked from Kravtsovs camp.
He could have just as easily internally requested a trade.
Also not reporting to Hartford is big. It basically bring him wanting out to the forefront affecting the value drury can get for him.
Both those action are a low key public F U to NYR brass.
He could have quietly requested a trade and reported to Hartford for a month or so. If things still had no movement by then, he could have then brought the request publicly
That’s what a professional would have done. These are the actions of a brat kid.
And of course NYR isn’t going to publicly say anything at this point. They don’t want to do anything to damage his value further then it already is, which is bad enough.
The bad blood is there. And it’s on both sides. I don’t see any way back for him to play with NYR ever again
 
If you just have skill and speed, we look like last years team.

But we don't have just skill and speed. We added Goodrow, we added Blais, we added Reaves and Hunt. I'm suggesting we leaned too hard the opposite direction. And despite all that addition of toughness, we couldn't make room for the skill-only Kravtsov, anywhere in the top 9, because we just had to fit all the tough guys in.

This reaction is also missing the forest for the trees. Reaves and Hunts don't really win you hockey games.

What wins you hockey games are Alex Ovechkins and Tom Wilsons, heavy players who also can score 40, 50 points, or 40, 50 goals.

We have two studs who are both thicccc..... Kakko and Lafreniere. Maybe part of our "get harder to play against," goal could have been accomplished by those kids simply not being 19 and 20 anymore, no? Those kids are going to grow into their bodies and be huge pains in the ass to play against eventually.

Those two kids getting tough, as well as Chytil who is also huge, is going to be what wins us games, not Reaves and Hunt.

No matter how talented you are, if other teams can impose their will on you physically, you become a target. I’m not saying it had to be all physical. The league has changed a bit in that regard. Your bangers/big guys also need to be capable hockey players as well not like the old day goons.

You need more skill than toughness. I'm suggesting the Rangers have fulfilled their quota of pure toughness and they have plenty of guys on deck who will be both skilled and tough to play against eventually in Kakko, Laf and Chytil.

The Islanders are an aberration, and they don't win because they are big and tough, they win because they are big and tough and they trap the shit out of everything once they get a one goal lead.
 
I see what your saying but there’s also a kind of nuisance to it.
I’m assuming the public trade request was leaked from Kravtsovs camp.
He could have just as easily internally requested a trade.
Also not reporting to Hartford is big. It basically bring him wanting out to the forefront affecting the value drury can get for him.
Both those action are a low key public F U to NYR brass.
He could have quietly requested a trade and reported to Hartford for a month or so. If things still had no movement by then, he could have then brought the request publicly

I hear you but I'm going to respond with a parenting analogy again: if you want your kid to take swim lessons he may refuse. He may demand to switch families/threaten to live on the street. But you know he needs to learn to swim so you just keep bringing him to the pool until he learns. F U's are a part of this process. For all we know, Kravtsov had a conversation with Drury where he shouted "I hate you I wish you were dead".

I'm not 100% serious, but it's a possibility that NYR has an intention to work through this as much as possible. Also, I'm not clear that there has been damage to his value yet. If this drags on for a while, there certainly will be.
 
I think we should probably let the season play out, before deciding they don't have enough skill. The 4th line has an identity now. The 3rd line looks really good. Who hasnt been impressed with Blais? Lets see how they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TominNC
I hear you but I'm going to respond with a parenting analogy again: if you want your kid to take swim lessons he may refuse. He may demand to switch families/threaten to live on the street. But you know he needs to learn to swim so you just keep bringing him to the pool until he learns. F U's are a part of this process. For all we know, Kravtsov had a conversation with Drury where he shouted "I hate you I wish you were dead".

I'm not 100% serious, but it's a possibility that NYR has an intention to work through this as much as possible. Also, I'm not clear that there has been damage to his value yet. If this drags on for a while, there certainly will be.

I get your analogy. But the parent/kid thing can’t really apply. He can just sit out and not report until traded.
He made these decisions because he doesn’t want to be here anymore. I’m sure his agent warned him of the consequences of going down this path. He chose to walk it anyway because he doesn’t see a future here that’s going to be best for his career going fwd.
I remember a lot of ppl also thought the Lias situation was fixable.
This is actually just as bad or worse
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobSantos
But we don't have just skill and speed. We added Goodrow, we added Blais, we added Reaves and Hunt. I'm suggesting we leaned too hard the opposite direction. And despite all that addition of toughness, we couldn't make room for the skill-only Kravtsov, anywhere in the top 9, because we just had to fit all the tough guys in.

This reaction is also missing the forest for the trees. Reaves and Hunts don't really win you hockey games.

What wins you hockey games are Alex Ovechkins and Tom Wilsons, heavy players who also can score 40, 50 points, or 40, 50 goals.

We have two studs who are both thicccc..... Kakko and Lafreniere. Maybe part of our "get harder to play against," goal could have been accomplished by those kids simply not being 19 and 20 anymore, no? Those kids are going to grow into their bodies and be huge pains in the ass to play against eventually.

Those two kids getting tough, as well as Chytil who is also huge, is going to be what wins us games, not Reaves and Hunt.



You need more skill than toughness. I'm suggesting the Rangers have fulfilled their quota of pure toughness and they have plenty of guys on deck who will be both skilled and tough to play against eventually in Kakko, Laf and Chytil.

The Islanders are an aberration, and they don't win because they are big and tough, they win because they are big and tough and they trap the shit out of everything once they get a one goal lead.

Asking an entitled 21 year old with a whopping two goals in his career to go down to Hartford and work on his game really isn't the end of the world. They have Zib, Strome, Kreider, Panarin, Laff, and Kakko in their top 6. Name me one player Kravtsov (based on his body of work so far) deserves to play over tonight.

I'll answer it for you, NO ONE. He would have been back, he would have gotten his opportunity. He's a baby. Tomorrow night, Lundkvist and Gauthier will probably both be in the lineup. Kravtsov needs to grow a set.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ned Braden
But we don't have just skill and speed. We added Goodrow, we added Blais, we added Reaves and Hunt. I'm suggesting we leaned too hard the opposite direction. And despite all that addition of toughness, we couldn't make room for the skill-only Kravtsov, anywhere in the top 9, because we just had to fit all the tough guys in.

This reaction is also missing the forest for the trees. Reaves and Hunts don't really win you hockey games.

What wins you hockey games are Alex Ovechkins and Tom Wilsons, heavy players who also can score 40, 50 points, or 40, 50 goals.

We have two studs who are both thicccc..... Kakko and Lafreniere. Maybe part of our "get harder to play against," goal could have been accomplished by those kids simply not being 19 and 20 anymore, no? Those kids are going to grow into their bodies and be huge pains in the ass to play against eventually.

Those two kids getting tough, as well as Chytil who is also huge, is going to be what wins us games, not Reaves and Hunt.



You need more skill than toughness. I'm suggesting the Rangers have fulfilled their quota of pure toughness and they have plenty of guys on deck who will be both skilled and tough to play against eventually in Kakko, Laf and Chytil.

The Islanders are an aberration, and they don't win because they are big and tough, they win because they are big and tough and they trap the shit out of everything once they get a one goal lead.
Kravy is stupid. He can see what it is.
Our top 9 has plenty of high end skill locked up now and for the next 5 seasons.
LaF/kakko/panarin/ Zibby/goodrow/kreider isn’t going anywhere for a while.
Chytil/strome is a non issue for him because he’s not a center.
He knows he’s not going to be accommodated on the PP with this in place. He also knows at best with this teams timeline, he’s fighting for a 3RW spot on a team that wants its bottom 6 to be more physical and play a 2-way complete game.
There’s not much more too it then that. The fact is the way we are set up currently and in the next 5!seasons, didn’t bode well for him for playing time. We added some physical guys in Blais/Goodrow capable of middle 6 minutes yes, but that’s not overkill.
Our 4th line sucked as well last year. It needed an overhaul, again that’s no concern to kravtsov because that’s not where he’s going to play
its pretty evident that Gallant wants his 3rd/4th lines to play a heavy 2-way style that’s defensively responsible that causes chaos throwing hits, playing well along the boards, and scoring timely goals.
Drury went out and got those type of players so that they can be inserted immediately, but we also have more coming internally.
 
Last edited:
Asking an entitled 21 year old with a whopping two goals in his career to go down to Hartford and work on his game really isn't the end of the world.

Of course it's not the end of the world. This position you are articulating is a righteous position. No one said the Rangers are wrong for believing this is the best thing.

The Rangers are wrong for not having any flexibility because taking the hard line made the kid run away from home. Shoulda read the tea leaves and deduced that not every human being reacts the same way to the same rigid rules. Exceptions can be made without causing any damage to your system.

They have Zib, Strome, Kreider, Panarin, Laff, and Kakko in their top 6. Name me one player Kravtsov (based on his body of work so far) deserves to play over tonight.

I'll answer it for you, NO ONE. He would have been back, he would have gotten his opportunity. He's a baby. Tomorrow night, Lundkvist and Gauthier will probably both be in the lineup. Kravtsov needs to grow a set.

I highly doubt this reaction was due to this being a paper transaction. He didn't "refuse to report" because they were just designating him for a game, this was an outright assignment to go play in Hartford till we call you back.

That being said I've already articulated why Kreider should be on the third line and why Kravtsov should be playing next to either Strome or Zibanejad.

Number one, constructing a roster isn't some strict pecking order where you always play your best players on the "top line." If so, explain why Panarin is on our second line with Strome and not Zibanejad? It's about fits, not who is best or who has earned it.

My opinion is that Kreider's best fit is on the third line playing his natural LW on a size line with Chytil and Goodrow. This allows Kreider to feast on third line matchups while also being deployed in a way that takes advantage of his size. It also allows an opening for Kravtsov to play a skill role.

By deploying Kreider in the top 6, and keeping the designation of your third line as a heavier line, Kravtsov has nothing to offer that third line and Gallant won't keep him up in the NHL to play fourth line minutes. A redistribution of roles makes a better, well rounded team. It's not about some straight-line "WHO IS BEST," decision.
 
Last edited:
Chytil is centering the 3rd line, gets limited PP time and we've not heard one complaint from him. He accomplished more at this level than Kravtsov ever did and still got sent down the following year. Not one peep. I'll take Chytil on this team over Kravtsov any day of the week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedblue94
Asking an entitled 21 year old with a whopping two goals in his career to go down to Hartford and work on his game really isn't the end of the world. They have Zib, Strome, Kreider, Panarin, Laff, and Kakko in their top 6. Name me one player Kravtsov (based on his body of work so far) deserves to play over tonight.

I'll answer it for you, NO ONE. He would have been back, he would have gotten his opportunity. He's a baby. Tomorrow night, Lundkvist and Gauthier will probably both be in the lineup. Kravtsov needs to grow a set.
He'd have a lot more goals if he had the playing time.

This is the second time that Kravstov's development was paused for the interest of others that required waivers. Last time, Kravtsov gave the Rangers 39 GP in Hartford, making AHL salary before giving up on the season in NA and exercising a clause in his contract.

FO had to see this coming. Kravstov came to camp and by most written accounts, impressed. He should have made the lineup. FO wanted to again exploit the fact that he could be sent to Hartford without waivers. Now it looks like they'll lose him anyways.

This was a 100% unforced and preventable error. They had a whole season to prepare for this. What will we have to show for Kravtsov? Gauthier and Hajek? A couple of 5th round picks?

This is not how you run a serious NHL franchise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
Our top 9 has plenty of high end skill locked up now and for the next 5 seasons.

I don't really agree. Maybe plenty to be a second round playoff exit consistently. But not a multi time Cup winner.

Depends on what Kakko and Laf are. If they are 90+ point players then this is probably true.

If they are only 60 point players then it's false.

He also knows at best with this teams timeline, he’s fighting for a 3RW spot on a team that wants its bottom 6 to be more physical and play a 2-way complete game.

I acknowledged that Kravtsov probably doesn't have interest in developing a heavy game, he wants to play a skill game. His inability to beat out Blais in terms of playing heavy is what cost him a spot, not that Blais is hands down the better player. Better for a checking role.

There’s not much more too it then that. The fact is the way we are set up currently and in the next 5!seasons, didn’t bode well for him for playing time. We added some physical guys in Blais/Goodrow capable of middle 6 minutes yes, but that’s not overkill.

I think we need more skill, so I think it is overkill. Nothing wrong with playing Blais on the fourth line and going with one more skill player in the top 9.

Our 4th line sucked as well last year. It needed an overhaul, again that’s no concern to kravtsov because that’s not where he’s going to play

Yeah, so.... play Blais on the fourth line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad