wafflepadsave
Registered User
I’d be ok if the return is overwhelming but it usually is not!They aren't really considering trading Kreider, are they?
I’d be ok if the return is overwhelming but it usually is not!They aren't really considering trading Kreider, are they?
They aren't really considering trading Kreider, are they?
No, but they might be buyers now that they can’t stop winning.They aren't really considering trading Kreider, are they?
assuming kevin hayes is still around to man center, do the rangers have enough to spend on the below?
LW: panarin, skinner or dzingel
RW: stone, silfverberg, or nyquist
also would it cost about the same amount to sign brock nelson as it would for hayes?
Minnesota might be sellers.Skjei to Minnesota for Jordan Greenway and MIN1.
Buchnevich to Florida for Henrik Borgstrom
These aren't real trades. This is a ruse.Skjei to Minnesota for Jordan Greenway and MIN1.
Minnesota might be sellers.
I heard laughter all the way from south floridaBuchnevich to Florida for Henrik Borgstrom
I heard laughter all the way from south florida
assuming kevin hayes is still around to man center, do the rangers have enough to spend on the below?
LW: panarin, skinner or dzingel
RW: stone, silfverberg, or nyquist
also would it cost about the same amount to sign brock nelson as it would for hayes?
assuming kevin hayes is still around to man center, do the rangers have enough to spend on the below?
LW: panarin, skinner or dzingel
RW: stone, silfverberg, or nyquist
also would it cost about the same amount to sign brock nelson as it would for hayes?
Last game for Hayes, Zuccarello, McQuaid pls.
I would most definitely not call the Islanders “probable” to make the playoffs next year considering the major factor in their record this year is two journeymen goalies putting up a combined.939 sv% at 5v5 and .925 overall.
It is irresponsible to play your big trade chips this close to the deadline. That's on Gorton.I got this feeling that the Rangers aren't going to do what they did at the deadline last year. First--Quinn is not AV and not in the doghouse and his team is not in a state of shellshock (like happened after the letter). Second--McDonagh had been banged up and quite possibly Nash too. Third--the team is actively trying to win games and I don't think Quinn would be pleased. 4th--we're going with 12 forwards and 8 more than less healthy D--the healthy forwards are going to play.
I agree that DeAngelo has looked better on the PP than Shatty, though it's been tough for him recently to carry a unit with little talent on it. When he had Hayes (and Shatty for a stretch, to be fair) with him on the PP2 at the start of the year they were actually the second most dangerous unit in the league in terms of HDCF/60 after the Leafs' PP1. After Hayes was promoted to the first unit Tony hasn't been able to sustain that and for the minutes where he hasn't even had Buch on there the unit has basically not been able to do anything. He's only gotten 10 minutes in total on the PP1 and the results were fantastic, though such a minuscule sample is hard to draw conclusions from.Who has been our best PPQB statistically?
By my eye-test, Pionk of course played there for a while when everything went in, but I do think that TDA is doing the best job when being on it. I think we underrate TDA some, he is playing really good. Think it would show more if we had a better team.
I don't think Shatty is doing a great job on the PP anymore [sic?]. He is OK there, but not great from my POV.