Kakko Schmakko
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2018
- 5,033
- 1,570
Never happen. We'll, I suppose it's theoretically possible but I would bet money it doesn't happen. Once a guy goes he's gone.I would trade Kreider and then possibly re-sign him on July 1st
But that was my argument from the beginning. These were young kids and that having the veteran presence would insulate them and be an insurance policy, for cheap, at the same time. I mean realistically, did we think all of Kravtsov/Lias/Kakko/Chytil would all be playing in the top 9? Because thats where they would have to play, not the 4th, although thats where Lias ended up. Kravtsov went back to russia eventually. Chytil was sent to Hartford. Boyle could have been the 4th line center who moved up and down the lineup as needed with those roster moves and injuries. Yes I hoped all could* make it but nowhere near realistic that they would. And now were paying for it dearly in the standings.
A playoff appearance would be just as vital to the young team’s progression.
And by no means was Boo Nieves was a guarantee.
Yep. Also the cap was a huge issue over the summer.and the Panarin situation had to play out before the team did anything else to fine tune.I would have liked 1 more veteran but that also assumes a veteran would like to sign with a rebuilding team knowing the team has many young players who would get he benefit of the doubt over them all season and likely be traded at the deadline.
Yep. Also the cap was a huge issue over the summer.and the Panarin situation had to play out before the team did anything else to fine tune.
Yep. I think a lot of the potential targets were gone from the bargain bin by the time the Rangers started shopping.And they had a guy in Namestnikov who may have asked for a trade so that didn’t help
I’m not sure if Kreider quite fits into the mold of past desires to just trade someone and hoard picks.
I think there’s a pretty wide understanding of the fiscal implications of the Kreider situation and that simply jettisoning Skjei off the team doesn’t exactly do wonders for a left defense that is already shaky at best.
I think his body is gonna fall apart a couple years into his contract. He's also gonna get north of $5M which isn't what it used to be but also not what I want to spend on Brendan Dillon. His numbers look good at first glance though and I wouldn't be angry about it.What would you think of Brenden Dillon?
And no.Would this be a good deal? Read it on another board
Jeremy Bracco, Dmytro Timashov, and a 3rd round pick in exchange for Alexandar Georgiev and Lias Andersson
This is an honest question that I have had for some time, and maybe the people that are more plugged in can answer it. Does anyone have first hand knowledge that Kreider is a leader in the room? Not anecdotal evidence or cliche quotes to the press that so and so is a true leader.So as I’m watching tonight, I’m reminded of a moment that happened two weeks ago. My wife and I were having dinner in Phoenix in the same restaurant as the St. Louis Blues. There was a table of about 14 players (mostly young players) and Ryan O’Reilly was holding court. I couldn’t hear the whole conversation but what I heard after dinner was classic leadership. They were having a great time but at the end, O’Reilly called the group to order and talked about the importance of the game against the Coyotes the next night. It got serious and quiet and As an old hockey guy,
it was a beautiful moment to watch.
I see Chris Kreider as filling a big part of this role on the Rangers and I’ve been adamant about finding a way for the Rangers to keep him. In a year or two Stall and Lundqvist will be gone. I am sick of taking steps back for what could happen 4-5 years down the road. After a while it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.
Kreider is a player who can be part of the core on a championship team. I don’t think Skeji can be. I’m skeptical about Buchnevich. I think the Rangers need to spend money on leadership, move some of the chaff and get this team pointed back to the playoffs. I know there has to be sense to the contract but I think there is room for a deal. The same goes for Jesper Fast.
When I look at one first draft choice AWOL and another struggling in the minors, I’ve just about had enough draft picks. Monetize Georgiev, Look to trade guys not central to the core of a future contender and keep our fingers crossed that a majority of the young players in the organization amount to something.
This is an honest question that I have had for some time, and maybe the people that are more plugged in can answer it. Does anyone have first hand knowledge that Kreider is a leader in the room? Not anecdotal evidence or cliche quotes to the press that so and so is a true leader.
It's just that every time the conversation veers towards resigning CK, leadership comes up. I'm not knocking it, I'm not denying it, but I'm not buying into intangible qualities without some evidence. The leadership thing is like William Wallace level folklore.
Again, this is with all due respect and an honest question. This just felt like a good place to finally ask the question.
I would trade Kreider and then possibly re-sign him on July 1st
I've not seen this happen but I was thinking the same thing. The Hayes contract seems like way too much for krieder but for krieder a first and a decent prospect I could be down with that. Wishful thinking I supposeI would trade Kreider and then possibly re-sign him on July 1st
This illustrates the most basic misconception. As good as the informed and high hockey IQ are here, this board is littered with an equal number of fantasy video gamers that have no sense of the business.
These decisions were made last summer with 2 big contracts handed out plus the dead cap getting pushed to $7.5m. There are consequences and sacrifices in a cap league.Signing a 29 year old power forward who relies almost solely on his physical attributes to be a difference maker to a 6-7 year deal is a bad idea in general. It’s a horrible idea for a rebuilding team to hand out that type of contract as the most productive seasons of that players career will be years 1-3 and the team won’t be competing during that time more than likely. What your left with is an anchor on the salary cap for non-productive years.
Also, Zibanejad, Trouba, Panarin, heck evening Strome and Fast if they’re around are leaders in their own right.