romba
Registered User
Makes me feel better re: CK, but not as good re: Devils newly acquired assetsIt's not. He's spinning it in a totally negative way that doesn't reflect reality.
Makes me feel better re: CK, but not as good re: Devils newly acquired assetsIt's not. He's spinning it in a totally negative way that doesn't reflect reality.
Semantics here, but isn't it only top-3 protected? If ARI goes on a skid, the Devils could still end up with two top-15 picks in a loaded draft class.Arizona's 2020 pick was lottery protected.
But Avs and Oilers fans on the Main Board said we wouldn't get that.
Arizona's 2020 pick was lottery protected.
Only top-3, though, I thought?I stand corrected.
Semantics here, but isn't it only top-3 protected? If ARI goes on a skid, the Devils could still end up with two top-15 picks in a loaded draft class.
Only top-3, though, I thought?
The only thing I can say in Kreider’s defense is that when he has steamrolled players, the referees called penalties to the point of keeping him passive.Kreider is a big player with speed, he uses neither on a regular basis. I love his ability and skill but he is a pretty passive player given his physical attributes. Of all players on our team that could force dmen into mistakes by barreling in on them he is the one that could but doesnt have the biggest impact. Zuc as small as he was was more physical than Kreider in all areas of the ice.
Bennett? Seriously?
Drop the 4th OA from his record and he's a solid, physical middle 6-er.
I'd take a shot at him.
It's also not one or the other.
Nylander, Jost, picks, north-south players, etc. don't have to exist in an either/or world.
It's not that it's Jost OR an established player. Likewise it's not Nylander OR a left defenseman.
I think there's many moving parts in what the Rangers are going to be doing and it's not as linear, or as much of a fork in the road as we might think.
Drop the 4th OA from his record and he's a solid, physical middle 6-er.
I'd take a shot at him.
Sure would like to see the market come to fruition soon like dreger intimated.At the end of the day, the same reasons why there is the hesitation to move Kreider, and concerns about replacing him, is exactly why someone else wants him.
They don't have that depth piece or wing for their center. They want that depth or wing for their center.
Chris Kreider, without having a real hot streak yet this season, is pacing at 20 goals and 45 points. And that includes going without a goal for the first 10 percent of the season. Since that time, he's right back where he's been the last few years --- a roughly 28 goal, 50+ point pace. So no, his value is not going to drop because he went goal-less the first 8 games of the season.
The asking price will be a first and a B-prospect. Teams no this. Everyone expects it. Maybe you have a slight bidding war and the prospect becomes a bit more enticing, or maybe it comes down to which pick the Rangers think will be higher (look at what happened with Winnipeg's last season). Or maybe someone gives the Rangers a younger player that they like more than a late first.
Kreider's value and market really isn't hard to determine or establish. It will be there.
The only thing I can say in Kreider’s defense is that when he has steamrolled players, the referees called penalties to the point of keeping him passive.
On the other hand, he doesn’t seem to be able to adjust his speed or body position to make cleaner hits either. He could quite possibly learn to bend down a bit hit cleanly to please the refs.
Sam Bennett is a middle-6er?
I'm continually surprised by the resistance to adding players who haven't put it all together yet. Especially considering how many guys our roster is comprised of who didn't put it all together with their old team. Zibanejad, Strome, Lemieux, and ADA were in very similar situations to guys like Jost, Puljujarvi, and Bennett not that long ago. Of course its not a guarantee that those players take steps forward, there are plenty of examples where guys didn't, but the Rangers thus far have done a very good job of identifying those players.
I'm continually surprised by the resistance to adding players who haven't put it all together yet. Especially considering how many guys our roster is comprised of who didn't put it all together with their old team. Zibanejad, Strome, Lemieux, and ADA were in very similar situations to guys like Jost, Puljujarvi, and Bennett not that long ago. Of course its not a guarantee that those players take steps forward, there are plenty of examples where guys didn't, but the Rangers thus far have done a very good job of identifying those players.
Yet the other stuff, like adding more to the Howden, Hajek, Lindgren, Lias, etc grouping, I guess I don't see the value there given they already have a grouping of those players.
I mean, they got three prospects along with it, but none of them are good.Wait, that's all Hall got?!? Shero was probably worried he'll get injured and completely kill the value so he took the best he could get now. Man oh man, come TDL trade partners are going to try to use Hall to drive the price down on CK. Stay strong JG.
Czarnik any good? waivers
But Avs and Oilers fans on the Main Board said we wouldn't get that.