TominNC
Registered User
We need to improve the D. You don’t do that trading your best d-man
You should go read the kings board. They say Fiala floats and looks disinterested half the time while playing no defense. He has the worst +/- on the team and is horribly inconsistent. He isnt a play maker and definitely hasn't been driving play as he has 7 assists that aren't PP assists on the year. Everyone is killing Zibs and in his bad moments this year which is exactly what Fiala is all the time. You want more of that except Fiala is pacing for 50 something points for almost 8 mill and is signed for 4 more years? Yuck! I also disagree about his playoff play. He has 23 points in 43 games for almost 8 mill a year? Panarin is his last 43 playoff games has 33 points and tons of fans think he is a ghost in the playoffs. A half a point a game is debatable to even call him a top 6 player.I think that what you're seeing is people trying to get creative to revamp the roster. Panarin isn't a perfect player either. Fiala, for all his faults, is a 28 year old winger who plays with good pace and who has (2) seasons where he put up more than a ppg, followed by a season where he scored 73 points in 82 games. This is all with playing ~2 minutes less per game than Panarin.
He's also a player who drives possession pretty consistently over his career. He's not perfect, be he'd be a nice top-6 wing option for a team in transition to a younger core who could provide offense.
He also carries a decent cap number ($7.875m) that could come back in return for Panarin's $11.6m number going the other way. It's highly unlikely that any trade of Panarin doesn't return some sort of higher cap hit contract coming back as part of the return.
Also, for all the shit Fiala gets for his playoff numbers, look at the teams he was on.
19-20 - 4 points in 4 games, where his team got swept
20-21 - 2 points in a 7 game series
21022 - 3 points in 6 games
22-23 - 6 points in 3 games
23-24 - 2 points in 5 games
Notice a trend? His teams haven't had very large sample sizes to pull from. But if we take his last 4 times in the playoffs, he has 13 points in 21 games. Not great, but not horrible. And his $7.875m contract is pretty much right in line with Lafreniere which is pretty much a 2nd liner.
Fox is like Zubov. People coming up with superfluous reasons to trade our most talented D-man. We have missed opportunities to add guys like Hanifin and Chychrun as partners for him in the past.
You should go read the kings board. They say Fiala floats and looks disinterested half the time while playing no defense. He has the worst +/- on the team and is horribly inconsistent. He isnt a play maker and definitely hasn't been driving play as he has 7 assists that aren't PP assists on the year. Everyone is killing Zibs and in his bad moments this year which is exactly what Fiala is all the time. You want more of that except Fiala is pacing for 50 something points for almost 8 mill and is signed for 4 more years? Yuck! I also disagree about his playoff play. He has 23 points in 43 games for almost 8 mill a year? Panarin is his last 43 playoff games has 33 points and tons of fans think he is a ghost in the playoffs. A half a point a game is debatable to even call him a top 6 player.
I think the people who want Fiala have not watched him play a lot and are just stat watching. Kings fans would probably let him go for next to nothing just to get rid of his salary. Kind of how Ranger fans would give away Zibs just so he is gone. Sorry but Fiala has been terrible and Panarin is even in a down year the far better player.
no, on principle alone, no
Mika does not control us
break him
ck we decide on the merits later
it is NOT nonsenseWhat is this f***ing nonsense?
The best thing the Rangers can do is get Mika out of the funk that he's in that way:
1.) They have another number one center or
2.) They have a number one center to trade
"break him"
"bench him"
Does nothing for this franchise except make his trade value even lower, make him more impossible to trade, and make clear to the entire league that the Rangers are a Mickey Mouse operation that stomps their feet when they get mad and take their toys away.
This is the kind of unrealistic shit, er, solutions that you suggest that are beyond the pale and completely unrealistic. Not only that, they are completely counter intuitive to what you're trying to accomplish (get rid of Mika).
Fixing your problems are easier than getting rid of them. Make Mika valuable again.
Fox is like Zubov. People coming up with superfluous reasons to trade our most talented D-man. We have missed opportunities to add guys like Hanifin and Chychrun as partners for him in the past.
Except for me!Imagine if Fox were Russian like Zubov the cries would be louder and even more people would think he's small and soft.
I'd hate to lose both Lafreniere and Cuylle.Likely will depend on a few factors....of which none have been determined as of yet and that being who will slot with who if Panarin and Kreider are still here and whether Laf moves back to his natural wing . He is at this time no Hell on his opposite side .
Another thing....albeit likely a long shot at this time....is that Cuylle and Laf would likely be involved in any Tkachuk deal if it ever happens . Anyways...all speculation at this time .
Oh I agree....but that is what the Sens will want....and who can blame them ? I would not make that deal . Lafreniere though will need to pick up the effort these last games of the season ....if he can't hack it he may find himself wearing another uniform next year .I'd hate to lose both Lafreniere and Cuylle.
If we are looking to be more difficult to play against, losing both in a Brady deal seems like treading water.
it is NOT nonsense
It is taking a firm stand to establish a track record that we don't deal Kreider to appease Mika.
WE decide if and when ck goes
and if it makes more sense -- which it does currently -- to deal Mika first, we will do so
now to get that done and pay for the fuggin mistake of giving this jerk off an iron clad nmc, then that is the price we pay
we bench him eat half, and have a 3rd team like ANA do Smith in lieu of like 4 6ths to eat another 1.75m per x 4.
At that extreme discount Isles will bite
And that IS the BEST way moving forward
in zib's case, we gotta cut bait and take our losses to get out from under the 4.25 cap we can recover going forward, and move on w/no locker room drama
Kreider is actually injured
Zib just wigged out for a month and a half with less than zero excuse
He HAS TO BE BROKEN TO SEND A MESSAGE TO THE PLAYERS
period
Hanifin.Fox is like Zubov. People coming up with superfluous reasons to trade our most talented D-man. We have missed opportunities to add guys like Hanifin and Chychrun as partners for him in the past.
Hanifin.
You're not concerned with Fox's level of play this season? Everyone blames every factor except Fox. Lindgren's fault. Drury's fault. Laviolette's fault. Housley's fault. Who else can you blame?
Fox was supposed to play with Slavin in the 4 Nations and we would see the real Adam Fox. Fox still looks awful. The lack of a defense partner is why Fox looks awful? He is not the same player from a few seasons ago. Lindgren was the partner at that time. Nothing has really changed. He takes a dumb penalty last night and he whines to the officials. Be quiet and serve your two minutes.
Top 20 skaters in the 4 Nations
Sweden-U.S.
Not sure anyone is saying that Fox is having a good season.
But I also don't believe you trade a Fox level player due to one bad season while still in the prime of his career as he just turned 27.
There is not one player on the team, in the pipeline or available in a trade tjat can give us offensively what Fox can and does.
Whats the point as we would then be scrambling to find his replacement thus nullifying the trade anyway.
We just have an example from the opposite side on what happens when the organization loses control of the roster and must sell their number one center for cents on a dollar.What is this f***ing nonsense?
The best thing the Rangers can do is get Mika out of the funk that he's in that way:
1.) They have another number one center or
2.) They have a number one center to trade
"break him"
"bench him"
Does nothing for this franchise except make his trade value even lower, make him more impossible to trade, and make clear to the entire league that the Rangers are a Mickey Mouse operation that stomps their feet when they get mad and take their toys away.
This is the kind of unrealistic shit, er, solutions that you suggest that are beyond the pale and completely unrealistic. Not only that, they are completely counter intuitive to what you're trying to accomplish (get rid of Mika).
Fixing your problems are easier than getting rid of them. Make Mika valuable again.
NHL front office might have given a directive to postpone any trade announcements (if possible) until after the challenge tournament ends.Vacation time is over. The players are reporting later this afternoon for practice. Today and tomorrow are the days we may see a few trades made which has been the speculation since the NHL shutdown last Sunday.
Kreider went from not playing for two games to playing a prominent role for the U.S. team. Power play. PK. Top line. Hopefully, Kreider's trade value can be reestablished or other teams see he can still be a major contributor these next two seasons including in the playoffs this season.
back issues are not mere discomfortKreider is not injured.
He may have discomfort, he may have even been hurt but he is not injured.
Injured players don’t play
Look I like Chris Kreider but this team doesn't revolve around him. If people can contemplate moving Igor, Fox, Panarin, Lafreniere they can certainly contemplate moving Kreider.....and you don't have to take it like it's a personal affront. He's not our most important player.....there are several ahead of him.
I don't get how trading Kreider appeases Mika? That doesn't make any sense. It might make Mika more apt to want to move on to but we don't really know these people. That's not clear at all. Because a player is declining or because he signed a contract does not make him a jerk either. It might make his relationship with the fanbase more problematic but it doesn't say anything about the player as an actual person. You're ready to make excuses for Kreiders underwhelming season and not Mika's. They've both been bad when they've played together and not so great when they haven't. You should also know why Mika would be a tougher contract to move.....it's his cap number and remaining term limit.
Would I have scratched Mika a few times this year already? Yeah I would have. If he's beginning to find his game now I also think it's a little late to save the year. So I am annoyed at the part he played. I also thinking you're riding this Kreider back injury for all it's worth. We've seen him get a couple goals lately on a team rush and finding an extra gear to get past the defender. I think he's healthy again and has been for a while and he played last night and had another rush goal against Sweden. Why would he even be in this tournament if he's banged up? The Rangers pay him not team USA. This tournament AFAIC is show off shit. He shouldn't be playing if he's hurt. He's not had a good year though and if he picks up late in the season and we don't make the playoffs----like Mika it will be too little too late. His would be an easier contract to move too.