Do we expect Edstrom to be back after the break? 4th line needs big Ed.
His regular season is over, most likely. Sounds like a break.Do we expect Edstrom to be back after the break? 4th line needs big Ed.
But we did, so here we are.Could have just not traded the 1st.
Am open to a second look w/mo scrutiny, but my expectation is he will want long term and even if not top top dollar will not be cheap and time wise back end of a long term deal may not be goodWhy not Prov?
Not sure KAM is legit at that quote but I'd try to go max 8 hrs 5.75-6.25, no NMCs, ok level of ntcAFP Projections
Anyone seen this yet? Gavrikov and Orlov seem reasonable based on projections
Gavrikov - 5 years @ $5.4m
Orlov - 3 @ $5m
Maata - 3 @ $3.1m
Kovacevix - 2 years @ $1.55m
They have K'Andre Miller @ 6 years and $5.3m cap hit. SIGN THAT DEAL NOW
I'm all for making smart moves without having to fit it into a paradigm. Trading our first was not a smart move.
Gavrikov played with Shesterkin on SKA. If Shesterkin gives Drury the thumbs up, I could see NYR going after Gavrikov this summer.You don't want Orlov. Especially at the number he likely will get. Gavrikov and Maata. We should get Maata now and resign him. Good replacement for Lindgten and would be a great 3LD with Schneider if we get Gavrikov in the summer. Or another top LD.
That's what we want? Sneak into the playoffs to get destroyed in the 1st round?
No players on this team are untouchable imo. Few in sports are.Gotta start over at this point.
I would hate to trade Fox but who else would be untouchable?
And definitely anyone over 30 should be gone. Mika, Kreider, Panarin, Smith. Lindgren too.
Yes, let's trade him b'c return >>>> keeping himOh look, Fox is a 26 yo 1st pair RD for Team USA. He's on the wrong side of 25. Let's trade him!
....
Lafreniere before he loses all his value like Kakko did?
this 5v5 defensive number is more dependent on the team than it purports to be.The Athletic has updated their player cards. Will Cuylle. How much would it cost for 6 years instead of doing the two year bridge deal and going for more term later? Dom and Shayna have Cuylle's value at $3.6M.
View attachment 975547
Personally, I think they are more likely to lose in the 2nd round.The Caps are geriatric and they'll be buyers before losing in the first round. Not a position I wanna be in.
Gotcha. I’m thinking there’s about an 80 % chance he’ll be here next year. Hopefully, in a lot better shape.I'm assuming Mika won't be here after this summer. If he is, I'm honestly not sure this team is serious about winning a cup.
I agree wholeheartedly that we need to start infusing speed up & down the lineup, however.
Considering we don't have our first unless it's top 13, and depending where it falls, I'd rather the 2026 first, I guess getting destroyed in the 1st round and giving up a later first wouldn't be the worst thing.That's what we want? Sneak into the playoffs to get destroyed in the 1st round?
There are no easy wins, but even so, I doubt they are on see-saw and are going to base their actions on how it goes over the last 3-4 games before the deadline.The 3 games immediately following the four nations break will dictate our deadline path IMO.
Sabres, Pens, Islanders. That SHOULD be 3 easy wins, but this team doesn't make anything easy.
Win all 3 and we will likely be in a wild card spot. 2-1 probably has us anywhere from 2-4 points back. Any other outcome and we may find ourselves in too big a hole to climb out of.
With the cap rising so much is there really a way to say on a multi-year contract that $6.5m AAV is appropriate but $7m is not?I'd sign Gavrikov for a number close to $7m. Maybe not $7m, but $6.5m? $6.75m? Yeah I'm in for that.
Yeah, you're probably right. Right now, they would match up with Detroit who are somehow in a playoff spot.Personally, I think they are more likely to lose in the 2nd round.
He still makes poor to stupid decisions with and without the puck.People still haven't processed the fact that K Miller was being weighed down by the mother of all anchors and haven't updated their view on him.