Speculation: Roster Building Thread : Part XV (Light em up!)

[bernmeister]

1000%
"tear it down" isnt an option
sure we can collect late 2nd or 3rd rounders for spare part players
to do what with exactly? play with mika in a few years? Lol.

you would think the team hasnt won a game since october the way this thread has been going

I expect nothing from the handful who constant ha ha my posts with no constructive input whatsoever.
I expect more/better from you

The posture of what is/is not an option
BENDS BUCKLES AND BREAKS IN CAPITULATION
to what is the optimal approach that is the rule not the exception:
b'c of cap reality, if you accept the logic that most seasons with competitive team = longest window = best chance of winning a cup,
THEN
you need to try to constantly max your quality youth
which means stop favoring vets over youth, and after using vets as stopgap, keep actively selling vets to max youth position

Mika needs to go yesterday
stuff I and others have said about acknowledging reality that we need major changes [b'c we can't get over the last hump in quest for the cup] is ignored at peril of continuing to suffer]

 

[Profet]

1000%
"tear it down" isnt an option
sure we can collect late 2nd or 3rd rounders for spare part players
to do what with exactly? play with mika in a few years? Lol.

you would think the team hasnt won a game since october the way this thread has been going

Winning a championship with this crop of players is also not an option.

Being bad makes your draft picks more valuable. Being mediocre makes them less valuable and gives you about the same chance at a championship.

I'm old. I don't want to see more of the same. I want a Stanley Cup.

And at the end of the day, if you aren't icing a team that can win a cup, what are you doing?

 

[UnSandvich]

I'd trade Schneider for a lot of players since he isn't very good.

I wouldn't. Not because I think he's anything especially great but because I think he's got a reputation better than his play, and I think he could be a key piece in getting some higher-end asset.

Also because we have absolutely 0 pipeline at RHD.

 

[McRanger92]

Regarding Schneider, I feel like he's regressed offensively but improved somewhat defensively, especially since Vaak arrived. I still think he is not anywhere near physical enough because he should be much more. It's not as dire as Miller but he hasn't taken that step. His play has made him replaceable and we have organizational depth. I also would gladly keep him and roll with a long term RD of Fox-Schneider-Mancini-Emery. We already have enough work to do on the left side. Of available guys id be more willing to move Schneider for Cozens than JT.

 

[Siddi]

non sequitur
and detached from reality


no x 2
neither better nor best
and actually, taking into account the legit, real actual issue of playing defense, he has been one of, if not, the worst

This is why it is pointless in engaging with you. You have painted yourself so deep into the corner that reality is now an abstract notion in your world. There was a 3 game stretch not a week ago where he was outperforming every other skater on the team. The stat cards are in the PGT of those games. Wether you like it or not Mika has been one of the teams best players since the break. You would garner much more respect if your stance was that Mika should be traded for the greater good without the Kreider fellatio and all the theatrics.

Nothing you say makes sense. You wanted to healthy scratch Mika when he was playing like shit stating that his play justified such action from the coaching staff but what about when he started to pick his game up? You still wanted to scratch him but where is the justification for that? Oh, sorry, I forgot, "sit him anyways, break him, I DONT WANT HIM TO WIN!!!!"

You are either not well or a troll. It is sad, cause once upon a time you were at least entertaining. Anyways, I am done wasting time on you.

 

[Matt Rentfree]

And at the end of the day, if you aren't icing a team that can win a cup, what are you doing?

Making obscene amounts of money. Dolan doesn't give a rat's ass about winning a cup.

 

[Oscar Lindberg]

Mancini stunk in his time with the team, no idea why anyone had him penciled as a long term options

 

[eco's bones]

All well and good but you didnt answer my question.

Mika has shown improvement and his trajectory is positive while Kreider is the opposite. How come you have more faith in Kreider turning it around despite being older and apparently more injury prone on top of being outperformed by Mika?

I mean, it was clear as day for everyone that as soon as Mika got away from Kreider his game started to improve. Not even the most fervent Mika haters could deny that and many of them even admitted as much.

Edit: Just to clarify, I am not calling you a Mika hater.

Improving or not he's still not scoring much and he's making a lot of money to produce a lot of points.

I'm not a Mika hater and I'm not a Kreider hater either. I wasn't a Trouba hater and I'm not a Lindgren hater. I had no problem with Jacob being moved---I thought it was a good deal for us. His play had been declining too. But back to Z....Mika's game started slipping last year and Kreider's definitely hasn't been great this year. That line has been a big letdown. Again possibility of either rebounding my guess is it would more likely be Chris. Easier to move would also be Chris and I think we should get a better return for Chris. Bern doesn't like me trading away his favorite player though so I guess I can't.

Age does take a toll. Chris is older. They've both been excellent players for us but there also comes a time. There's also timing in things. If we hang on to one or both and they don't rebound the window could close and they might be a lot harder to move next year. Not necessarily disastrous because the Rangers have been moving a lot of ELC and second contracts on to the team. A lot depends on how Drury or his replacement look at things but if they think reorganizing the team means the team takes a step back for the next couple years they might as well move on from Chris right now. Holding on to a 33/34/35 year old player for a non-playoff or cusp playoff team is not really smart asset management. On the other hand not getting screwed with a bad deal factors in too.

 

[KirkAlbuquerque]

Mancini stunk in his time with the team, no idea why anyone had him penciled as a long term options

Borden sucked for almost a whole month but was allowed to play through it now people think he’s good.

But he’s a vet so he’s allowed to suck

 

[Fitzy]

Mancini stunk in his time with the team, no idea why anyone had him penciled as a long term options

The general governing assumption with struggling prospects is that they can always improve with experience

 

[Siddi]

Improving or not he's still not scoring much and he's making a lot of money to produce a lot of points.

I'm not a Mika hater and I'm not a Kreider hater either. I wasn't a Trouba hater and I'm not a Lindgren hater. I had no problem with Jacob being moved---I thought it was a good deal for us. His play had been declining too. But back to Z....Mika's game started slipping last year and Kreider's definitely hasn't been great this year. That line has been a big letdown. Again possibility of either rebounding my guess is it would more likely be Chris. Easier to move would also be Chris and I think we should get a better return for Chris. Bern doesn't like me trading away his favorite player though so I guess I can't.

Age does take a toll. Chris is older. They've both been excellent players for us but there also comes a time. There's also timing in things. If we hang on to one or both and they don't rebound the window could close and they might be a lot harder to move next year. Not necessarily disastrous because the Rangers have been moving a lot of ELC and second contracts on to the team. A lot depends on how Drury or his replacement look at things but if they think reorganizing the team means the team takes a step back for the next couple years they might as well move on from Chris right now. Holding on to a 33/34/35 year old player for a non-playoff or cusp playoff team is not really smart asset management. On the other hand not getting screwed with a bad deal factors in too.

Well, nobody is scoring right now so thats that. And if we only go by guessing then my guess is that Mika is the more likely candidate to rebound since he is the one showing actual improvement at the moment.

Anyways, thank you for taking your time and replying.