Fair enough but on which part? How would you project a comparable (in their prime, not their current state - wasn’t talking about 2024 Skinner)? He isn’t big nor physical. He isn’t fast. He may not be slow, but he is not a world beater at all and this team needs large helpings of speed. His offensive instincts are tremendous, sure, and we need that too. But size and speed often both become great equalizers at the NHL level for guys who dominated against younger competition. We can debate whether he’s been the line driver or not and whether he has benefited from his line mate situation or they have benefited from him, and I’m happy to be flexible. But if this team had developed Hughes and Stutzle instead of Laf and Kakko, I genuinely do not believe people would be as high on Perreault. And even then, I acknowledged he is a great prospect. He is simply a type that we need less than a 6’1 center or a fast, tenacious top six winger.
To say that he's got questionable compete or that it's not a part of his game is off base, it's not even close to true.
Hockey sense is the great equalizer, not size and speed. I've seen big guys fail, I've seen fast guys fail, I've seen big and fast guys fail (hello Julien Gauthier!) I haven't really seen smart guys fail. He's got that in spades, perhaps more so than any prospect on the planet. I don't think it really matters what they did with Laf and Kakko, they could have been mega stars and everyone would still be f***ing excited as balls for Perreault who not only is the NTDP single season all time leader in scoring (yes, context is necessary here, he played with other high end guys) but he's also scored more in the last 1+seasons of college hockey than...
Every other player who has played college hockey during that time span. At a certain point I think we just need to acknowledge that the guy is just f***ing good. I also don't think trying to paint the guy as Jeff Skinner is accurate on so many levels... One of which being that a prime Jeff Skinner was a terrific skater and if he moved like that he would have gone top 3-5 in his draft year. Their playing styles aren't even remotely similar and quite honestly, Skinner's been a pretty good player so even if that were the outcome, no one should be upset, thats a home run at 23 OA.
On the size - He doesn't shy away from the tough areas and has excelled there to this point in his career. I don't think it's unfair to question whether or not he can continue to do this at the NHL level, but I do think it's unfair to automatically assume that he won't.
on tenacity - how much have you watched him? He isn't going to break faces but he works really hard to get the puck back when he doesn't have it and he's really good at getting it back.
Also, they track things at the NCAA level and at the NTDP level, he's basically been as responsible for creating offense as anyone beyond just raw production. Smith was actually the one who was more of the mooch than the other 2 (and no one should be surprised that it's been a bit of a struggle for him at the NHL level, it was too big of a jump to ask him to make after 1 year of NCAA hockey and on
that team) and I've been pretty open with how high I am on Leonard.
Again fair to be skeptical about how they're going to handle him, but that has nothing to do with his status as a prospect and what he's been able to do and shown up to this point.