How do you know that without knowing what LAK would be willing to give?Trading down would be equally stupid.
How do you know that without knowing what LAK would be willing to give?Trading down would be equally stupid.
Nothing personal against Strome but unless he had a red hot Panarin on his line he is basically a ghost. He doesn’t shoot, he fumbles many pucks, etcI'm officially on the trade Strome wagon. Not because I don't think he can be an effective secondary scorer, but because of the situation this team is in, I don't think they can allocate the funds he will require to be kept and I'd prefer the future capital in both cap space and assets he returns
.
If there was indeed some legs to the Rangers trying to acquire Darnell Nurse, that's a player who would really help solidify that left side moving forward. He also plays a pretty physical in your face style that Gorton seems to be looking for. I'd be curious to hear their reaction to something based around DeAngelo for Nurse
Trading down would be equally stupid.
And neither he nor Strome are long term solutionsHe's 34...wtf is wrong with people.
If there was indeed some legs to the Rangers trying to acquire Darnell Nurse, that's a player who would really help solidify that left side moving forward. He also plays a pretty physical in your face style that Gorton seems to be looking for. I'd be curious to hear their reaction to something based around DeAngelo for Nurse
The optics alone of the team getting the #1 pick for the first time in more than half a century and going off board would keep them from taking Byfield
They just extended him, no?
It would be stupid not to take an offer. Byfield plus assets would be an insane haul. Rangers need more than just one play.Trading down from 1OA to 2OA+++ is not at all stupid. Byfield is extremely good
Trading down from 1OA to 2OA+++ is not at all stupid. Byfield is extremely good
AgreedTrading down unless you get an extreme over-payment would be extremely stupid. Trading up from #2 with an extreme over-payment would be equally stupid. So neither is a plausible scenario.
I'll never understand this board's obsession with insisting that fantasy scenarios debunk reality.
I love, love, love Byfield and I will be the first to say that taking him over Lafreniere would be absolutely stupid. Passing on the clear BPA who can likely step in immediately for positional need? Delusional.
I am by far not the most knowledgeable fan here but I am curious as to the weight that Gorton and JD put into these 4 abysmal games.
I get that we are in unprecedented times, but so are the other teams. We were the worst of everyone IMO. I didn’t watch every game but I saw some from every team and we just looked lost and uninspired.
Id love to hear some insight from folks like @Edge or @bobbop how they feel management views this showing as far as team construct, coaching AND individual players (not just Hank, Staal but even Kreider & Trouba)
It was an easy article for Brooksie to write because he's appealing to the red meat, we need moar grit, SHOOOOOOOT the puck on the powerplay crowd. He knows it, and I'm sure there's already people foaming at the mouth for size and grit after Carolina waxed us in 3 games.
The issue is that Carolina didn't beat us by being the bigger, grittier team. They beat us by playing a structured system that pressures you in a 5-man unit all over the ice. Quinn preaches that this is what he wants the Rangers to do, but we haven't seen anything close to resembling this style of hockey. The sandpaper thing is a load of nonsense IMO. Sebastian Aho is 6'0, 175lbs and he was an absolute buzzsaw all series with how he was pressuring the puck and breaking plays up with his stick.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love Byfield, but it's ridiculous to think we should take him 1OA over Lafreniere.
How many Cups has optics won?The optics alone of the team getting the #1 pick for the first time in more than half a century and going off board would keep them from taking Byfield
Would never never happen
Who caresHow many Cups has optics won?
Is Eichel realistic? He would catapult us into the conversation as cup contenders. ADA + Filip+Georgiev+lower 1st.... seems fair?
I think both are of equal importance and both should be addressed.I'd posit that Left Defense, and the defensive rotation in general, is priority number one. Clearing dead cap space in a way that doesn't hurt us down the line is number two.
We're still counting on Chytil eventually turning into a respectable 2nd line center.
That said, since the team still probably won't be quite where we need it to be next season, I'd be comfortable riding the Lundqvist Staal and Smith contracts to conclusion to avoid downstream cap problems.
It would be stupid not to take an offer. Byfield plus assets would be an insane haul. Rangers need more than just one play.
But this is pointless. We aren't getting the top pick.