Speculation: Roster Building thread: Part XIX (Thanks, Sam)

Status
Not open for further replies.


So for the people crying about the 2026 1st, will you stop if the Rangers decide to keep it? Will that make the JT trade ok in your eyes?

Pittsburgh is always getting Gavin McKenna unless the Rangers keep the 2026 pick in which case the Rangers are never getting Gavin McKenna and if they do they're going to ruin him. On and on and on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McRanger92
Pittsburgh is always getting Gavin McKenna unless the Rangers keep the 2026 pick in which case the Rangers are never getting Gavin McKenna and if they do they're going to ruin him. On and on and on.

Honestly its very comforting to me to see who is blackpilling around here and who is willing to see how things play out. The purge is still far from over. The season isnt even over lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bhamill and effen
Because at the end of the day, your culture is set by your best player(s). Given the comical hissy fits any time (A)da(m) F(o)x is brought up, that's Panarin.

The teams culture has been for 5 years "lets float around and tickle our balls and wait for Foxy and Bread to magic some bullshit" and as those two have gone, so have the Rangers. They must be broken of this. Keeping all your tone setters while running your least important but HF Approved(tm) whipping boys out of town does nothing except get a lot of likes on a messageboard.
The culture isn’t the problem, the roster construction is. The Rangers simply do not have as much talent as the other best teams in the league. The reason they had to wait for Panarin and Fox to pull off magical feats is because that’s the only way they create any offense, when those two are on the ice.

But I’m not even opposed to trading Panarin in principle, however it makes no sense in the context of the J.T. Miller trade. Trading Panarin so that you can “build” around J.T. Miller teaching players how to play a more simplistic dumbed down version of hockey is a fools errand, which is what it seems like the plan is going forward.
 
I can't believe losing Jacob Trouba and Barclay Goodrow and Ryan Lindgren and Jimmy Vesey didn't change any of the Rangers fundamental problems, somehow they look very much the same. I wonder if the solution here isn't to dump Carson Soucy and Matt Rempe.

Maybe firing Tanner Glass and Jed Ortmeyer from the organization will be the ticket. Who else is largely unimportant but easy to farm likes bitching about. Let's f***ing go.
 
The culture isn’t the problem, the roster construction is. The Rangers simply do not have as much talent as the other best teams in the league. The reason they had to wait for Panarin and Fox to pull off magical feats is because that’s the only way they create any offense, when those two are on the ice.

But I’m not even opposed to trading Panarin in principle, however it makes no sense in the context of the J.T. Miller trade. Trading Panarin so that you can “build” around J.T. Miller teaching players how to play a more simplistic dumbed down version of hockey is a fools errand, which is what it seems like the plan is going forward.

What if they are trading Panarin so they can build around Perreault, Lafreniere and Cuylle? There are no shortage of young, NHL ready wingers on the roster and in Hartford. The issue is we have no centers. JT Miller is a center. Just because he's a 32 year old *gasp* doesnt mean hes going to die tomorrow.
 
the only time Zib looked halfway decent this season is when he was moved to RW.

I think his 1C or 2C days are over.
I dont know about that. Him and JT split center duties on that line 50/50 and I still dont believe his play this season was affected by age or physical decline. I still believe (maybe foolishly) that this season was just a perfect SHITstorm.
 
I can't believe losing Jacob Trouba and Barclay Goodrow and Ryan Lindgren and Jimmy Vesey didn't change any of the Rangers fundamental problems, somehow they look very much the same. I wonder if the solution here isn't to dump Carson Soucy and Matt Rempe.

Maybe firing Tanner Glass and Jed Ortmeyer from the organization will be the ticket. Who else is largely unimportant but easy to farm likes bitching about. Let's f***ing go.

no i think the solution is actually to trade any player with actual hockey talent because they're all sissy nancy boys
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HatTrick Swayze
What if they are trading Panarin so they can build around Perreault, Lafreniere and Cuylle? There are no shortage of young, NHL ready wingers on the roster and in Hartford. The issue is we have no centers. JT Miller is a center. Just because he's a 32 year old *gasp* doesnt mean hes going to die tomorrow.
Building around Lafreniere and Cuylle? Please. I have high hopes for Perreault and I like Cuylle but you can’t be serious. This is the exact issue @Machinehead, others, and myself have been talking about. We constantly have to settle for less. No, I’m sorry building around those 3 players with an aging J.T. Miller and Vincent Trocheck is not good enough.

If that’s the plan then just f***ing rebuild.
 
Frank mentioned Rick Tocchet as a possibility for the Rangers if he doesn't stay in Vancouver. The Canucks have an option year for next season. EF said Vancouver and Tocchet will make a decision soon. Either he signs a new deal or he moves on to another team.

Tocchet is a great guy. I was watching this interview live after a Vancouver game. Great interview.



The Flyers are very interested in Tocchet.

The Rangers interviewed Tocchet in 2021.
 
Forget Messier, pretend he's not in the picture. What about the points he's making is incorrect?
They’re just generic, empty calorie points that you could apply to any team-building thought exercise in leagues constrained by salary caps. Like, c’mon man. That’s the exact type of empty lip service that I’m talking about.

Identify a leader and a group of players to build around? Revolutionary concepts there
 
Building around Lafreniere and Cuylle? Please. I have high hopes for Perreault and I like Cuylle but you can’t be serious. This is the exact issue @Machinehead, others, and myself have been talking about. We constantly have to settle for less. No, I’m sorry building around those 3 players with an aging J.T. Miller and Vincent Trocheck is not good enough.

If that’s the plan then just f***ing rebuild.

Fox is here, Igor is here. Theres a lot of youth on the roster already. Young players cant improve? No one is saying we're winning the Cup next year. You have to start somewhere. The organization has literally nothing at center. Rangers can draft their savior next year when they keep the pick and he'll be ready for the NHL by the tome JT's contract is up. No harm no foul.
 
The culture isn’t the problem, the roster construction is. The Rangers simply do not have as much talent as the other best teams in the league. The reason they had to wait for Panarin and Fox to pull off magical feats is because that’s the only way they create any offense, when those two are on the ice.

But I’m not even opposed to trading Panarin in principle, however it makes no sense in the context of the J.T. Miller trade. Trading Panarin so that you can “build” around J.T. Miller teaching players how to play a more simplistic dumbed down version of hockey is a fools errand, which is what it seems like the plan is going forward.
The Miller trade was a Hail Mary on a locker room shift for this year, which was widely known to be the last crack for the current group. You can't say he didn't empty the clip for this group of losers. He did, it failed, and now that this year is over, you go forward.

You make a better roster via winning personnel moves. Trading a jellyhead and a 16 or 17 year old for a PPG center outperforming his current contract is a trade you do 100 times out of 100 whether you're New York, San Jose, or CSKA Moscow. Panarin has nothing to do with that.
 
They’re just generic, empty calorie points that you could apply to any team-building thought exercise in leagues constrained by salary caps. Like, c’mon man. That’s the exact type of empty lip service that I’m talking about.

Identify a leader and a group of players to build around? Revolutionary concepts there

Apparently not for this team because there is no leader or core of players to build around. We'd be in the playoffs if there was.
 
Frank mentioned Rick Tocchet as a possibility for the Rangers if he doesn't stay in Vancouver. The Canucks have an option year for next season. EF said Vancouver and Tocchet will make a decision soon. Either he signs a new deal or he moves on to another team.

Tocchet is a great guy. I was watching this interview live after a Vancouver game. Great interview.



The Flyers are very interested in Tocchet.

The Rangers interviewed Tocchet in 2021.


Seravalli doesnt know anything, Tocchet's agent just wants to drum up interest in a contract extension with Vancouver or a new job elsewhere. Rangers are always the kindling for that. Remember we "coveted" Nazem Kadri lol?
 
The Rangers are 12th in goals with the 6th worst PP but somehow have a bottom 3 offense if they lose 1 guy.

Are we ok. I feel like we're not ok.
 
Uh no?

Because there’s a decent chance the team is going to f***ing suck next year and Pittsburgh will have our pick in a better draft
Maybe I read @McRanger92 's post wrong...

But I believe he was asking if the Rangers decide to keep the 2026 draft pick.

Myself, I firmly believe that unless the 2025 pick is top 5, they should keep the 2026 pick.
 
The Rangers have more goals than the Panthers (Barkov, Tkachuk), Devils (Hughes, Bratt, Hischier), and Senators (Tkachuk, Stutzle).

Tell me more about their bottom 3 offense minus an 85 point Panarin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McRanger92
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad