Yeah the analytics are a major mixed bag. I was just listening to a podcast where the host said that he a) appreciated Team A for passing up shots for more "efficiency" and b) he really wasn't impressed with their "possession" (which has always been approximated by shot attempts).The team that traded for Jeannott is probably one of the smartest teams in the league for what its worth. That Guentzel contract that wouldnt have helped us at all seems to have made an impact, but i digress).
As far as the "analytics" stuff (I hate that word because its not specific and I dont want to paint all predictive stats with a wide brush) the problem is when a trade or signing goes down Dom L (who is an absolute clown btw) and jfresh and others like that throw a chart in everyone's face and say how stupid a move it was and what an idiot the Gm is before the guy plays a game in his new spot. Just because a player had bad underlying numbers on 1 team, doesnt mean he's going to be bad on another team. There are mountains of examples of this. You can't tie a teams poor underlyings to 1 player, just like you cant tie a good teams underlying numbers to 1 player. Jack Johnson was a boat anchor on the Rangers. He won a Cup as a regular the next year with Colorado. The situation matters more than the players heat map, and the analytics zealots like to appeal to the authority of guys who have largely thrown shit at a wall. 32 NHL teams are not beholden to these orthodoxies that have popped up over the last 10-15 years. Not sure why fans should be.
I almost crashed my car in fury lol