View attachment 946822
The Rangers need to grow up and stop playing the victims
Since the Rangers’ conference final Game 6 elimination in Sunrise on June 1, general manager Chris Drury:
• Was able to get the final three seasons of Barclay Goodrow’s contract with an annual $3.641.667 million cap hit off the books
by waiving the winger to San Jose.
• Signed Alexis Lafreniere to a seven-year, $52.15 million extension that kicks in next season
for an annual average of $7.45 million per, about $1 million per below anticipated.
• Traded Jacob Trouba to Anaheim
without retaining a cent of the money or the $8 million cap charge due to the defenseman through the end of the 2025-26 season.
• Signed Igor Shesterkin to an eight-year, $92 million extension that kicks in next season with
an NHL-record goaltending cap hit of $11.5 million per that was $500,000-$2 million under projections on the open market.
• [Stage whisper] There was also
a memo.
The narrative that has been circulating for weeks is that the Rangers players do not like the way Drury does business and as a result have gone into some sort of a sit-down strike, apparently hoping to influence ownership to change the passcode for the executive suite.
Of course there is no indication that any change to the organizational directory is being contemplated.
That also applies to head coach Peter Laviolette and his staff, even as baseless reports circulate that the team is looking to make a change behind the bench.
I doubt there was a particularly kind way for Drury to advise Goodrow that the only way the club could move him without retaining a large portion of his contract was to place him on waivers, but maybe the GM could have found a way.
And I have no idea how the players believe Trouba was wronged when
the club tried to trade him on July 1 after his no-move became a partial no-trade, but I’m all ears on that one. Trouba had always been the one to knock throughout his 12-year career, but not this time. He was on the other end of it, and
apparently did not like it at all.
Time’s a wastin’
The Rangers’ body language
has been dreadful.
Once Drury’s Substack message became public, the club’s leadership group shriveled like Costanza in the pool. There are exceptions, but the Blueshirts seem to feel they are somehow victims and that folks should feel sorry for them.
I have said this before, but if the Rangers think they are quitting on Drury or Laviolette or both, the fact is that they are quitting on themselves, their teammates (who are supposed be family) and the customers who pay big money to watch them play.
Drury has the obligation to address the team. An open, honest dialogue is imperative. If players feel they have been disrespected and want out, they have the obligation to speak up.
Reilly Smith is the only player on the team to win the Stanley Cup. Are you telling me this veteran core is throwing away a season they will never get back because their feelings were hurt over the summer? How many chances do they think they’re going to have?
The teams of the past decade that fell short are remembered fondly and with respect. The clubs of Emile Francis that fell short are beloved.
It is never quite Cup-or-Bust for generations of the faithful who have seen the club win one (is the loneliest number) Stanley Cup championship and keep coming back for more because they don’t want 1994 to last a lifetime.
And I don’t know if these Rangers particularly care, but this group putting on a collective sulk over perceived grievances is not only destroying the season. It is destroying their reputation, both as a group and one by one as individuals.
They are not going to be remembered for two conference finals and a Presidents’ Trophy within three seasons. They are going to be remembered for this.
You’d think that would count for something.
Down, not out
Coming up with six points out of a possible 26, as the Rangers have done
by going 3-10 since Nov. 21, is almost impossible in a league where teams get a point if they are tied after 60 minutes.
The last time the Rangers collected as few as six points over a 13-game stretch in the first half of a season came 35 years ago, when the 1989-90 club went 1-11-4 over a 16-game span from Dec. 9 to Jan. 10 bridging the new year.
That club recovered, though, going 7-1-2 over the next 10 and 20-10-5 the rest of the way to finish 36-31-13 before advancing to the second round of the playoffs.
This is a different year, a different team and different era.
But it is still December. The season is not lost. Laviolette must demand and enforce accountability across the board. Thirty games of giving benefit of the doubt is enough. Jersey numbers and not paycheck numbers must determine ice time. The Rangers must embrace structure. They must defend. The Rangers haven’t defended since Day 1.
But in order to regain any semblance of identity and any sense of self, the Rangers have to lose their entitlement. They have to stop embracing victimhood. They have to grow up.
They are professional athletes.
It is time for them to act that way.