I think we all would, for the right price,I'd honestly take a gamble on Puuijarvi
I think we all would, for the right price,I'd honestly take a gamble on Puuijarvi
I hear you. But Skjei is definitely a player who’ll be fine long term. He is amazingly talented. You see it on the pk. Where he doesn’t overthink things. That guy is terrific. And eventually he will figure it out. But I hear you. It’s frustrating waiting.Is this what you believe, or what you want the Rangers to put on the trade advertisement?
If Kreider goes to AVS, I wonder what would it take for Zadorov.
I hear you. But Skjei is definitely a player who’ll be fine long term. He is amazingly talented. You see it on the pk. Where he doesn’t overthink things. That guy is terrific. And eventually he will figure it out. But I hear you. It’s frustrating waiting.
If Kreider goes to AVS, I wonder what would it take for Zadorov.
This thread is truly a wasteland of unrealistic speculation. I'm not sure if it's boredom or just a complete lack of comprehension on what is grounded as a realistic transaction (likely both), I would make a push for two threads. One for reality, and another for video game trade talk.
If Kreider goes to AVS, I wonder what would it take for Zadorov.
But that is only near term. Right now, next year is painful, BUT they can afford to resign a few players and will have to make a trade or two. But if there is no buyout, then in two years time, they will suddenly have a good amount of cap space and flexibility.Huh? Buyouts save money. If they’re going to be really tight next year, the might need to do another one.
Yes, I understand that. But right now, it would be super tight and not without a player or two being traded, but then 2021 there would be plenty of cap space. So let's say that by trading Nametsnikov earlier, that opened up room to resign DeAngelo. Then one of Kreider or Buch would still need to be moved. But then in 2021, when the rest of the contracts come off the roster, there would be lots of cap room and flexibility. And they will need that as they look to resign some of their own players.TB- Buy-outs open up space next season.
Unless of course the package also includes a DeAngelo, which would juice a potential return.nothing against him but I really don't see us in the market for more dmen...enough young guys look legit with more on the way that it might take some patience but if i'm dealing for a dmen he has to be really good
nothing against him but I really don't see us in the market for more dmen...enough young guys look legit with more on the way that it might take some patience but if i'm dealing for a dmen he has to be really good
Yeah. Zadorov is valuable inasmuch as Tom Wilson was valuable to the Caps cup run. He’s a wildcard. And that can make a difference as a gimmick for a bit. But I’m not into it. I get it. But for my two cents, I’m not down.Just based on how well Hajek and Lindgren are playing I'd probably say 'no' to that. Although I do think he would be valuable in a bottom-pairing role, it's just too crowded at the moment.
I'd really like a young guy like Kaut
Unless of course the package also includes a DeAngelo, which would juice a potential return.
But that is only near term. Right now, next year is painful, BUT they can afford to resign a few players and will have to make a trade or two. But if there is no buyout, then in two years time, they will suddenly have a good amount of cap space and flexibility.
Puljujarvi has 18 points in 11 games overseas right now.
If you can get him at a buy low price you do it. He would certainly be an upgrade over McKegg and Smith on the wings.
Lindgren-Hajek-Skjei-Trouba can take PK duties.
I am not saying that the trade is DeAngelo for Zadarov. I am saying that if the desire is to land Zadarov among other goodies in a trade, then you could potentially include him in a potential trade in which Kreider is the centerpiece, and enhance the assets coming back.but then you are talking about a dmen much better than Zadorov...i'm not gonna say that our blueline can't possibly be upgraded, but I can say that we don't need more depth guys.
The second year hits on the two guys they'd consider buying out are pretty minimal. I don't think they'd buy out both, but buying out one might make a lot of sense, depending on what else happens.
Two years from now is near term too.
I'd be more inclined to buy out Staal due to his NMC and keep Smith around due to his versatility
Not that I’d expect him to, but Staal should just retire.