Machinehead
HFNYR MVP
Ruhwedel is better than both for sure.Is it a stretch to say Mancini and Ruhwedel are an upgrade on Trouba and Lindgren at this point?
Mancini was kinda f***in abysmal tbh.
I mean, he's not worse.
Ruhwedel is better than both for sure.Is it a stretch to say Mancini and Ruhwedel are an upgrade on Trouba and Lindgren at this point?
They thought he was going to get better with an increased role for *checks notes* some reason.What is truly wild is that we moved for Trouba before we fully knoew what Fox was going to be, with the intent of Trouba being the #1 defenseman on a cup contending team.
They thought he was going to get better with an increased role for *checks notes* some reason.
Like, forwards will score more points playing more minutes. Defensemen don't work like that.
For a short tourney I would absolutely stash Kreider on the 4th line to have the best net front PP guy in the league and one of the best PKers In the league on my team.I don't really find that surprising. They have lots of good 5v5 scorers already. Kreider as net front on PP1/key on the PK (with Trocheck( is likely much more valuable to them then having Caufield at 4th line wing and a second unit PP role.
Yeah, but he never played a #1 role. Dustin Byfuglien played north of 24 minutes a game on those teams.He was a solid two-way blue liner with a good shot on the power play and had leadership qualities, having worn an A in Winnipeg. And going the other way was Neal Pionk, whom was hated.
Oops.
The series was basically a microcosm of what the teams were. Hurricanes doing what they did with zone time and shot volume in place of quality and the Rangers getting the share of quality.
I don't need to rewrite history, I remember how that series went but it seems like you don't.
They controlled the 3rd period of game 6 which led directly to that comeback. They were in trouble had they lost that game but they didn't and it wasn't just Igor that won it for them. Carolina turtled and opened the door, but the Rangers tore it off the hinges and burned down their house. They 100% deserved to win that game.
Igor was kind of a dud in games 4 and 5 btw where he posted -GSAA's.
G4:MoneyPuck.com
G5: MoneyPuck.com
G4 in particular was very winnable. G5 was just a shit performance all around, they deserved what they got there.
Anyway this is off topic now and you don't seem interested in having an actual conversation in good faith so I'm out.
Yeah, but he never played a #1 role. Dustin Byfuglien played north of 24 minutes a game on those teams.
@Fitzy is right that that's the role we were planning on having him in.
What's the point in keeping Laviolette? The core quit on him. He's a garden gnome with a coach badge right now who polishes the knob of the vets who quit on him. How can they respect him after that? No meritocracy. How can the kids respect him? He has no ideas and no tools. A tough guy act from him now would make the players laugh at him.
Sure keep him just to keep a guy called Coach around and firing him is a bother mostly because they have to find a new guy, but this guy is toast.
Drury has caused this issue. They are not wrong. Toxic environment is what the Rangers are.
Giving a 3D, who's always been a 3D, 1D money and just saying "go ahead and do it" with no statistical basis whatsoever that he was going to progress is far-fetched.Giving people opportunities along with big money is normal and not far-fetched, though. The organization thought he had it in him. They were wrong. It happens.
Ruhwedel is better than both for sure.
Mancini was kinda f***in abysmal tbh.
I mean, he's not worse.
As doom and gloom things look, there are positives. The young wingers in this organization are promising. Laf, Kakko, Cuylle, Berard, Othmann, Perreault. It's why Panarin is going to come up in summer rumors.
It's why Kreider is getting rumored. Smith's name will pop up soon too.
Kakko is the same, but I'd like to think it's for a young defenseman or center and wouldn't be primarily futures as the premium asset. It's such a sore spot and could make them open to moving one of Mika/Troch.
It's also the guys that people actually want and have some value.
They thought he was going to get better with an increased role for *checks notes* some reason.
Like, forwards will score more points playing more minutes. Defensemen don't work like that.
Who is replacing him? And why are the players going to listen to the next coach? No wonder the Rangers give up at adversity, so do the fans lol
Don't get me wrong, I think Mancini has potential. He can skate, he can handle the puck. He was very impressive in the offensive zone.That was a really small sample for Mancini and he has all the tools we need. He's strong, he can skate, he can carry the puck up. He can get a wrist shot through. There's no way he was worse than the other 2 pylons in his limited action.
He was a solid two-way blue liner with a good shot on the power play and had leadership qualities, having worn an A in Winnipeg. And going the other way was Neal Pionk, whom was hated.
Don't get me wrong, I think Mancini has potential. He can skate, he can handle the puck. He was very impressive in the offensive zone.
We're not dealing with Lindgren here, who has like, UK league talent.
The problem is, Mancini has no concept whatsoever of how to defend in the pros, and given his resume, he wouldn't. I think a year in the A is going to be great for him.
And I'm not one of these people who think the A is a magical land and guys can't develop in the NHL, but it would be good for Mancini to have more minutes and a longer leash.
Reading comprehension is not your strongest suit.Neither do half the guys on this board- looking at all the people posting their ridiculous charts lmfao. One guy even tried to show how Zibinejad was good.
You got it backwards.
Keeping a Lame Duck Coach is showing fighting spirit how exactly?
Yeah, but he never played a #1 role. Dustin Byfuglien played north of 24 minutes a game on those teams.
@Fitzy is right that that's the role we were planning on having him in.
He reminds me of Schneider. Schneider always had the tools, but when he first started, he was bad defensively to the point of having to tie a bell to the guy he was covering (so is Trouba every damn game for 20 minutes, but I digress).Watching Mancini gives me the same feeling as Cuylle gave me last year. He's going to be a very good player, but d-men take longer. I think he could handle 3rd pair NHL minutes but Im game for an NHL caliber outside hire on defense.
Tyler Seguin is going on LTIR and is most likely done for the regular season. 4-6 months on the aggressive end gets you to the beginning of April.
This is an opportunity to make a move with a team that is in a similar spot to the Rangers in terms of team build.
The right side of their defense is not good. Old friend Nils Lundkvist is on the 3rd pair, but Matt Dumba (washed) and Lybushkin are the other RHD. They've got young forwards that could step up in their lineup. This might be a place where you can send Trouba.