Crease
Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
- Jul 12, 2004
- 24,553
- 27,013
Kakko's name has resurfaced. The Rangers won't trade him unless they get what they want.
The teams who’d make a trade for Igor are teams without much in the pipeline.Losing streak is at 4 games.
Team is 4th in the Metro with 6Pts behind the 3rd place team.
If the streak continues. And the club starts to fall off the playoff wildcard slot. What does the team then do with Igor? I mean, if you cant even get into a playoff spot, are you really going to sign sign him to the highest goaltender contract ever given out in the NHL?
Or, does Drury say this isnt happening and make him available. He would be a Haul for a club looking for a netminder.
I know but you never know. We have had some big time trades in our past. Would you consider it? I would.It's just a fantasy. It's not the real thing.
We could lend Mika and Kreider out to the Flying Fathers....I don't know who the f top shelf hockey is but I can tell you that what ever Kreider says has little impact one way or the other.
Teams are going to review his medicals and not just take his word for it. Plus that entire methodology would go out the window the second he returns to playing.
You don't have 10 forwards called the core to build around. We need to be a little more realistic here. If those 10 are penciled in to build around, we're lacking a lot of star power.
The teams who’d make a trade for Igor are teams without much in the pipeline.
Sure except that if we’re moving Igor it should be a top prospect guy.He’d be a rental so a deep pipeline wouldn’t really be necessary.
most teams have a 1st. Most of the contenders would have to part with their top prospect (and it won’t be a top 20 or even 30 guy) and another piece.
Pretty garden variety package for a top player at the deadline with the quality of the prospect being better than usual bc of the player being bought.
I would. Crosby and Malkin are infinitely better than krieder and zibsI know but you never know. We have had some big time trades in our past. Would you consider it? I would.
Rangers and Predators should be talking. Lauzon, Novak both guys the rangers have had interest in for years. Both would help. 2 teams that are disappointing.
Lauzon is terrible and the opposite direction of where they should be going.
Novak is good though.
or.........just get a D that doesn't suckLauzon would be an upgrade in the fact that he’s not a bitch like the rest of our D. If you’re going to suck at least stand up for yourself and the team.
Lauzon would be an upgrade in the fact that he’s not a bitch like the rest of our D. If you’re going to suck at least stand up for yourself and the team.
I would as well. The Pitt guys are older so we would only have a 1-2 year window but this way we wouldn't waste prime years of Laff, Bread, Igor and Fox. Would be interesting to have Karlsson as well. Plus Malkin is meaner than Zib/CK. I really enjoyed CK standing up to "Kachook" last season but that is very rare.I would. Crosby and Malkin are infinitely better than krieder and zibs
The only time him and Kreider see the boards are when they climb over them .has he won a single board/puck battle this season?
Drury ain’t gonna do shit
Just think about how Chris is gonna feel when he reads this
Not Fox.
Lafreniere I think has 8-10 team NTC when new contract kicks in
Trocheck goes from NMC to partial NTC next season
Or when they’re hugging leaving the iceThe only time him and Kreider see the boards are when they climb over them .