Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

Clark Kellogg

NYU Film Student
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2013
7,492
9,775
Vermont, USA
It started as an indictment on you for preferring Edstrom over Perreault
Thanks.
If we didn’t go all in for that last three TDL I would never want to trade Perreault.
Does Perreault have a huge upside over Edstrom? Yes, most definitely.
Do I agree that the organization should have gone all in three years in a row?
Absolutely not.
But they did.
So for the upcoming playoffs I don’t see any point in moving Edstrom or Cuylle.
Also I believe I said that if there was a chance of bringing in Vlasic from Chicago and part of the return included Perreault then he would not be untouchable.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rangersfansince08

CLW

Registered User
Nov 11, 2018
7,119
6,780
For everyone who is still hung up on giving Igor an extra half million or so, how have you enjoyed the season so far?

It’s been very enjoyable watching the best goaltender in hockey at the top of his game. Don’t ever forget that.

Way too much can happen in the last game of the season. Enjoy the whole season. You will be a lot less miserable.

We know this team will fart and ho-hum its way to the playoffs without breaking a sweat. It's the post season that's interesting to me.

I simply find the fact that the FO and the coaches have done F-all to fix the fundamental flaws this team has, the same flaws that has seen the team fizzle out most pathetically against the Devils and the Panthers rather... curious, to be polite. We had Shesty in those series too so paying him more isn't a fix of anything.
 

UnSandvich

Registered User
Sep 7, 2017
5,568
8,230
Thanks.
If we didn’t go all in for that last three TDL I would never want to trade Perreault.
Does Perreault have a huge upside over Edstrom? Yes, most definitely.
Do I agree that the organization should have gone all in three years in a row?
Absolutely not.
But they did.
So for the upcoming playoffs I don’t see any point in moving Edstrom or Cuylle.
Also I believe I said that if there was a chance of bringing in Vlasic from Chicago and part of the return included Perreault then he would not be untouchable.

"If we didn't go all in and empty our cupboard, I would never want to trade him. But now since the rest of it is pretty empty, f*** it we might as well get rid of our best prospect as well"
 

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,685
13,794
St. John's
Thanks.
If we didn’t go all in for that last three TDL I would never want to trade Perreault.
Does Perreault have a huge upside over Edstrom? Yes, most definitely.
Do I agree that the organization should have gone all in three years in a row?
Absolutely not.
But they did.
So for the upcoming playoffs I don’t see any point in moving Edstrom or Cuylle.
Also I believe I said that if there was a chance of bringing in Vlasic from Chicago and part of the return included Perreault then he would not be untouchable.

If a trade involved Vlasic and Perreault, Perreault would not be 'part of the return'; he would be the centrepiece.

And we'd need a lot more than even an early 2nd coming back with Vlasic to balance it out.
 

Siddi

Rangers Masochist
Mar 8, 2013
7,994
5,703
Global
Getting Kreider away from Mika is the first step in creating a better organized lineup. 2nd step is to leave Jones in the lineup. 3rd is to put Mika with Cuylle and Smith, kreider Chytil Kakko, panarin trochek laf, and Enstrom Carrick Vesey. Ignore the salaries and past performances, play your best players in the best spot to win
Mika had the highest xgf% among all forwards last game. Let him cook.
I thought last game was Mika's best game this season.
It was. Hopefully he builds on it.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,777
13,700
Elmira NY
For everyone who is still hung up on giving Igor an extra half million or so, how have you enjoyed the season so far?

It’s been very enjoyable watching the best goaltender in hockey at the top of his game. Don’t ever forget that.

Way too much can happen in the last game of the season. Enjoy the whole season. You will be a lot less miserable.

I agree. Igor has really been showing why he's a special player pretty much since the season started. He gives the Rangers an edge over pretty much any team in the league going into any given game.

I'd add this and I suspect a lot of people will not like reading it. If the Rangers were to let Igor go onto unrestricted free agency the cap imperatives to move on from both Trouba and Lindgren disappears. To me it's part of our future picture that these things all happen in conjunction with each other---Igor signs and the two defensemen move along to other teams.

We also don't really have an in house goaltender who is ready to take on a starters role. So no Igor and we'll have to find some lesser guy and he'll probably come at a fairly hefty cap number and he won't be nearly as good.

It doesn't make a lot of sense to me to move on from Igor. The team.....some media people and fans are probably going to just have to bite the bullet. Life's like that. Shit happens or in this case your arguably best player (it's between him and Artemi) gets paid.
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
16,055
14,822
I have quickly changed my tune from "Not a cent over 10mil" to "Give him a black check." Will be exciting to see if/for how long he can sustain this level of play.
Me too. I appreciate that with a lesser goalie the team would play tighter defense; a lot of the defensive lapses are due to the offense feeling entitled to attack with the Great Wall of Igor. But I also appreciate it’s way more fun watching the team be able to pay all-gas-no-break than having to go phalanx to shelter a lesser goalie. I can live with the occasion colossal defensive eff-up.
 

gravey9

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
2,940
6,295
Me too. I appreciate that with a lesser goalie the team would play tighter defense; a lot of the defensive lapses are due to the offense feeling entitled to attack with the Great Wall of Igor. But I also appreciate it’s way more fun watching the team be able to pay all-gas-no-break than having to go phalanx to shelter a lesser goalie. I can live with the occasion colossal defensive eff-up.
The big issue is... can we create enough offense in the playoffs when cheating doesn't work anymore and you have to come about your goal scoring by hard work, crashing the net and playing stout D? When we have come up against the top-top teams the last few years, this seems to have become our achilles heel.
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
16,055
14,822
The big issue is... can we create enough offense in the playoffs when cheating doesn't work anymore and you have to come about your goal scoring by hard work, crashing the net and playing stout D? When we have come up against the top-top teams the last few years, this seems to have become our achilles heel.
Sure. And that’s a reasonable question the organization has to work out. Do they open it up and then fall back to a playoff style in the spring? I’m sure that’s what the players want to do and personally I like it as a fan. It’s not easy of course. And when push comes to shove in April-May, how will they adjust. I personally think it’s feasible to treat the regular season differently from the playoffs. But I’m no expert.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eco's bones

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,777
13,700
Elmira NY
Sure. And that’s a reasonable question the organization has to work out. Do they open it up and then fall back to a playoff style in the spring? I’m sure that’s what the players want to do and personally I like it as a fan. It’s not easy of course. And when push comes to shove in April-May, how will they adjust. I personally think it’s feasible to treat the regular season differently from the playoffs. But I’m no expert.

I kind of think we're a deeper team this year than we have been at forward and on defense. We will probably fill the team out with a player or two at the deadline though we don't have a lot of draft capital. Those moves should be about making us a harder team to play against. The Panthers were a very hard team for us to play against in last year's playoffs. There's a long way between now and then. Our first test against them didn't turn out well for us but I don't think they're nearly as good or as deep this year.
 

Synergy27

F-A-C-G-C-E
Apr 27, 2004
13,815
12,846
Washington, D.C.
So Igor makes $6M now and we can’t play defense. How are we going to be able to play defense when he’s making double that?

If we’re not going to be able to play defense either way, why not just keep him?
 

lakeshirts37

Registered User
Jun 25, 2019
1,038
1,075
This image is from an article about the Canadians and Sharks but look at the Rangers at the far end of both visuals

View attachment 926266
this is from last year?

For everyone who is still hung up on giving Igor an extra half million or so, how have you enjoyed the season so far?

It’s been very enjoyable watching the best goaltender in hockey at the top of his game. Don’t ever forget that.

Way too much can happen in the last game of the season. Enjoy the whole season. You will be a lot less miserable.
For the record, I dont mind paying Igor his $$$ and yes he’s awesome to watch but he also masks a lot of deficiencies that are ultimately exposed in the playoffs - its been like this for over a decade. I want a legitimate contender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

HatTrick Swayze

Just Be Nice
Jun 16, 2006
17,276
11,118
Chicago
For everyone who is still hung up on giving Igor an extra half million or so, how have you enjoyed the season so far?

It’s been very enjoyable watching the best goaltender in hockey at the top of his game. Don’t ever forget that.

Way too much can happen in the last game of the season. Enjoy the whole season. You will be a lot less miserable.

I don’t think there’s ever been much debate that consistent goaltending allows teams to stack points in the regular season so not sure why anything would have changed.

If anything we’ve seen this defense has all the same flaws as last year, in overwhelming likelihood capping this team’s upside, which coupled with the goalie comps that have been signed makes paying Igor $11M+ actually seem more insane.
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
54,725
34,020
Brooklyn, NY

Machinehead and me after Rangers games when Shesterkin steals the win.

1730779485478.png


Machinehead you're the taller one.
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
54,725
34,020
Brooklyn, NY
Without Igor, you may never get that deep in the playoffs.

Yeah. I'm starting to turn into "pay the man his money". This is reminding me of the "blow it up for a Penguins/Blackhawks type dynasty". And then you get guys like Lafreniere who is good and may end up being great, but is no Crosby. And Kakko whose ceiling is good middle 6 winger. There's just no guarentee that letting Igor go and reallocating his salary will make us better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noncents

noncents

Registered User
Feb 25, 2022
1,457
1,840
Yeah. I'm starting to turn into "pay the man his money". This is reminding me of the "blow it up for a Penguins/Blackhawks type dynasty". And then you get guys like Lafreniere who is good and may end up being great, but is no Crosby. And Kakko whose ceiling is good middle 6 winger. There's just no guarentee that letting Igor go and reallocating his salary will make us better.
you don't let greatness go
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

Ad

Ad

Ad