Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

[majordomo]

Chychrun should have been the guy.

Weren't the Rangers one of the teams on his 10-team no trade list? I seem to recall seeing something where he said he would not come to NY.

 

[Clark Kellogg]

I’m going to stand on a soapbox here. I have been known to give a gentle jab at fellow posters and to this I apologize and hope to willfully not engage in that behavior moving forward.
Some members of our community have pushed away valuable poster over the years. The attack on Edge, the disgusting acquisition against the amazing kriederman and just recently the shade thrown at Rangersfan 1994.
Rangersfan 1994 was voted by his peers, “Rookie of the Year “ for a reason. He gives his time to scourer the internet to find all of us video content which benefits the group.
A majority of the time his video content posts go unappreciated.
If you don’t like someone’s opinion please consider either cordially disagreeing or not responding.
Degrading fellow posters seems self serving and doesn’t benefit our community. Once again to all the people I may have insulted, I apologize and hope to be a better contributor in the future.

 

[effen]

It's really not cool to dogpile on Rangerfan1994 because they want a gritty, tough team. They're allowed to have preferences.

Nobody mocks people for jerking off to PPG seasons 4th rounder overagers have in junior hockey even though they far outnumber and outpost someone like RF1994.

 

[duhmetreE]

Weren't the Rangers one of the teams on his 10-team no trade list? I seem to recall seeing something where he said he would not come to NY.

Maybe but I don’t remember seeing that

 

[noncents]

It's really not cool to dogpile on Rangerfan1994 because they want a gritty, tough team. They're allowed to have preferences.

Nobody mocks people for jerking off to PPG seasons 4th rounder overagers have in junior hockey even though they far outnumber and outpost someone like RF1994.

I’m going to stand on a soapbox here. I have been known to give a gentle jab at fellow posters and to this I apologize and hope to willfully not engage in that behavior moving forward.
Some members of our community have pushed away valuable poster over the years. The attack on Edge, the disgusting acquisition against the amazing kriederman and just recently the shade thrown at Rangersfan 1994.
Rangersfan 1994 was voted by his peers, “Rookie of the Year “ for a reason. He gives his time to scourer the internet to find all of us video content which benefits the group.
A majority of the time his video content posts go unappreciated.
If you don’t like someone’s opinion please consider either cordially disagreeing or not responding.
Degrading fellow posters seems self serving and doesn’t benefit our community. Once again to all the people I may have insulted, I apologize and hope to be a better contributor in the future.

I'll speak up here because I feel as though I'm among those you're speaking to, and also because i was passed over for Rookie of Year.

I feel we do a good job here of criticizing opinions instead of those presenting them, and keeping ribbing lighthearted and not bully-some.

I do however feel that while every hockey opinion is theoretically welcome, there should be a caveat that opinions should be somewhat based in something more than pure vitriol for a player - vitriol to the extent that there's not even a discussion happening, nor any desire to engage in one. It's just a constant spew of hateful criticism levied in the direction of one or more player, and it's often directly contradicted by every measurement we have available to us (except, in the case of one fellow here who thinks Adam Fox sucks, height and weight).

My opinion is that we have a responsibility to maintain a standard of discussion by way of self policing that sometimes can't help but appear to be dogpiling.

A preference for toughness over skill, to paraphrase, is not an opinion that anyone would reasonably hold as immediate grounds for dismissal. If it is, they should reflect on their own biases.

But harping over and over again that this guy sucks, should be waived, is useless, has no value, and exhibiting utter disinterest in any response to that or invitation to expound... after a while that will earn you a rep, and people will start responding to you a certain way. Imo that's a good thing - this isn't an abyss of anonymity like Twitter. Take responsibility for what you say.*

*Game threads are excluded here because when it's happening it can be difficult to be reasonable.

 

[GoAwayPanarin]

It's really not cool to dogpile on Rangerfan1994 because they want a gritty, tough team. They're allowed to have preferences.

Nobody mocks people for jerking off to PPG seasons 4th rounder overagers have in junior hockey even though they far outnumber and outpost someone like RF1994.

It'd be one thing if that were it but it really isn't.

Most of what I've seen is just the onslaught of manifesting negativity in any situation for no reason what so ever. Shit like that serves no purpose and thats what I see him getting called on more than the tuffness thing - He's far from the only person who wants that btw and he's not even the most egregious "tuffness" advocate/obsessor.

I know, I know, the ignore feature exists but personally, I try not to use it on people who are regulars on HFNYR here (and I haven't on him) but at a certain point, if you're going to act a certain way, you'd be a fool not to expect a certain kind of response.

To @Clark Kellogg's point though, theres no reason why he shouldn't feel welcomed here so I hope he comes back.