Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,248
8,944
Sounds like you’re the only one outraged here. Calm down dude. I didn’t insult your great ancestors. I disagreed with you on a hockey forum.

Trouba was unmovable, so not harping on that one. Lindgren could’ve been traded for draft capital and we could’ve had our pick of replacement level UFA for 1-2 Mil to play bottom pair. That’s the same caliber player as Ryan Lindgren for less than half the cost. Hell, we picked Gustafson up off the trash heap last year and he was better than Lindgren for 1/4 the cost.

if that happened, we would be in much better position to keep Mancini up, we would already have started accruing cap space for the deadline, and we would have more draft capital to trade for help at the deadline. It was absolutely malpractice not to move Lindgren in the offseason.

I’ve been a defender of Drury, but he really dropped the ball by not moving Lindgren .
Please don’t gaslight me. Here’s from your post I responded to:

“A secondary negative consequence of Drury failing to move Lindgren or Trouba this past summer.

Mancini has been better than Lindgren at a quarter of the price but we have to play Lindgren because of mismanagement. This is the kind of shit that stunts player development. Hard to keep up your self confidence when you don't even get rewarded for playing well.”

So again, please show me where you mentioned Mancini this summer?
Also the confidence thing is a lols - if Mancini were so fragile maybe he’s right for NHL altogether, no?
 

Kaapo Cabana

Next name: Admiral Kakkbar
Sep 5, 2014
5,106
4,322
Philadelphia
Please don’t gaslight me. Here’s from your post I responded to:

“A secondary negative consequence of Drury failing to move Lindgren or Trouba this past summer.

Mancini has been better than Lindgren at a quarter of the price but we have to play Lindgren because of mismanagement. This is the kind of shit that stunts player development. Hard to keep up your self confidence when you don't even get rewarded for playing well.”

So again, please show me where you mentioned Mancini this summer?
Also the confidence thing is a lols - if Mancini were so fragile maybe he’s right for NHL altogether, no?
I didn’t. That’s why I said SECONDARY negative consequences. Again, relax, it’s not all about you. You’re gonna give yourself a heart attack.

If Drury would have done the obvious right thing in moving Lindgren and backfilling through free agency, we would be in much better shape right now with the cap, and draft capital.

That’s independent of Mancini breaking out. the fact that Lindgren is now blocking what looks like a good young player is a secondary negative effect of that mismanagement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

majordomo

Registered User
Oct 29, 2023
2,019
1,641
NYC
I didn’t. That’s why I said SECONDARY negative consequences. Again, relax, it’s not all about you. You’re gonna give yourself a heart attack.

If Drury would have done the obvious right thing in moving Lindgren and backfilling through free agency, we would be in much better shape right now with the cap, and draft capital.

That’s independent of Mancini breaking out. the fact that Lindgren is now blocking what looks like a good young player is a secondary negative effect of that mismanagement.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that Lindgren was still recovering from his season ending injury. I can't imagine any team trading any assets for him (no matter how minor) without some indication that he was a functioning player again.
 

Kaapo Cabana

Next name: Admiral Kakkbar
Sep 5, 2014
5,106
4,322
Philadelphia
Maybe I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that Lindgren was still recovering from his season ending injury. I can't imagine any team trading any assets for him (no matter how minor) without some indication that he was a functioning player again.
I disagree. I do think there was (and still is) a market out there for him.
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,191
20,943
Lindgren is an undersized 3rd pair PK specialist on any team that isnt the Rangers. He doesnt have any significant trade value. The Rangers best bet in a potential trade is taking advantage of a team that values his intangibles.
I can't see him being traded. He's more of a self-rental. Our defensive depth isn't great as it is. Drury isn't going to further weaken it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atax and McRanger92

Kaapo Cabana

Next name: Admiral Kakkbar
Sep 5, 2014
5,106
4,322
Philadelphia
Lindgren is an undersized 3rd pair PK specialist on any team that isnt the Rangers. He doesnt have any significant trade value. The Rangers best bet in a potential trade is taking advantage of a team that values his intangibles.
I think the “warrior” label is why there would be a market for him. Even though I don’t disagree with the 3rd pair caliber assessment, he was playing 1st pair minutes. By the virtue of that fact I believe he has higher trade value than maybe he should.

There are plenty of “character, things and stuff” GMs out there who would want to add a guy like that. Especially with a year of salary control which we can no longer use as leverage
 
  • Like
Reactions: McRanger92

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,272
20,803
I can't see him being traded. He's more of a self-rental. Our defensive depth isn't great as it is. Drury isn't going to further weaken it.

Probably right. They could trade him for an upgrade though. Jones and Ruhwedel are good depth with Mancini and an actual top 4 LD in the mix.
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,191
20,943
Probably right. They could trade him for an upgrade though. Jones and Ruhwedel are good depth with Mancini and an actual top 4 LD in the mix.
The only teams that would trade us an upgrade are ones who will miss the playoffs. Why would any of those teams want Lindgren, who will be a pending UFA?

Maybe there's a bigger deal to be made where we get a young, cost-controlled dman and Lindgren is simply part of the cap balancing, but there's no way he'd be a main part of the deal.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,272
20,803
The only teams that would trade us an upgrade are ones who will miss the playoffs. Why would any of those teams want Lindgren, who will be a pending UFA?

Maybe there's a bigger deal to be made where we get a young, cost-controlled dman and Lindgren is simply part of the cap balancing, but there's no way he'd be a main part of the deal.

I mean Lindgren is still only 26. A bottom feeder team theoretically might have a need for a long term answer for his defensive play and leadership. It really is a shame because if Lindgren was 3 inches taller he'd be perfect.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,892
10,575
I had a dream last night that we made the 12.5m offer to Shesterkin and he signed at 1:00pm today with a scheduled press conference. I hate having nightmares...
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,191
20,943
Chychrun should have been the guy.

Now? it's slim pickings unfortunately. Maybe coerce Vegas into moving Theodore? A guy like Walman from San Jose?
Both Chychrun and Theodore will likely cost too much on their next contract. We might be able to fit Walman, who has 1 year left on his contract @ 3.4 mil.
 

hardnosed

Registered User
Feb 27, 2017
1,512
1,470
Way to get baselessly outraged! This is the second time I see this hindsight 20/20 post on this “mismanagement” point in the last two days. Please show me your posts or for that matter anyone’s this summer who penciled Mancini into the the varsity roster (bern doesn’t count).

If Drury were to move Trouba / Lindgren this summer do you think for a second he wouldn’t go out and find immediate replacement?

Miller - Fox
X - Schneider
Jones - X

Where Xs would be players brought from outside. And you know what you’d do - be outraged that Drury got them and them blocking Mancini now. Good luck!
There were guys on here that wanted to replace Lindgren or Trouba this summer from within, not with Mancini but with Scanlin. That didn't work out too well.
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,014
4,856
There were guys on here that wanted to replace Lindgren or Trouba this summer from within, not with Mancini but with Scanlin. That didn't work out too well.
I think people would be surprised that there’s actually a talent gap between Trouba/Lindgren and a guy like scanlin, and how bad that would end up being.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,248
8,944
There were guys on here that wanted to replace Lindgren or Trouba this summer from within, not with Mancini but with Scanlin. That didn't work out too well.
I bet these guys watched 5% of Scanlin's games over whatever reasonable stretch.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad