Toggle sidebar

Speculation: Roster Building Thread Part XIII: Have no fear, the TDL is near (Mod Post page 233, #5809 - READ IT)

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
NYR Viper said:
I won't lie I like Martin. The guy brings it every game and he's a nice guy to have around some younger players. He also drives hard to the net and understands his role. IMO, he's the type of player who can help a team on a night when they are lacking energy, something this team sorely needs and something I think the younger guys should see when they inevitably come up. ENERGY.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, all that too. We had a front row seat to him for years.
 
mrmovies779 said:
No reason to sign Kovalchuk when we need to get younger and cheaper.It's a waste signing a player of his stature if you quite possibly won't have a contending team for a few years
Click to expand...

Its not a waste at all.

We should have plenty of cap space freed up, given the likely trades that are coming. Also, there's been talk of resigning Nash, resigning Grabner, why wouldn't we want to add a better player who likely can be had for less years? We don't have good enough forwards to get rid of Zuccarello, Nash, Grabner, and not replace them. Who do you want taking their spots? Lettieri? Vesey? These players are lucky if they can stick in the NHL, they certainly are not replacing top 6 forwards next season. There will be room to have those players on the team, and add a player like Kovalchuk. Also, it could help lure Shestyorkin into signing, and gives Buchnevich another Russian on the team who he knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99 and EdJovanovski
Pavel Buchnevich said:
Its not a waste at all.

We should have plenty of cap space freed up, given the likely trades that are coming. Also, there's been talk of resigning Nash, resigning Grabner, why wouldn't we want to add a better player who likely can be had for less years? We don't have good enough forwards to get rid of Zuccarello, Nash, Grabner, and not replace them. Who do you want taking their spots? Lettieri? Vesey? These players are lucky if they can stick in the NHL, they certainly are not replacing top 6 forwards next season. There will be room to have those players on the team, and add a player like Kovalchuk. Also, it could help lure Shestyorkin into signing, and gives Buchnevich another Russian on the team who he knows.
Click to expand...
Just because we have the cap space doesn't mean we should spend it like Sather would.Kovalchuk won't be putting us over the top,we don't need him.Bring in young talented players and let the chips fall where they may.
 
aufheben said:
I'm oddly not against this. Depends on the money and term.
Click to expand...
Yeah, one of those situations where you have a player apparently motivated to play for the Rangers. Let him prove it.

edit: I mean prove his motivation in his salary demands.
 
Who says Kovalchuk is a better player today than Nash or Grabner? Where's the evidence of that? Both our guys play much better 3 zone hockey, I'll say that.

Kovy has scored goals in the KHL? Great. Nigel Dawes has produced him 5 straight seasons. That doesn't tell us anything.
 
As long as they sign Kovalchuk to a one year deal so they can sell him as a rental next deadline, I'm okay with it.

They need to commit, if this is just a one year sell off and next year they are in the wildcard hunt and they start self renting, renting on top again, this whole thing ends up a cobbled together mishmash not too different from when they had Jagr, his buddies, Lundqvist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTakedown
Kovulchuk? Isn’t he 50? What’s with the obsession with KHL players on this forum? Is there a facepalm meme I can use
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kovalev27
You can't throw a bunch of 18 and 19 years olds on the ice and have it work. See Arizona and Buffalo and to a certain extent Edmonton. Sometimes I think this fanbase was permanently damaged from 98-04 when they had old high paid teams and other franchises were pointing fingers and laughing at us (fanbase not Rangers) and the Rangers drafting. Those days are over. As a fanbase we went from just being excited that Ryan Hollweg worked hard ("Hey, he's Young!") all the way to AV taking a fairly young team deep several times. It's ok to have some old guys to help the young guys develop. Look at what Feds did for Boyle, Prust, and Mitchell in 2010-11 and 2011-12.

If the money AND term aren't killer, Kovaclhuk would be fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rangers_23 and EdJovanovski
Depending on the deal, if Kovy has his heart set on NY I’d consider it, but not if Nash/Grabner return. We don’t have room to bring back the exact same roster next year. The entire point of this “retool/rebuild” is too change the makeup. If we bring back Nash and Grabner, say we do trade Zucc but we start next season with Nash, Grabner, Kreider, Zib, Buch, Hayes, Miller, Fast, Vesey, Lettieri, Nieves, etc. than we are essentially the same team. Swapping Kovy into Zucc’s spot and scratching one of Vesey/Lettieri/Nieves for a rookie Chytil or LA doesn’t really change the mix by much. I am against bringing back both of Nash/Grabner. If we sign one I’d be 50/50 on Kovy. If we don’t bring either back, I am pretty open to it depending on the $$/years. He may be a good mentor to Buch and teach Zibby how to utilize that shot on the PP even better. Otherwise, I could pass just as easily.
 
Fitzy Duke of NY said:
Who says Kovalchuk is a better player today than Nash or Grabner? Where's the evidence of that? Both our guys play much better 3 zone hockey, I'll say that.

Kovy has scored goals in the KHL? Great. Nigel Dawes has produced him 5 straight seasons. That doesn't tell us anything.
Click to expand...

So you are saying that we have no idea of how Kovalchuk is because he doesn't play in the NHL? We must also have no idea how good Shestyorkin is, how good Chytil is, how good Andersson is.

Nash and Grabner are on pace for like 40 points, you really don't think Kovalchuk would be able to produce that?
 
You know, knee jerk reaction to Kovalchuk was "oh god no" but I like the arguments here, it does make a lot of sense as long as he doesn't want a crazy deal. I'm convinced.
 
Clearly it’s a long con to have Kovy be here as a mentor for Shesty AND Gusev when we trade for him with Vegas
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trxjw
Pavel Buchnevich said:
So you are saying that we have no idea of how Kovalchuk is because he doesn't play in the NHL? We must also have no idea how good Shestyorkin is, how good Chytil is, how good Andersson is.

Nash and Grabner are on pace for like 40 points, you really don't think Kovalchuk would be able to produce that?
Click to expand...

I don't think, even if he outscored them slightly, that Kovalchuk would provide nearly the benefit to the lineup that those two provide. And at a likely higher AAV, as well.

Kovy has a much higher risk, and I don't know anyone who thinks he's going to go right back to scoring 40 goals a season.
 
Nopuckluck said:
Kovulchuk? Isn’t he 50? What’s with the obsession with KHL players on this forum? Is there a facepalm meme I can use
Click to expand...

Facepalm-meme-8-300x220.jpg


Careful. This is a powerful weapon and can be used against you.
 
I wouldn't be against Kovalchuk if the term is 1 or 2 years. I still think the Rangers are going to try to put together a solid team next seaso so I wouldn't be surprised if they sign him and one of Nash/Grabner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski
No doubt they'll need some vets, but with that comes a possible wild card team. Which is fine if they stick to a rebuilding course, if that is what they are choosing to do now there is no reason to reverse course just because they may be one of the 16 teams who may make the playoffs next season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom