- Sep 20, 2007
- 7,588
- 11,265
Thanks for this - will assume all is correct above. Florida D is bigger - by a marginal amount, maybe not worth noting(hard to tell, you could split this by minutes played and I think it tells a different story). This core was beaten up and folded in that series. Now replace Gus with Zac Jones who makes Adam Fox look huge. You can see where I'm going here. Getting smaller is not the answer. That said, the point about mindset, ability and even health(Fox was banged up, other guys too), is definitely a valid point. I think both points can be true.Using the 6 from game 6 and their H/W from Hockey-reference:
- The Panthers D weighs 20 pounds more than the Rangers (1205lb to 1195lb)
- The average weight is 199.16 v 200.83
- Ekblad and Miller are tied for heaviest (215)
- Fox is lightest (182), Forsling is 2nd lightest at (186)
If you try to pair them up for comparison
Miller (215) v Ekblad (215)
Schneider (208) v Mikkola (209)
Trouba (203) v Kulikov (201)
Gus (197) v OEL (200)
Lindgren (190) v Montour (194)
Fox (182) v Forsling (186)
Pound for pound there really isn't anything between the two groups that would make me think the Rangers are undersized when it comes to D. Mindset, ability and game plan seem more telling.
Height wise (and I may have stuffed this up because feet/inches is bloody stupid):
- Panthers D average height is 6ft 1.5in v Rangers 6ft 1.3in
- Miller is the tallest D (6,5), Ekblad and Mikkola are 6,4
- Fox is the smallest (5,11), there are 4 D-men (2 for each team) at 6ft
Again, nothing splits these guys. the only real outlier from a body composition perspective is Fox (and even then, barely)
All this to be said...I like Zac Jones. I think he's a good hockey player with a future in the NHL. Just not sure he's the answer for this team, right now. If some guys are juggled around, perhaps the math is different.
Last edited: