Is this true? That his value is sky high?no but Rempe's value is sky high. he'd bring back the most.
This is a pretty sober take from Brooks, all things considered. But I think he ends up there with some odd logic. We shouldn't worry about the cap hit because the Rangers have historically relied disproportionately on goaltending to compete.Igor Shesterkin’s deadline for record contract with Rangers is nothing to fret over
This may represent an attempt by Shesterkin’s party to create additional leverage, but in reality this changes nothing.nypost.com
Great article by Brooks, agree with this 100%.
I guess it's true in a sense that if previously his value was a 7th round pick, now it might be a 4th round pickIs this true? That his value is sky high?
Does Lindgren have a concussion or is it the shoulder again?
It’s not Othmann hate.Seems like there's some Othmann hate on here since last season. Not sure why? He seems to be developing nicely. What I like is he seems to be a player that has some bite to his game. He can score goals. Can he do it at the NHL level is yet to be seen but seems like he is a very solid prospect for the Rangers that is closer then most (from a Forward perspective) to getting his chance. He's thrown the body real well in 2 preseason games. Dropped the mitts.
Berard has the label of being a real pest. A tough to play against type of forward. I think showed that n the World Jr games. Got small icetime last night. Just about 10 mins. No hits, no shots on goal. Coughed up the puck 3 times last night. Didn't stand out much. Hoping for a better showing in the next game if they let him play.
Big props to Edstrom. Starting with the rookie series, and into last night. Goal and an assist, with 4 hits on the night. He's noticeable. Keeps getting mentioned. I like the team with him suited up.
noy'all keep trying to trade kakko for young D with upside. nobody values Kakko.
hot take: trade Rempe for young D with upside.
you have Edström right there to fill that role.
Rempe would probably bring back the most.no but Rempe's value is sky high. he'd bring back the most.
and they do have the same role? 4th line wing.
Literally stop trying to make 'Mantis' happen it's not a thing
yes on mancini
MOVE JACOB TO LD BRING IN MY PAISANO VITTORIO
no one is fully untouchable, no one, there are no sacred cowsThey don't have the same role though...
Of course none of KK, Rempe or Ed is untouchable, it all depends on what is coming back.
Why do you want to trade a guy who, result of him being in lineup, = winning most of those games?no but Rempe's value is sky high. he'd bring back the most.
and they do have the same role? 4th line wing.
Literally stop trying to make 'Mantis' happen it's not a thing
Rempe is not yet good enuf to be dominant factor in elevating higher in lineup, but he has way more upside than being given credit for, and we see already real chem w/Eds.Even optimistic views of Rempe have him topping out as a 4th liner. Nobody is trading any # defenseman for him.
I don't WANT to trade any of those guys. I'm merely open to it if the deal favors this team.yes on mancini
no on jt to ld
he's having enuf issues as is, swtching to off handedness not gonna help
jt to 4RW
Eds - Rem - Trou
no one is fully untouchable, no one, there are no sacred cows
that said, barring an unexpected crazy offer, KK has most value growing here as we wait for bread and his 11+m to exit
and there is no reason to trade 'RempEd'
It makes way more sense to keep RempEd together and see if the correct W w/scoring ability can make that enuf of a line it can elevate the whole line up from 4th to 3rd to start
Why do you want to trade a guy who, result of him being in lineup, = winning most of those games?
There are guys better keeping and others better selling.
Remp
Ed
are keepers
STOP W/FOOOLISH WIN NOW
Rempe is not yet good enuf to be dominant factor in elevating higher in lineup, but he has way more upside than being given credit for, and we see already real chem w/Eds.
Keep together, find ideal W for them
Usually trades cost, gotta be careful
Othmann is 21 and has had one season in the minors. The fact that he isn't NHL ready yet does not really concern me. Plenty of players aren't ready until they are 23-24 and still contribute just fine.It’s not Othmann hate.
It’s that he’s a year younger than Laf, but doesn’t look ready for the nhl and there’s a concern he might not be.
Neither he or berard showed me enough last night to pencil them in a top 9 role.
Vesey is slotted for the empty Panarin spot today, and that’s horrifying.
To avenge a hit on a guy that returned 10 minutes later.Lindgren starting off his contract year with a meaningless fight that puts him out of commission for weeks. The jokes write themselves.
Chad playing LD is interesting. I can see him being in the opening night lineup
vasi also won his first Cup before the $9.5 mil contract i believe. And won his second in yr one of that contract. It was also before TB had to start giving out their big contracts to key players some of which are now gone bc of cap problems.This is a pretty sober take from Brooks, all things considered. But I think he ends up there with some odd logic. We shouldn't worry about the cap hit because the Rangers have historically relied disproportionately on goaltending to compete.
3 of 11 banners in the franchise's history are goalies. Guess how many cups that trio won.
On his other point: the two teams who won with inordinate goalie cap hits recently (Tampa and Florida) have another important commonality that Brooks often brings up: they're both Floridian, ie. "no-tax" teams. Forsling, a guy who was in Conn Smythe contention, just signed for less than 6mil a year in Florida for christ's sake.
Obviously the Rangers will sign Igor and to a cap hit over 10.5 a year, but it will very likely be a mistake. Everything about the history of the league and this franchise in particular tells us that.
Chad playing LD is interesting. I can see him being in the opening night lineup
Othmann for a TDL rental would be a terrible idea.
If we deal Othmann, it'd be more like a McGroaty / Yager deal or an upgrade for an established roster player.
Since when have the Rangers done what they should do from a roster or cap management perspective?Edstrom is 2 years older than Rempe, he should look better. I'm not sure why it's an either/or thing. They should both play.
Not really surprised
the mantis thing not directed at you. that's why there was a paragraph breakRempe would probably bring back the most.
They kind of play the same position, one is a LW one is a RW, they do NOT have the same role. Or bring the same thing to the line.
I don't know what "Mantis" means, but I'm not trying to make ANYTHING happen. In any case don't tell me what to do! Hahaha. I merely give my opinions which are no more, nor LESS, valid than your own...
guess againSince when have the Rangers done what they should do from a roster or cap management perspective?
I'm not saying it should be one or the other. I'm saying it will be.