The hockey advanced stats guys are starting to put their 2018-19 models/projections out.
Rangers are the 2nd worst team in the NHL in this model. 75 points. They had 77 points last season.
There's a reason why a lot of posters who used to post here don't post anymore. And it's because they pointed this out, backed it up with new metrics people didn't like, and essentially got chased from the boards.
So, no. It may have been obvious to you, but it was not obvious to everyone.
I'm not having a hard time believing that we will be a bottom 5 team. I have a very hard time understanding why Boston is at the top and how Ottawa is above us.
Or because they had a pompous, holier than thou attitude that people didn't like.![]()
For sure, but when you're debating with facts against other people's subjectivity, it's hard to not act like you're right... because you are![]()
Why did you beat my edit stop being so fast.Statistics are a tool to help paint a picture of a player. Not all statistics are properly even relevant. I think that is sometimes forgotten by those who live and die on the hill that is statistical analysis in hockey specifically.
I know Boston is good. I just don't believe they are likely to finish with the most points.Boston is good. They weren't too far off from being the best team in the league (Regular season) Last year.
Ottawa is a mess, but I'd imagine that what ever went into the projection is banking on Anderson to bounce back to a level of respectability and for EK to be EK for the entire season.
The harsh reality that no one wants to face: Ottawa needs fewer things to bounce their way in order to be competitive than the Rangers do.
Boston is good. They weren't too far off from being the best team in the league (Regular season) Last year.
Ottawa is a mess, but I'd imagine that what ever went into the projection is banking on Anderson to bounce back to a level of respectability and for EK to be EK for the entire season.
The harsh reality that no one wants to face: Ottawa needs fewer things to bounce their way in order to be competitive than the Rangers do.
Well, that is the thing. When most of these metrics were brand new, it wasn't unreasonable for people to be skeptical on their legitimacy and usefulness.For sure, but when you're debating with facts against other people's subjectivity, it's hard to not act like you're right... because you are![]()
As one of those skeptics, I definitely do. Girardi wars 4 lyfe.Well, that is the thing. When most of these metrics were brand new, it wasn't unreasonable for people to be skeptical on their legitimacy and usefulness.
You know what I mean?
Why did you beat my edit stop being so fast.
speed/60 off the charts
Former future Ranger Antoine Vermette.Curious as to who you all believe the Rangers will target for training camp PTOs. Thoughts?
Well, that is the thing. When most of these metrics were brand new, it wasn't unreasonable for people to be skeptical on their legitimacy and usefulness.
You know what I mean?
I know Boston is good. I just don't believe they are likely to finish with the most points.
I don't know that I agree about Ottawa. In fact, I strongly disagree. Their forward group is a joke. Their only real forward threat, Stone, will likely be traded/walk away. Duchene is horribly overrated. Karlsson will be gone and their defense also is a joke. Chabot will be good but they are a dumpster fire.
They, like us, have an aging goalie but we have a significantly better goaltending pipeline (we have an overall better prospect pool) than they do. I don't disagree with you often but I personally believe there is no argument that Ottawa is the worst team now and will be the worst team for a very long time.
Nick Shore plz.Curious as to who you all believe the Rangers will target for training camp PTOs. Thoughts?
How so? Ottawa's locker room is a complete mess, their forward core is worse and Anderson was one of the worst goaltenders last year. I really think with a new coach this team could be competitive.
Got to imagine he's a top target right after Nakladal.Nick Shore plz.
Their high end forwards are better and they have a game changer in EK if he stays. Their toxic locker room situation has been solved now with the booting of Hoffman.
Again, I think the damage has been done with EK and even if he stays, that cloud will hang over them, but they really need 3 or 4 things to go their way, we need like double that.
The coaching change is not magic pixie dust for us. I like the change and am hopeful that it will go well, but I dont expect it to happen over night, we don't have the roster for it.
I'm not having a hard time believing that we will be a bottom 5 team. I have a very hard time understanding why Boston is at the top and how Ottawa is above us.
Your usernameGot to imagine he's a top target right after Nakladal.![]()
Our dream is over, nobody can resist a good beach.