Synergy27
F-A-C-G-C-E
The issue with Kakko was, and remains, that he was touted as the most NHL ready prospect in awhile. There’s been a lot of discussion about how Kakko would out produce Hughes early in their career as Jack grew into manhood.I get that. And I think for our fanbase, Kakko's season hit particularly hard, just by the fact that we'd literally never drafted that high before. We finally get one, and it looks like a flop right out the gate (also probably bringing memories of Pavel Brendl, our only OTHER top 5 draft pick at that point). But Kakko did show flashes. And the number of games he played (both NHL and other) likely took a toll. And the fact that he looked much better in the bubble (after a rest) and to start this season bodes well. I do get the frustration. Finally getting a top pick only for that kid to struggle HARD as a rookie has got to be the most "Rangers" thing ever. But I honestly think people took that and emotionalized the whole thing--took it personally. The odds are still VERY good that Kakko will develop into an excellent player. We just need to give it time (and maybe a different coach who is better at communicating).
Getting shit on by Hughes 3 games into his second season while Kakko still looks undercooked is a rational cause for alarm.
I can buy the argument that NYC fans aren’t patient enough for real rebuilds, but when the “accelerated” rebuild enabled by lottery gifted top 2 picks still looks questionable I don’t think that’s a patience thing. It’s reasonable to expect top 2 picks to make immediate impacts, if not to inconsistently show flashes of future dominance.
Kakko’s NHL career has been a combination of him looking really bad with flashes of being a decent player. It’s reasonable to be a little worried about him.