KirkAlbuquerque
#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
because 50% retained is still double what he ended up getting11 teams interested and not one will do 50% retained for the remainder of his deal
****ing unbelievable.
because 50% retained is still double what he ended up getting11 teams interested and not one will do 50% retained for the remainder of his deal
****ing unbelievable.
He had 11 teams approach him with some offering two year deals. I find it very hard to believe this was the best deal for him money wise. But it's a good career move.because 50% retained is still double what he ended up getting
If our left defense depth makes large steps this season, I believe skjei is next to be moved either at the deadline or draft.The Rangers like to give nice deals to questionable players and they are too doubtful of strong talent, if I had to make a totally baseless assumption about why they give contracts the way they do.
Hayes should not have been bridged because even if he stagnated he was still worth the deal he'd have gotten in dollars, and barring an outrageous decline would have had suitors if we wanted to move on.
Stepan was handled well. Kreider maybe could've gotten a few more years but was handled well. McDonagh and Zibanejad were grand slams.
Skjei's contract is awful. Not because he's bad but he makes a lot of money for how little he does. You could find a slightly worse Skjei for half the value, or less. The Rangers really like overpaying tweeners that "leave you wanting more" while they continually have doubts about clear talent.
Again, idk what conversations are going on behind closed doors and these are negotiations, but from what I can tell a great first step would be to stop giving big checks to mediocre players.
I would have gone back to Colorado. That team has a chance to be special. TB has failed so many times and they are still so soft.
If our left defense depth makes large steps this season, I believe skjei is next to be moved either at the deadline or draft.
he's a limited, unimpressive player that makes a lot of money.And what is the logic behind trading skjei?
I think probably pretty fair to say the FO has a chip on its shoulder too
he's a limited, unimpressive player that makes a lot of money.
This has been thoroughly documented and hinted on. There was no one that was trading for him.11 teams interested and not one will do 50% retained for the remainder of his deal
****ing unbelievable.
Agreed. And maybe he should do a little more soul searching to see how he was playing which made the choice on how to create space an easy one for Gorton.What does a player like Shattenkirk with a chip on his shoulder even look like?
I like the guy, but he’s definitely not a heart on his sleeve type.
he's a limited, unimpressive player that makes a lot of money.
I think probably pretty fair to say the FO has a chip on its shoulder too
Agreed. And maybe he should do a little more soul searching to see how he was playing which made the choice on how to create space an easy one for Gorton.
Smith, maybe not. Staal? This has been debated to death, but it's not like one greatly outperformed the other. Chances are that Staal fills the veteran leadership, elder statesman role and Smith is the 12th forward/7th defenseman. Once Fox was traded for, the Rangers had their 3 RD defenseman. The music stopped and there were no chairs available to Shattenkirk.The only reason Shatty should have been chosen was for the immediate cap space and the inability to make a trade right now
Let’s be real, not sure any rational person looks at Staal, Smith and him and says “yup Shattenkirk is the worst player of this group, he should go”
If our kids Lindgren etc prove they can hold down positions, skjei can be moved for a #2 center or 1st rounder. I don’t get the feeling he’s gonna progress further to the point of great value. It’s the old Montreal model. Be able to cash in on assets that aren’t significant enough to continue to invest in.And what is the logic behind trading skjei?
He’s really a good skater and can recover well but at some point he has to be able make less mistakes so he doesn’t have to recover in the first place. Good kid but unless he gets a mentor to work on his confidence to attack and vision to make better plays with the puck, I don’t yet see him as dynamic.he's a limited, unimpressive player that makes a lot of money.