The Rangers are not giving Shattenkirk 7 years.
7 years would be a disaster contract for the Rangers. Stay far away.
The Rangers are not giving Shattenkirk 7 years.
Obviously. Especially since Chicago would need it more than they do.Jimmy, why would the Yotes trade #7 for just a pick lower in the first round and for a player who will likely never play again?
There is more to it than that.
I don't know why this would stop them from trading for Stepan, but okay.
7 years would be a disaster contract for the Rangers. Stay far away.
What does Chicago have that allows them to get the 7th?
I would think Hitchcock wouldn't want him because he's seen him up close and exposed the fraud of right-handed Yandle.Buffalo is interested in Shattenkirk. Maybe Dallas. Hitchcock connection.
they are likely trading that 7 to get to the cap floor. AZ doesn't want to trade their assets of players. They are going to go find a cheaper RH C.
Why would ARZ be the team overpaying? If anyone has to overpay its the hakws.
Show me to a link of any team interested in Stepan. Not "teams are interested" specific teams like with AZ.With the way their fans have acted, I hope its Seabrook
Their fans don't want to.
This deal alone may not be enough to get them to the floor, they're 13 million under.
You're also making a pretty big assumption that other teams aren't in on Stepan.
I love Shattenkirk but I'm not touching him with a 10ft stick if he's commanding 7 years.
And I never understood who he was really bidding against to acquire Staal.
Show me to a link of any team interested in Stepan. Not "teams are interested" specific teams like with AZ.