Roster Building/Team Building/Future Trade/Drafting thread. | Page 282 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Roster Building/Team Building/Future Trade/Drafting thread.

If this team once again fails to proceed very far in the playoffs, what would you want them to do?

  • Do nothing, run it back

    Votes: 23 10.6%
  • Make changes to the offense, top 6 forward, better bottom six, but keep the core

    Votes: 14 6.5%
  • Make changes to the offense, including moving core players

    Votes: 82 38.0%
  • Make changes to the defense

    Votes: 14 6.5%
  • Do a retool, including moving core players

    Votes: 103 47.7%
  • Ban the guy who keeps making jinx prediction posts.

    Votes: 25 11.6%

  • Total voters
    216
For me, the Marchand deal looks like $7m cap hit with $2.5m in performance bonuses and $12M upfront signing bonus this July 1st.

Normally, I wouldn't want a 4th year, but actually having a 4th year might make a buyout more friendly (if there is a fair bit of money in that 4th year), if it comes to it, given LTIR isn't an option.


Edit: The variance between salary and signing bonus might be too high here, so perhaps only $10 m.
 
3 team player list that Hertl can get traded too. If Toronto isn't on that list, what can you do... If Toronto is on that list, then they most definitely should be kicking tires on him.

Also take the Marchand rumor with a grain of salt.

He has a 28 team NTC? Damn, I did not know that.
 
4 x 9 seems like a terrible deal.
It is, I really dont want him on the team.

Sucks we couldn't find a way to win and look like we will have to resort to bringing in Marchand a guy we have all hated and whose owned us bad.

Id rather just go the CAR approach and sign a bunch of 3rd liners for 1-2 year deals at reasonable cap hits then give a gross over pay to any UFA this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMLAM34 and ACC1224
This has 460k cap space left over and I am just piggybacking off the Hertl stuff because it is kinda quiet for the Leafs right now;

1750783375271.png

1750783388420.png

1750783401755.png
 
You would kick the bonus money to the next year in overages, and with the cap going up, it would be less of a strain.

Also, if he doesn't achieve the bonus, for whatever reason, the cap hit will hopefully be less of an issue because if it's an injury issue, I don't think we can bury him on LTIR, given that he signed over the age of 35.

The over 35 rule only effects retirements. You can place a guy on LTIR regardless of his age and he comes off the cap.

Offcourse Brad the troll could pocket the signing bonus and retire in year 2 of the deal, screwing us one last time.
 
The over 35 rule only effects retirements. You can place a guy on LTIR regardless of his age and he comes off the cap.

Offcourse Brad the troll could pocket the signing bonus and retire in year 2 of the deal, screwing us one last time.
I'm fairly certain we had someone in here a couple of days ago saying that wasn't the case, given he's over 35 when signing the contract.
 
The over 35 rule only effects retirements. You can place a guy on LTIR regardless of his age and he comes off the cap.

Offcourse Brad the troll could pocket the signing bonus and retire in year 2 of the deal, screwing us one last time.

If he retires and takes the cap hit that would be out of character for him. He’s shown he’s a team guy and took a huge discount in Boston

However if he retires does his salary come off the cap if he’s over 35?
 
If he retires and takes the cap hit that would be out of character for him. He’s shown he’s a team guy and took a huge discount in Boston

However if he retires does his salary come off the cap if he’s over 35?

If he retires his cap hit definitely stays on...if he's put on LTIR...now I'm not sure because I'm seeing conflicting info on that.
 
Interesting to see some players we thought highly off got next to nothing for trades
Marchment and Zegras went for nothing

Have a bad feeling we are going to end up with Tanev and Marchand...... Not a fan of either players
 
These signing rumours... Yikes. Brad's about to nuke this team so much faster than I thought, and not for the better.

I mean, is it a lot different than trading a 13th overall pick to move Marleau, signing Mrazek trading back in the draft to fix it and then trading a 2nd for Lyubushkin/to get rid of our Ritchie signing?

Marchment for Malgin?

The biggest thing that Tree has done that wasn't good has been Laughton...I liked him as a winger but not as a 3C solution.

Let's see what actually happens and then judge.
 
Exactly, It shows you how hard it actually is to become good in the NHL, and some fans want to "rebuild again" because they feel like Toronto is entitled to win a championship. You can have good teams and not win, it happens & would suck.

The topic was "we should trade Matthews". Cutting loose a 28-29 year old 1C in his prime. Because they haven't won yet is silly and emotional thinking.

Toronto has good players for another 6-7 years if they are lucky to retain em, As long as they are continuously making the playoffs why would people want to "rebuild" for the unknown.
Spoken like a true President Champion fan, news flash some of the fanbase aren’t satisfied with regular season heroics…….
 
I'd deal Cowan + Danford + 2nd for a promising 2C (maybe not all, but these 3 assets would be on table)

Rossi or Mactavish or Beniers are options to target.

Get the 2C which sets you up for the next decade.

Let's you build your 3C without overpaying Tavares if we want to retain him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger
I'd deal Cowan + Danford + 2nd for a promising 2C (maybe not all, but these 3 assets would be on table)

Rossi or Mactavish or Beniers are options to target.

Get the 2C which sets you up for the next decade.

Let's you build your 3C without overpaying Tavares if we want to retain him
Based off what Zegras got, I don’t think Rossi would cost much more tbh. I would take a chance on him.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad