you went wrong all over the place.
starting at the top
JT is the 'best' C available, and wants to return at a pay cut
Rielly is moveable, but, its up to him
dumps are okay
Knies doesnt deserve 8.5 (yet) ...thats an overpay
patches is retiring, and wasnt very good, save for 1 goal
trade AM, Willy, and Marner - you lost track of the agenda big time, forget the fact that all have NMC!!
Ekblad in no world is worth 10 mil, not even if it were 5 years ago Ekblad
Bennett and Marchand are reasonable and you can fit both with only the Marner walking $$
if McD is available as a UFA next offseason you simply sign him to whatever he asks, and unload whatever it takes to make the cap space. Cap will be going up ~10mil, and we have a bunch coming off the books anyways
with your 'trades', we are a lottery team with no 1st rounders for the next 3 seasons.
- JT is the best C available
via free agency, you mean. Depending what you think of Bennett.
- Everyone seems to agree that Knies is going to get paid in that range. If you want to lock him up for 8 years, that's what it's gonna cost.
- Patches is as strong a bet as you can get to greatly outperform a league minimum salary. If he retires, so be it, but I think he wants one more shot. Not hard to move off him if he and I are wrong.
- I'm not oblivious to the fact that Matthews, Willy and Rielly have NMCs. In theory you can't trade a player with an NMC. In practice, it happens all the time. I've asked on this board before for an example of a player whose team no longer wanted him and he just sat there for multiple seasons refusing to be traded. There is no such player. If we want them gone bad enough we can make it happen.
- Well I hope you're sitting down when you see what Ekblad signs for. He's a former first overall pick who was the #1 defenseman on a president's trophy winning team and three times the #2 on a team that went to the finals three times, winning once (or twice). Remember that 10M next season is like 9M this season. Does 9M sound that bad? He's way better than Rielly in every way. Anyway, no one is ever truly worth what they get on July 1st. This is why you can't build the foundation of a team with free agency, you can only get your finishing pieces, and yes you overpay a little to get the things you need the most before other teams can. You look at his salary compared to the top defensemen in the league and it will look out of whack for sure. But that's what it takes to get the player, and we have the need and we have the room. $10M will be worth it and will get it done. (and hey, if I'm wrong I'm wrong, I'm not saying to just throw $10M at a guy no one else will pay more than $8M, just make him the best offer!)
- There's no reason to believe we would be a lottery team. The team I just envisioned has less in terms of top-end talent at the top of the roster but a much-bolstered bottom and especially middle. It's important to note one more time, that the team being built the way it is now, hasn't worked.
it absolutely works.
teams have won with worse players and teams have won with better players, but, generally, teams dont always go up against the teams that have won the majority of the Stanley Cups every season.
We have had the luck to go against a Cup winner or finalist every season since 2018 and took almost all of them to 7 games.
that is the hump to get over, not blow it up, because we have gone against a Selke finalist/winner and the cup finalist/winner every single season this core has been in the playoffs.
Hmm, ok, so there's still one of you out there, eh. I didn't realize that.
Running it back would be highly ill advised. I'm happy for you that you uncovered some sort of key to success (not facing a selke candidate in the playoffs) and you think this is a profound point but if we are paying 4 forwards spread across two lines $11+M each, then we should be able to expect them to overcome a goddamn selke finalist. Come on!
Either they don't have it individually, or they don't have it in this particular configuration, at these salaries, on this team together. Either way, I've seen enough. Haven't you?
Keep the 2028 1st, if we suck again or fall short, that is the time.
At the conclusion of the 2027 season, that summer all the way through to the summer of 2028 is when maybe the reset occurs.
We cannot reset anything while our 2025, 26 and 27 1st round picks are gone.
It's not a reset, it's a reload. It's an outside of the box solution, selling and then buying.
There's a perfectly logical reason it can make sense, and that is that you can't just unload the cancers from the team to another team that has the kind of things we want back (a change up in top-end forwards). So you act as a middleman who sells for assets, then flips the assets to get other players. It's risky, but fortune favours the bold.
Look at what happens every season - someone makes a big play for an elite player before we even know he's on the market, or they pay less for a great player than we played for a mediocre one. Time to swing big. We can find an Eichel, Rantanen, Stone, Hagel, Jones, etc. They are out there.
I'm in no way advocating falling in the standings without our own first round picks.