LaffyTaffyNYR
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2012
- 17,113
- 2,662
Not ignoring it. But the idea is that one of Lafreniere, Kakko or Kravstov steps up to replace his PP production. Haven't shown it yet, but if one does any we lock in Strome in part because of his powerplay production, it seems wasteful as his opportunity wouldn't be there anymore.So why are we throwing out the fact that Strome can play on the PP, even if he's not an elite PP player? We're just ignoring that to focus on ES points.
As has been said many times, Danault's EV numbers (23 in 53 games) are comparable with Strome's (29 in 56 games). I don't know who Danault was playing with in Montreal, but it wasn't Panarin. And this past year was a down year for Danault. The year before he had 43 EVP in 71 games. Strome had 41 EVP in 70 games.
This year, Strome averaged 3:14 per game on the PP while Danault averaged :19 per game. Their EV ice time was comparable, 14:07 for Strome and 14:15 for Danault.
Danault kills penalties. 2:17 per game, most of any forward on team. Strome averaged :55 per game on the PK, 6th most among forwards.
Danault is much better on faceoffs (52.5%) than Strome (43.2%).
Danault will cost a similar amount to what Strome will cost on his next contract. He is also free to acquire as a free agent, while we can trade Strome for assets.
So why are we throwing out the fact that Strome can play on the PP, even if he's not an elite PP player? We're just ignoring that to focus on ES points.
Danault had almost 19 minutes toi in rhe playoffs, led all forwards on his team, and scored 4 points. 2021 Eric Staal had twice as many.
In the regular season his 5v5 production is fine, in the playoffs he’s absolutely a defensive specialist and you better be comfortable paying him for that
This is significantly better than the Goodrow dealColeman to Calgary, 6 years, 4.9mm
Leslie saying that Hamilton is going to NJ for 7 years, 60+