Amazon is gearing up to be a major player in the next NHL rights contest. I wonder if part of the reason Bell sold their MLSE stake was to be able to have a bigger warchest for NHL rights. Although maybe they feel like they dodged a bullet not trying to outbid Rogers the last go around.
Yea, I wouldn’t be surprised if this similar package will become a dual US/CAN deal. It could be a unique type of deal that benefits all fans in North America and Amazon has the money do it.
So the precedent is the Apple / MLS deal, where Apple was given WORLDWIDE streaming rights to MLS games. So it's certainly possible.
It's a little bit different in that MLS is really a secondary soccer league (even with a few top stars), while that hockey might be a secondary sport, but NHL is the top hockey league in the world. NHL makes money selling hockey rights not only in Canada / US, but also in various other markets as well.
Problem is all those rights expire at different times.
No, it’s on TSN , like all NFL games in Canada. Also CTV has games, but CTV owns part of TSN I think.Do Canadian Prime subscribers also get NFL Thursday night games?
Certainly true, but much like the new NBA media deal, the NHL gonna need a 3rd package to get at least 2x more in their next US media deal and Amazon with this deal has the early leg up to do it. How they can structure it around the next US and CAN deal I’m not sure, but I’m sure from a financial standpoint, but makes sense to have Amazon involved.
No, it’s on TSN , like all NFL games in Canada. Also CTV has games, but CTV owns part of TSN I think.
Thanks, I’m aware, it was more just listing the channels, as Bell isn’t a channel, but good to point out Bell as well.CTV and TSN are both owned by Bell.
MLS had instructed teams years before to ensure none of their local deals exceeded a specific year when they planned to go this route. I am sure they also ensured international deals also expired around the same time.So the precedent is the Apple / MLS deal, where Apple was given WORLDWIDE streaming rights to MLS games. So it's certainly possible.
It's a little bit different in that MLS is really a secondary soccer league (even with a few top stars), while that hockey might be a secondary sport, but NHL is the top hockey league in the world. NHL makes money selling hockey rights not only in Canada / US, but also in various other markets as well.
Problem is all those rights expire at different times.
If Rodgers couldn't make it work at that price point per game. i am not sure how splitting it to a higher price per game would make it financially viable.Certainly true, but much like the new NBA media deal, the NHL gonna need a 3rd package to get at least 2x more in their next US media deal and Amazon with this deal has the early leg up to do it. How they can structure it around the next US and CAN deal I’m not sure, but I’m sure from a financial standpoint, but makes sense to have Amazon involved.
i'm pretty sure that the statement was made in response to your comment about thinking that CTV owned part of TSN by basically saying that they are sister networks both owned by Bell.Thanks, I’m aware, it was more just listing the channels, as Bell isn’t a channel, but good to point out Bell as well.
Well if you want to be technically accurate, which I wasn’t trying to be, other than listing channels, the games were on.i'm pretty sure that the statement was made in response to your comment about thinking that CTV owned part of TSN by basically saying that they are sister networks both owned by Bell.
The Thursday Night Football package also airs on CTV2, which, of course, is also owned by Bell.
Fair enough.Well if you want to be technically accurate, which I wasn’t trying to be, other than listing channels, the games were on.
TSN is owned by Bell and ESPN (which has its own parent companies above it).
If the new Canadian media deal is a split between Amazon and/or Rogers, and Bell, then Amazon would have paid a pretty penny to do so. Amazon is paying for the right to broadcast the most valuable sport in the country. They aren’t concerned about the financials and probably better for Rogers not to pay as much for the whole pie anyway.If Rodgers couldn't make it work at that price point per game. i am not sure how splitting it to a higher price per game would make it financially viable.