NYR Viper
Registered User
I highly doubt that happens. Although after next season when almost the entire team is UFA, that may be a different story.
Malkin, Kovy, Ovie- You guys are more than welcome to stay in Russia.
And in that order.
What is the NHL going to do, extradite him from Russia and force him? If the KHL wants to breach their agreement with the NHL, I am not sure that there is much that the NHL can do about it. I am not a lawyer and not sure of what can and cannot happen, but the KHL is a professional league on a different continent. If Russian born players think that they can get paid more, why wouldn't the KHL try to keep them?I wouldn't think he can, as he has a current NHL contract.
Bill Day remains confident that Kovy and KHL will honor deals. "We have no reason to believe the KHL will let them play". More Daly...
Continued Daly on Kovy and KHL..."It would be inconcsistent with our agreement with them."
Genadi Boguslavski (twitter) @GenadiB (Retweeted by TSNBobMcKenzie)
And I think the new CBA says that no matter where they play if the salary is over a certain amount it counts against the cap. That will ruin the Devils if he does not come back.
edit:
Bob McKenzie (Twitter) @TSNBobMcKenzie
Yikes. I dislike the Devils as much as the next guy but noone wants that. That could destroy the franchise.
After a lockout that did NOTHING for the league as far as popularity, diluting the league of talent and charismatic players is ALWAYS a good idea.
It is business. Nothing else. Isn't that they the owners tried NOT to honor the contracts that they signed? Save your vehemence for both sides, please.
And why should the KHL help the NHL out? They also have a business to run. What is the NHL going to do about it? Nothing. There is nothing that they can do.
So are the players voting on the CBA today?
Call it as you wish, BRF. Just seeing it from my point of view. The owners used an option and decided to get out from under having to pay contracts (albeit subject to the CBA). Any Russian player, playing for a different league, on a different continent can. He and any Russian player can utlize whatever is fair in businesss for themselves. He needs never playin the NHL again. That would make his contract void. The owners choose to make a grab for money. The Russian players can do the same. In the end, IF (HUGE IF) this happens, the owners reap what they sow.The two situations are NOT the same.
Andy Strickland @andystrickland
Surprised how few #NHL Owners apologized to their fans
If the KHL wasn't willing to enforce the agreement (which it appears they are), the only other avenue would be to go through the IIHF, and I'm pretty sure all they can do is ban him from international play.What is the NHL going to do, extradite him from Russia and force him? If the KHL wants to breach their agreement with the NHL, I am not sure that there is much that the NHL can do about it. I am not a lawyer and not sure of what can and cannot happen, but the KHL is a professional league on a different continent. If Russian born players think that they can get paid more, why wouldn't the KHL try to keep them?
If teams loose their Russian stars to a different league, then it is a case of the owners reaping what they sow.
Becuase they do not care. To them, the fans are sheep who will flock and fill their coffers.Andy Strickland @andystrickland
Surprised how few #NHL Owners apologized to their fans[/B]
My point is that the KHL is not going to enforce. I am just saying that the NHL would be SOL on this.If the KHL wasn't willing to enforce the agreement (which it appears they are), the only other avenue would be to go through the IIHF, and I'm pretty sure all they can do is ban him from international play.
They would be, yes. Though I'm sure it would be tough for Kovalchuk to sit and watch the Sochi Olympics. Anyways, the KHL has indicated they will honor the agreement (link).My point is that the KHL is not going to enforce. I am just saying that the NHL would be SOL on this.
Becuase they do not care. To them, the fans are sheep who will flock and fill their coffers.
And idiots like Melrose, only further their cause. When he was on air, it was "we have the hungriest, greatest fans in the world. Off course they will come back. They always have before. And the game will be better than ever."
I think that this time, the owners feel a sting.
“It’s pretty clear how Gary’s operated here,’’ said the agent, referring to Gary Bettman, league commissioner for all three lockouts in the game’s history. “If you look at the document, you can tell he’s ignored the input of hockey people, especially his own GMs, who are the guys who have to work with it every day. Nothing changed in no-trades, in arb, in age threshold for free agency . . . guaranteed contracts.
“He’s an extremely bright guy, no one questions that. But I think he thinks his own GMs are dumb. He refuses to listen to most of them, and so you end up with a deal that wins on 50/50 and contract length — very important stuff —but then all this other vital stuff gets left alone.’’
“I get the 50/50 — that’s where the other leagues went, so you had to figure that’s what would happen here. And, yeah, that’s a huge change. But some of what didn’t get touched here, like, say, the age level for free agency, kinda shocks me. It stayed the same. So the players can’t call that a win, per se, but there’s value in the fact that a lot of it didn’t change.’’
“Not everyone is happy,’’ said a league source. “There will be guys in there not happy about the revenue sharing, others who think the cap is too high to start, that it takes too long to get to 50/50. Some are angry over the fact that there are compliance buyouts. I think there will be many angry objections, but I also think it will pass. It’s done . . . we’re moving on.’’
If you're looking to get pumped up go to NHL.com and watch highlights of last year's playoff games.
Dunno about you guys but I'm ready to go.
So, so ready.
And this board is hilarious--in two days, I've seen about 20 posters that I haven't seen for months.