bubba5
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 2,356
- 113
That would be sweet. No Kovie and no Ovi I mean.
He was just on tsn radio saying ovy is on the way back but others are still up in the air. Also he said most likely 48 games.
That would be sweet. No Kovie and no Ovi I mean.
In a presentation made by league executives to both the owners and players on the eve of the lockout, a plan was laid out that explained how the league hoped to add $300 million in new revenues over the next three years. Initiatives like a stadium series of outdoor games would blend returns to traditional hockey markets such as Chicago and Boston while expanding outdoor opportunities to other markets, perhaps coinciding with a national hockey moment like Hockey Weekend Across America. Revenues were expected to grow thanks to international events like a revamped World Cup of Hockey schedule, European markets, digital media and so on.
The message last summer was crystal clear: Things are pretty good, so don't screw it up.
Shortly after that presentation, the league responded by locking out its players for the third time in commissioner Gary Bettman's tenure.
Sponsors and partners, such as NBC Sports, were in fact told by league officials, including Bettman, that this negotiation would be a "tweak and a fix."
McDonald's (in the United States) was supposed to be a key NHL sponsor with an ad campaign tied to the Winter Classic, All-Star Game and other high-profile events, but it moved on and signed a two-year deal with the NFL after the lockout started.
The lockout also has the potential to set the game back in terms of deals with cable providers and where the NHL Network is carried on their services (if it's carried at all).
What makes this lockout even more mind-boggling is that in the presentation made to the players and to the NHL's owners before the lockout, they were shown the strides the league had taken in a range of areas, including recognition and relevance among sports fans.
Agreed. I also think that Bettman sold some owners a bill of goods that stated that the lockout will not last very long. That is why he told the sponsors that all was needed was a "tweak and a fix". Neither he nor the owners expected the response that they got from the players. And greatly underestimated them.That really shows how poorly run the NHL is.
I just can't stop coming back to that fact. No matter what blame the players share during the negotiations of the lockout, the bottom line is that the league has been mismanaged for a very long time and that falls on the owners and Bettman.
I'm vaguely annoyed at how long it will take for games to get started. After all this lockout crap, another 2 weeks is killing me
Rupp wearing #17 now
Stralman listed as #6 on NYR website...
Halpern - 15. Pyatt - 14. Asham - 45 (probably for the # of games he'll be suspended this season)
Will there be a training camp this week?
Should we start expecting practice updates and such in the next few days.
Agreed, I'm glued to this site right now, can't wait much longer.
Wow - hearing ratification process and legal work on CBA may take a while. Could even be five or six more days.
Will there be a training camp this week?
Should we start expecting practice updates and such in the next few days.
Agreed, I'm glued to this site right now, can't wait much longer.
I am okay if Asham is suspended for some games this season. The point of that signing was to add grit to the line-up. Of course I don't condone super dirty play, but I would rather this team be the aggressor than the opposite.
I still like the Pyatt signing a lot
Maybe Thursday, could be as late as Saturday.
But there was already an existing CBA, no?
So now that there is an agreement in principal, can't the owners just lift the lockout so everyone can start practicing until the new deal is ratified?
So, this **** could still backfire? As in the lockout could still happen? Nothing seems done, really?