swiftwin
★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
- Jul 26, 2005
- 24,182
- 13,889
His lungs are f***ed.
Can you chill with the alarmism? His lungs are not f***ed.
His lungs are f***ed.
It is strange that it was reported as asymptomatic when he first tested, but he's obviously having some issues now a month later.
I had pneumonia a couple of years back and it was about 6 months before i felt i was 90% recovered. Never got back to 100%. Although, physically, i am perhaps a slight tier below an elite young athlete.
Same here. I had a really nasty bronchitis in 2014 when I went to Cuba. For about a year after that, I would often go into coughing fits whenever I was playing sports. Over the years, things have gotten much better. But I still go into coughing fits whenever I go to a wavepool, because the chlorine just irritates the shit out of my lungs. But my cardio is probably better than it's even been because I started bike commuting to work every single day from 2015, up until March of this year when work from home was implemented.
People get scar tissue and all sorts of ailments from random viruses and diseases. COVID is not unique in this.
It is strange that it was reported as asymptomatic when he first tested, but he's obviously having some issues now a month later.
I had pneumonia a couple of years back and it was about 6 months before i felt i was 90% recovered. Never got back to 100%. Although, physically, i am perhaps a slight tier below an elite young athlete.
Even asymptomatic people can have long lasting effects... unfortunately no one is "safe". Many will regret thinking they were.
I think the whole long lasting effects thing is overblown. I'm sure an extreme minority might have severe complications, but as with anything that attacks the lungs (bronchitis, pneumonia), there's always going to be some lingering effects for a while (scar tissue, etc).
I'm not trying to minimize the seriousness of COVID. It's extremely serious and dangerous to the elderly and those with weakened immune systems. I'm just pumping the brakes on those trying to imply that there's a massive looming long term public health crisis for those that had mild symptoms. There's very little to indicate that's going to be the case.
Is there a lot of data on lasting effects on asymptomatic? Seems a bit early to know that.Even asymptomatic people can have long lasting effects... unfortunately no one is "safe". Many will regret thinking they were.
The issue is that the “symptoms” are respiratory.Is there a lot of data on lasting effects on asymptomatic? Seems a bit early to know that.
Is there a lot of data on lasting effects on asymptomatic? Seems a bit early to know that.
The issue is that the “symptoms” are respiratory.
So Asymptomatic is deemed no fever no cough no trouble breath etc etc.
They are finding more and more this virus seems vascular. Not respiratory. So whether “asymptomatic” still leads to inflammation of various blood vessels, I’m not sure.
that’s my main question about the vaccine. It kills symptoms. But does that I include the underlying symptoms affecting blood vessels.
I have no idea
Everything I’ve read has not said that. It significantly reduces symptoms. To which they are basically not even there. It hasn’t shown to reduce transmission. Or maybe they just don’t have enough data for that as it was quick trials.It doesn't kill symptoms. It kills the virus.
edit: Or, more specifically, it trains your immune system to detect and kill the virus before it does any damage.
Everything I’ve read has not said that. It significantly reduces symptoms. To which they are basically not even there. It hasn’t shown to reduce transmission. Or maybe they just don’t have enough data for that as it was quick trials.
He’s not wrong. It is not yet known if the vaccine stops transmission. There is no data on it yet.Uhhhh, where exactly have you been reading this?
Pretty much every release since it was announced Pfizer and moderna have been close to a vaccine.Uhhhh, where exactly have you been reading this?
It is strange that it was reported as asymptomatic when he first tested, but he's obviously having some issues now a month later.
I had pneumonia a couple of years back and it was about 6 months before i felt i was 90% recovered. Never got back to 100%. Although, physically, i am perhaps a slight tier below an elite young athlete.
It doesn't kill symptoms. It kills the virus.
edit: Or, more specifically, it trains your immune system to detect and kill the virus before it does any damage.
Herd immunity is still achievable.Every other vaccine/inoculation works this way. You get the virus, your body kills it. You technically did have the virus but I don't think you'd ever build up the viral load needed to be infectious. It gets destroyed before you reach that level of infection.
If, indeed, those with the vaccine are still infectious than the whole herd immunity thing doesn't work. We will need to vaccinate much more than the 70% or so that usual makes for herd immunity. Don't know actual numbers but with a virus THIS infectious I would say well in excess of 95% would need to be vaccinated to have herd immunity.
Herd immunity is still achievable.
if this significantly reduces symptoms. Less people die from the virus. More people have it, successfully fight it > become immune to getting it again. It doesn’t bounce around as much
Every other vaccine/inoculation works this way. You get the virus, your body kills it. You technically did have the virus but I don't think you'd ever build up the viral load needed to be infectious. It gets destroyed before you reach that level of infection.
If, indeed, those with the vaccine are still infectious than the whole herd immunity thing doesn't work. We will need to vaccinate much more than the 70% or so that usual makes for herd immunity. Don't know actual numbers but with a virus THIS infectious I would say well in excess of 95% would need to be vaccinated to have herd immunity.
This of course assumes that having had the virus makes you immune, except there is evidence of re-infection.