Rempe penalty for being Rempe

[Profet]

Didn't see a thread on this one... but Rempe took a penalty yesterday for... I'm not sure what?



The puck was there, his elbows were down, the hit wasn't to the the numbers... no idea.

Click to read more...

 

[a mangy Meowth]

Sure looks like boarding to me. Do you know the definition of boarding? Sounds like you might not

 

[qc14]

It's a board. Pretty straightforward!

Not even going to go in on Rempe for it. It's a minor penalty, nothing more. Very clearly a penalty though and I think you're being purposefully obtuse claiming otherwise

 

[rockymtnoyster]

Goons gonna be goons

 

[Profet]

Sure looks like boarding to me. Do you know the definition of boarding? Sounds like you might not

What if I told you the penalty wasn't for boarding?

 

[a mangy Meowth]

What if I told you the penalty wasn't for boarding?

What does it matter? The play was illegal. What was it, interference? I could see that too

 

[Fatass]

Awkward player who makes awkward plays. He will continue to cause injury to other players, and himself, by being so awkward.

 

[Do Make Say Think]

When you are a known dbag, you don't get the benefit of the doubt.

 

[tarheelhockey]

What does it matter? The play was illegal. What was it, interference? I could see that too

Looks like it was indeed interference.

This is the second active thread where people don’t seem to understand you can’t body check a guy who doesn’t have the puck.

 

[Shocker]

The call was for interference and judging by that clip, it does seem that the Penguins player doesn't even touch the puck, so a correct call?

 

[ijuka]

Didn't see a thread on this one... but Rempe took a penalty yesterday for... I'm not sure what?



The puck was there, his elbows were down, the hit wasn't to the the numbers... no idea.

It's called boarding. "The puck was there", "His elbows were down", "The hit wasn't to the numbers" ... None of these have anything to do with boarding.

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

He didn't touch the puck, so it was interference, but had he touched the puck i don't see that as a penalty.

Someone on X crying about something that's legitimate. Colour me shocked.

 

[a mangy Meowth]

Looks like it was indeed interference.

This is the second active thread where people don’t seem to understand you can’t body check a guy who doesn’t have the puck.

I can already see it: "but it was kinda in the general vicinity for like 0.05 seconds"

 

[robertmac43]

That is a boarding penalty for sure.

 

[Sasha Orlov]

Didn’t have the puck and hit from behind

Really dumb thread

 

[Rodgerwilco]

He smashed a guy's head into the glass who didn't have the puck and you're whining about this call?

Please take off the homer glasses, maybe stick to being a lurker........

Awkward player who makes awkward plays. He will continue to cause injury to other players, and himself, by being so awkward.

He's not an "awkward player who makes awkward plays". He's a goon who continues to attempt to injury his opponents. Benefit of the doubt is looooooong gone for this guy.

 

[Magic Mittens]

Call it boarding or inference, either way its a penalty