iamjs
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2008
- 12,575
- 941
wasn't this in reference to him insisting that Sid or Geno will be traded?
He's a clown and should be treated as such.
A lesson on personal attacks from someone who exists only to bash a hockey player on the internet.Isn't this whole thread a personal attack? There aren't moderators on this the board there are narrative drivers based upon their own opinion. So we have editors not moderators. And that's bad if you disagree with their opinions.
It isn't right.
A lesson on personal attacks from someone who exists only to bash a hockey player on the internet.
Athletic subscribers have more invested therefore they are more important and intelligent.It's ok to criticize Rossi ... if you're a season ticket subscriber to The Athletic.
Rossi is a semi-public figure at the very least. His actions and his work are fair game for criticism. If he doesn’t like it, he can find another line of work. Is that simple enough for you?Isn't this whole thread a personal attack? There aren't moderators on this the board there are narrative drivers based upon their own opinion. So we have editors not moderators. And that's bad if you disagree with their opinions.
It isn't right.
A lesson on personal attacks from someone who exists only to bash a hockey player on the internet.
Rossi is a semi-public figure at the very least. His actions and his work are fair game for criticism. If he doesn’t like it, he can find another line of work. Is that simple enough for you?
Probably has something to do with the entire premise of your thread just being another one of your thinly-veiled bash Geno fests? Which is fine. But you already do that with almost every post you make anyway…so what’s the point of making a thread to do it?Ok fair enough. Explain to me why a thread questioning the power play is not worthy for hockey discussion when this hockey adjacent, worthless thread is worthy?
Explain to me how the puppet strings are being pulled here?
Probably has something to do with the entire premise of your thread just being another one of your thinly-veiled bash Geno fests? Which is fine. But you already do that with almost every post you make anyway…so what’s the point of making a thread to do it?
My unsolicited advice to you would be to change up your shtick every now and then. Or go ahead and make your own website.
He's not anyone's kind of guy.Rob Rossi is not my kinda guy.
He's on ignore and I can already tell it's the same old bs with him.Probably has something to do with the entire premise of your thread just being another one of your thinly-veiled bash Geno fests? Which is fine. But you already do that with almost every post you make anyway…so what’s the point of making a thread to do it?
My unsolicited advice to you would be to change up your shtick every now and then. Or go ahead and make your own website.
Why not ask the people in charge of the board? Send them a DM and ask for clarification on the rules. That is how most message boards want these things handled, not by infesting threads with it.Ok fair enough. Explain to me why a thread questioning the power play is not worthy for hockey discussion when this hockey adjacent, worthless thread is worthy?
Explain to me how the puppet strings are being pulled here?
When we can pry his hockey stick from his cold dead hand.But we're controlling a narrative that #71 is still elite. We've lost so many series....at what point do we question the superstars?
Probably has something to do with the entire premise of your thread just being another one of your thinly-veiled bash Geno fests? Which is fine. But you already do that with almost every post you make anyway…so what’s the point of making a thread to do it?
My unsolicited advice to you would be to change up your shtick every now and then. Or go ahead and make your own website.
He’s going to get paid 6 million and change for the next few seasons. So he’s definitely not getting paid like he’s still an “elite” player. So I fail to see the argument.If the power play worked then there would be no need for a thread of criticism.
If a superstar doesn't want to be questioned then his fans should expect better production.
But we're controlling a narrative that #71 is still elite. We've lost so many series....at what point do we question the superstars?
You bash and question Geno’s production all the time though?But you can't "bash" or even question the production of the highest player, most favorited player on the team. That needs moderated.
I am an Athletic subscriber and I am quite proud of both my insignificance and my lack of intelligence. It jibes well with my Kraken STs. I still like Yohe, fwiw, some folks in here are basically negative hard asses if not just plain mean. Hell, I'm not expecting Reilly, Feinstein or certainly not the next coming of David Foster Wallace.Athletic subscribers have more invested therefore they are more important and intelligent.
sir, this is a Wendy'sIf the power play worked then there would be no need for a thread of criticism.
If a superstar doesn't want to be questioned then his fans should expect better production.
But we're controlling a narrative that #71 is still elite. We've lost so many series....at what point do we question the superstars?