Sounds like a good time, but I'm just way more interested in how obscure I can get off of memory... But, I do have a fun idea that I'm waiting for that will certainly jack up my uniqueness score, it just requires a couple of key teams in combination, and no funky third columns like goalies stats, high numbers of points, played for one/two/three teams, etc... Hopefully soon!Have any of you tried getting the higest score? Might be a fun little experiment for a couple days
Well depends who you’re competing against but the way me and my friends and I guess most people do it is that it has to be 100% from memory. It’s part of the fun that you might feel like player X could fit into that slot but you have to weigh the risk of missing it instead of going for the safe but high uniqueness option. I have no idea how people here get such low uniquenesses, I have memorized some the teams of a few pretty unique players but there’s no way I would be able to remember so many that I would be able to pull off a full grid of sub 1.0% players.Played for the first time today and Its way harder than it appear. What the concensus, are we suppose to do "research" or its fair play to only do from memory?
There no way am doing sub 1% from memory consistently. I got two but also a lot of my shot where radko gudas into shattered plexi.
I was trying to be a smartass plugging kassian for montreal and apparently I didn't read the rules correctly.
Well depends who you’re competing against but the way me and my friends and I guess most people do it is that it has to be 100% from memory. It’s part of the fun that you might feel like player X could fit into that slot but you have to weigh the risk of missing it instead of going for the safe but high uniqueness option. I have no idea how people here get such low uniquenesses, I have memorized some the teams of a few pretty unique players but there’s no way I would be able to remember so many that I would be able to pull off a full grid of sub 1.0% players.