Player Discussion Rem Pitlick - The New Byron Edition

MasterD

Giggidy Giggidy Goo
Jul 1, 2004
5,948
5,415
He played at a 46pts/season pace last year, both in Minnesota and Montreal. On a last place team. For cheap. I'd sign him around 1.5M/2M$ easily. Heck I take him before a bunch of guys on this team including Byron, Armia, Hoffman... Hugues just needs to move someone to make some room on the cap and contract number.
 

Natey

GOATS
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
62,829
9,372
He produced at roughly the same PPG pace with the Wild as he did with us and they waived him. You don't overpay a guy you picked on waivers and played with you for a half season.

FWIW I'm sure its a negotiation tactic and Pitlick will be back with a reasonable contract. He won't have the same opportunity on other teams as he will have here.
Sure, but the Wild was also a small sample size. It was part of a season. He came here and posted very good numbers for the rest of the season.

I wouldn't be overpaying him for years, but I have a hard time believing you couldn't get a 5th for him.
 

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,247
11,781
The problem is that Habs have an abundance of signed wingers to deal with: Hoffman, Dadonov, Drouin, Anderson, Caufield, Gally, Armia, Byron.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrom and lamp9post

dcyhabs

Registered User
May 30, 2008
4,456
2,678
Montreal
The problem is that Habs have an abundance of signed wingers to deal with: Hoffman, Dadonov, Drouin, Anderson, Caufield, Gally, Armia, Byron.
And they want to keep who? Caufield and maybe Anderson? Possbily Armia? Pitlick doesn't have much value but at least they don't need to jettison him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: angusyoung

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,247
11,781
And they want to keep who? Caufield and maybe Anderson? Possbily Armia? Pitlick doesn't have much value but at least they don't need to jettison him.
They have to keep Gally. Untradable with his actual contract.
 

BaseballCoach

Registered User
Dec 15, 2006
21,252
9,583
Basically trying to avoid overpaying or having another Byron contract.
The QO is only for one year, and the club simply cannot be forced into a Byron style 4 year deal, never mind that Byron was 30 when it started and not 25.

If Rem chooses arbitration, we can pick one year, and if the award is over $4.5M, we can still walk from it.

So the reason to not qualify Rem Pitlick would be if it is too plausible that an arbitrator would peg his value at something more than we would be comfortable with, example $3M.

Perhaps the best route is simply to offer him a 2 or 3 year deal at a salary the club is happy with and not risk arbitration. Perhaps at a bit more than Evans got. The it would come down to whether Rem is comfortable in the Habs organizaiton that is the first to give him a real chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Barron de HF

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,362
25,753
The problem is that Habs have an abundance of signed wingers to deal with: Hoffman, Dadonov, Drouin, Anderson, Caufield, Gally, Armia, Byron.

And now with Dach, one of Evan's, Poehling, or Dach should be on the wing and in the lineup every night.

Really gotta move out at least 2 vets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blarneylad

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,247
11,781
And now with Dach, one of Evan's, Poehling, or Dach should be on the wing and in the lineup every night.

Really gotta move out at least 2 vets.
I guess Poehling would have to play LW or be the #13 forward.
 

Hannibal

Fear the Weber
Feb 11, 2007
11,153
8,737
Renaud Lavoie said that if he’s not sign past monday, he doesn’t expect him to be back… so we’ll see.
 

Pompeius Magnus

Registered User
May 18, 2014
21,171
19,083
Kanata ,ON
I would sure hate to just lose him :confused: He fits really well in our mix and he's still young enough to be around for a while . I hope he'll be willing to do business on this.
 

JoelWarlord

Registered User
May 7, 2012
6,451
10,187
Halifax
I hope he comes back but I think it's correct to not qualify him if you can't make a deal. Don't really want to go to arbitration with him.
 

the

Registered User
Mar 2, 2012
14,124
19,783
Montreal
One of the few rare players we had that was fun to watch. What a shame if we lose him, he’s more valuable than most players we had in our roster last season.
 

BaseballCoach

Registered User
Dec 15, 2006
21,252
9,583
I hope he comes back but I think it's correct to not qualify him if you can't make a deal. Don't really want to go to arbitration with him.
Unless Pitlick signs cheap for 3 years similar to Evans contract, we can only keep him if we shed another contract, and the decision on qualifying him has to be made ny tomorrow. Any arbitration award under $4.5M we would be stuck with, unable to walk away. And if we qualify him, we can do mothing to stop himfrom going to arbitration.

Even though I like Rem, we can more easily afford to lose him than to give away an Anderson, Petry or Dvorak in order to keep him.
 

Le Barron de HF

Justin make me proud
Mar 12, 2008
16,702
4,749
Shawinigan
Don't see the point of not QOing him. Unless I'm mistaken even if his arbitration case awards him a big salary, we can simply walk away no?
 

beowulf

Not a nice guy.
Jan 29, 2005
59,652
9,186
Ottawa
The problem is that Habs have an abundance of signed wingers to deal with: Hoffman, Dadonov, Drouin, Anderson, Caufield, Gally, Armia, Byron.
And comparing his play last year to most of those guys, I'd take Pitlick especially over drouin and Anderson
 

Ad

Ad

Ad