Unfriendly Ghost
Kasper
I think this is a good deal. If he plays well, you keep him. But if he sucks, you can bury him and it doesn't really hurt you at all. And he can go lead the kids in GR.
5.5, 5, 5, 4.75, 3.5, 3, 3.
Not 100% sure Abby will play out the entirety of that deal. Those last two years look like a bit of cap hit massage.
Then trade him Arizona or whoever is in financial problems.
It was that easy with Dastyuk, it was easy with Bickell.
People just just stop freaking out these things. Abdelakder is a great player and lets enjoy about his prime years now. Worry those late years later. Cap will go up, relative caphit will go down and so on.
Same whining every year about different contracts.
It was easy with Bickell?
They had to give up Teravainen who is a hell of a player.
We had to give up a pretty good draft position with Datsyuk.
This stuff has a cost.
no one on the team has a NMC.
Yeah I mean I am not thrilled about the Abs K either but at the end of the day he would probably have gotten at least something similar elsewhere if it came down to it. He brings some sandpaper to a soft roster and though his cap hit is a little high he is hardly the biggest contract concern that I have with this team.
The Kronner and Zetterberg contracts are pretty rough too, but it is understandable considering that it wasn't long ago that they were both impact players. Impact players demand term and $$ so it is not too surprising that they got longer deals than they should have and we are in the situation we are now where they kind of suck and they still getting paid pretty significant dollars.
The Ericcson and Howard contracts are the ones I really don't like. Howard isn't moving like ever at that cap hit and we can only hope that someone in Vegas is a Jimmy Howard fan lol. Ericcson was never good, and definitely should not have been paid like he was a top four. That is one I just do not get. Our history with big, slow, soft defensemen is truly pitiful.
Uwe Krupp, Dmitri Bykov, Maxim Kuznetsov, Andreas Lilja... and Jonathan Ericcson.... its like the same #@$*!$#( player over and over again lol. And please add some to the list that I have left out... I know there is more!
I don't think it's exactly fair to spend two or three years (accurately) pointing out how much Z has declined as so many of us have and then to use how much coattailing Z provides to players on his line. I don't think Z has done anything for Abdelkader the past two years beyond being a mediocre top line linemate.
<snip>I think it's accurate to call him someone who doesn't create, but I'm not certain that's something which should be a de facto insult. He's a thick net front guy that scores shotgun-range goals, hits, and fights a little. On a team who has not another single player who can do that and without him would get criticized for not having anyone who could do that, those traits have value.
Then trade him Arizona or whoever is in financial problems.
It was that easy with Dastyuk, it was easy with Bickell.
I don't mean you but others... people just just stop freaking out these things. Abdelakder is a great player and lets enjoy about his prime years now. Worry those late years later. Cap will go up, relative caphit will go down and so on.
Same whining every year about different contracts. Now Miller is the wrong bench veteran who is tutoring kids.
Few hears ago it was Franzen and now it isn't any kind of problem to us. LTIR-non-factor.
Henkka, do you honestly believe Abdelkader is a great player?
What has he done that's great?
Henkka, do you honestly believe Abdelkader is a great player?
What has he done that's great?
If corner battles, physicality and effective netfront presence aren't anything great, then I can't help you.
Maybe we should just fill the roster with twelve Jiri Hudlers and enjoy.
Oh I forgot, great player RELATIVE TO HIS CAPHIT.
Relatively great. Not 10 million player great.
And movable contract, because last years are with cheaper salary/higher caphit. There will be takers, if it becomes a problem. It's not a concern now.
The best argument you'll get is he's unique to the Wings in his willingness to muck it up around the net. While I generally agree, 7 years remains insane. Most of us wanted something like 4x4.
The best argument you'll get is he's unique to the Wings in his willingness to muck it up around the net. While I generally agree, 7 years remains insane. Most of us wanted something like 4x4.
I honestly think on this team Abdelkader had leverage for 4.75-5.25 Million per year. Maybe even 5.5. I know you all say "BS he did", well I think our team of perimeter tiny forwards DID infact need Him or "someone like him" and 5M was going to be the cost PER YEAR.
I think 7 years was dumb. No one thinks 7 years was good. There is no one saying 7 years was good.
Holland's mistake here is thinking 7 years doesnt matter as much as 5.25 vs 4.25 Cap hit. I think he did the same with Ericsson.
These are great for CAP #'s now. But extremely risky vs time.
I think we are all upset about the future risks. But this is a great deal for the next 3-4 years. And its a horrible deal for the last 3 most likely.
Bottom line is we did need Abdelkader's style of play. (Drafting Bertuzzi, Smith.. and trading for Sadowy i think is evidence that Detroit was over a barrel with Abby, and they don't want that to happen again.)
(We are drafting larger guys, Larkin, Mantha, Svechnikov). To try and fix these problems.
I think continuing to complain about the contract is a waste of time. Because no one is arguing it is "good"... its livable for now. Ericsson got injured and sucks now... so that looks like a total train wreck. Also makes Abby's risk seem higher.
Whatever, lets move on. We have much more important things to worry about. We can always expose Abby to the Expansion draft if we want him gone that badly. (but we wont).
Henkka, do you honestly believe Abdelkader is a great player?
What has he done that's great?
This is all very fair. I'm not in any disagreement. The cap hits Holland has signed have always been in line with league averages and generally good to fair, but as you point out, length seems to kill them. Ericsson and Howard are great examples. The start of their deals were right in line with what you'd expect, but as their usefulness has declined, these final years, even if the cap hit isn't terrible, ends up feeling like a total waste.
To bring this full circle, Holland is painfully loyal. And Miller coming back fits into that narrative. Fortunately Miller's deal is inconsequential, but it's also just another in a string of signings that shows once Holland finds a guy he likes, he's going to keep him around long as possible.
This is all very fair. I'm not in any disagreement. The cap hits Holland has signed have always been in line with league averages and generally good to fair, but as you point out, length seems to kill them. Ericsson and Howard are great examples. The start of their deals were right in line with what you'd expect, but as their usefulness has declined, these final years, even if the cap hit isn't terrible, ends up feeling like a total waste.
To bring this full circle, Holland is painfully loyal. And Miller coming back fits into that narrative. Fortunately Miller's deal is inconsequential, but it's also just another in a string of signings that shows once Holland finds a guy he likes, he's going to keep him around long as possible.
He is a good hockey player, that actually is still improving to this point. What leads you to think he is a player of some significance... Well how about Lombardi and his brain trust immediately identifying him as a guy they want for Team USA, along with his other hockey brain trust involved there. Abdelkader is certainly not getting anything beyond the market and yes in free agency I think he would have been sought after. For instance who do you think is more valuable today and for several seasons moving forward Abdelkader or Brouwer. Brouwer has three 20 goal seasons with a career high of 43 points. Abdelkader actually plays a heavier game than him, is slightly younger and is still actually trending up as a hockey player. Laad who is no doubt better wants well over 6 million per and a rumored seven years.
The Abdelkader contract might be troubling on the back-end, it might not, hey maybe he is fine for the duration having played substantially less games as a younger guy than some of his counterparts. We shall see, but his contract isn't out of line today and his ability to demand terms would have been met by somebody on the open market more than likely. Abdelkader is an attractive asset to hockey types, its why his phone rings off the hook when Team USA can call him and why it is pretty noticeable when he is hurt in terms of how are team plays since he took big steps forward in his game.
As for the real topic at hand. I hate the Miller signing, but oh well Drew Miller is a hard worker and a good team player, I wish him the best but was really hoping we would move on from him.
I actually don't mind the Howard deal. He played well before he got it, and we could never have expected Mrazek to do so well at that time. 5 yrs deal, and 5 Mil i thought was fine.
But lets talk about what this thread is supposed to be about.
Miller, hes signed so cheaply it does exactly what Holland loves, provides depth at virtually no real salary risk. If someone on our AHL team wants Miller's job, they are not going to get it by default. He will have to come here and kick ass. Some of you will say "holland, veterans.... cheese" etc etc.
Lets be honest here. We want "Jurco, Pulkkinen, Mantha" to do well this year right? Well Its not Miller's Job those guys are after. So I really don't see this as a conflict to our young players. I prefer Miller over "Nosek" or "Callahan" Miller is clearly better than these guys. And makes less than last year.
Miller took a pay cut here. Thats a big deal.
Like the signing.
Have to disagree that he's still developing. He did that under Datsyuk's tutelage, for the most part. He's 29. That's on the old side, almost sliding down part for a forward. He's as good now as he will ever be, and I somehow doubt with Dats gone that he will be more than a 40 pt guy, at best.
How is Ericsson's cap hit great now? He has been abysmal literally every year since his contract started.
It's horrendous now, so imagine how it looks in two years. He is barely qualified to play on the third pairing.
Gator's contract is going to end up being equally abysmal.
One bad contract can be worked around. Multiple bad contracts can't be ignored.
We all know where YOU stand WW1987. I don't think I ever said his contract was good. I said I "THINK" Holland signed him longer term to "lower his AAV". I also said I thought that was a mistake. But we can clearly see Holland favors longer deals with cheap AAV vs shorter deals.
I was never arguing Ericsson was good, just HOLLAND's thinking on it.
We all know where YOU stand WW1987. I don't think I ever said his contract was good. I said I "THINK" Holland signed him longer term to "lower his AAV". I also said I thought that was a mistake. But we can clearly see Holland favors longer deals with cheap AAV vs shorter deals.
I was never arguing Ericsson was good, just HOLLAND's thinking on it.
Ericsson's cap hit, when signed, was actually good. Not great, but good. Again, term is the killer. Same goes for Howard. And I think Abdelkader to come.
It's a running theme. The cap hits aren't bad, just too long. But Holland is big on keeping his band together. He's yet to move anybody, he's got an offer in on Helm, and Miller is coming back.
Quincey is probably finally gone, but that's after he traded to get him back and signed him to 2 more contracts. Quincey is the only decent player he's let walk since Hudler. Filppula, like Helm, was offered a deal, too.
Pretty unusual guys who are regulars don't get offers. I can only think of those 2 over the last how many years.