To allude to my point, Larkins won almost as many face-offs as Compher or Copp have taken. (Almost literally it's off by some) Clearly the pressure draws are being put on Larkin, Trocheck, imo, idk if it's a fact, could alleviate some of those duties/pressure allowing Larkin to perform more consistently with better on ice match ups against him.
I'd try something like this and see how the 5on5 matchups were on game-by-game basis before stacking the top line with my best face-off men. Getting Trocheck and using him 5on5 in the draw circle, plus his offense, imo, should let the coach cherry pick Larkins matchups on ice a little more in game.
Marco Kasper – Dyland Larkin – Lucas Raymond
Alex Debrincat – Andrew Copp – Patrick Kane
Emmitt Finnie – Vincent Trocheck – Elmer Soderblom
Michael Rasmussen – J.T. Compher – James van Riemsdyk
Mason Appleton
Just my opinion. I don't think you make a move on Trocheck thinking you acquired an offensive juggernaut or anything, I see most his value on face-offs, physicality and his two-way game. Allowing our skilled guys to play a more skilled type of game.
Fair, and that's how I'd want it ideally, too.
He only played 7 games in 19-20, but since then has only missed 24 games in 6 seasons.
good catch. I eyeballed his statline and didn't realize he had seasons broken up when he was dealt. He has had a really good run with NYR on the health front.
If we trade a 1st for Trocheck, and he doesn’t slot above Copp in the lineup, then wtf are we doing…
Well, right now the second line is working - do we want to screw with it? And if the first line starts working, do we want to screw with it? If we're playing Trocheck at center, sliding him into that 3C spot for the rest of the year doesn't mess with things that are working, and could help provide the scoring depth we have lacked.
Could the second line be better with Trocheck? maybe, but will the third line be better sliding Copp down to it? Unless things are going south for the team, I'd want to avoid throwing everything into a blender.

