Proposal: Red Wings offer-sheets Pettersson for 13 million
- Thread starter Henkka
- Start date
brentashton
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2018
- 14,660
- 21,232
I’d rather offer sheet Brady Tkachuk and probably would need to be at that price on a one year deal to pry either one free.
ToasterStutzle
Registered User
Yzerman should be fired. That’s all.
4x 1sts?
I'm pretty sure Vancouver takes that and laughs as they grab one of Bedard/Wright.
Seems Milbury-esque.
I'm pretty sure Vancouver takes that and laughs as they grab one of Bedard/Wright.
Seems Milbury-esque.
Yzerman would be fired. Great player but not even close to the best in the league.
Henkka
Registered User
you could offer sheet at 8.1 and screw them over signing him and Hughes. Less compensation if it works.
HyperX
Fire Ruff and co. !
- Jul 21, 2021
- 1,917
- 1,313
It would never work though
they wouldnt let him walk for 8.1m. Theyd sooner move Hughes I think
Nemesis Prime
Registered User
Henkka
Registered User
They won't be in the Bottom10 when adding Pettersson and Seider. Mostly are pushing for the playoffs.
Steeler23
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2004
- 1,022
- 1,041
At this point, if you offer 13M, why just 1 year? Kotkaniemi deal was about proving himself and letting him walk if he sucks and he doesn't want to sign under his QO. That's a risk you can take for a 1st + 3rd. Not for 4x1st round from a rebuilding team.
Sweetpotato
Registered User
Moose and Squirrel
Registered User
- Jan 15, 2021
- 3,685
- 2,703
Prairie Habs
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2010
- 12,143
- 13,149
Even with those guys Detroit would be nowhere near the playoffs
HabsAddict
Registered User
You offer sheet to add to a team, not when you are rebuilding.
If the Habs or other mid teams did it, it makes sense. Their 1sts would be in the late teens and 20s. Which ov course is impossible because those teams don't have cap space.,
If the Habs or other mid teams did it, it makes sense. Their 1sts would be in the late teens and 20s. Which ov course is impossible because those teams don't have cap space.,
Last edited:
I dunno… I think Vancouver would probably match…
It’s not about the value, it would take us years to fill the hole that losing Pettersson would create. If we lose him we might as well trade Horvat and Miller too and go full rebuild. It wouldn’t be worth it.
It’s not about the value, it would take us years to fill the hole that losing Pettersson would create. If we lose him we might as well trade Horvat and Miller too and go full rebuild. It wouldn’t be worth it.
As somebody who doesn't really have any ill will towards the wings I would cheer for them to pick first next year
Syckle78
Registered User
As nicely as I can put this,this is dumb as shit. Let's give up 4 1sts to have to most overpaid player in the league by a mile woooo.
Henkka
Registered User
He would be overpaid only for 1 year and then the long extension is made with normal reasonable caphit, like 8M.
Point is to get the guy.
4 x first round pick could a pipeline of "Svechnikov, Cholowski, Rasmussen, Zadina".
Steeler23
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2004
- 1,022
- 1,041
And he will magically just accept 8M long term when he have a QO of 13M? And you can't negociate this extension before January or something like that, so that's a *** big risk.
Henkka
Registered User
Risk yeah, but everything is negotiable.
You guys seem to always fear the worst.
It's peanuts for Yzerman to negotiate the 2nd deal.
HabsAddict
Registered User
Patterson can actually skate...and doesn't fall down in passing breezes....
I'm not sure I'd want to trade Suzuki for him without seeing two more years of Suzuki, but Petterson is a top 20 center.
