Henkka
Registered User
Rs can retain some
3-year deal for Trouba would be worth ~5.7M if he would sign today.
So if Rangers will retain 2.3M (29%), he will meet his current value.
Rs can retain some
not sure exactly how that was calculated, but seems close enuf3-year deal for Trouba would be worth ~5.7M if he would sign today.
So if Rangers will retain 2.3M (29%), he will meet his current value.
Confusing, originally asking for a RD, but trying to move a LD in Chiarot.Launching Chiarot out of a cannon to open up a roster spot.
We saw Gudas and Schenn get big money this off-season, so I think there is value for a team if Detroit retained 1+ mil on Chiarot’s contract in a trade.
Is Murphy better than Chiarot?
He was LD in Sweden and mostly LD in Grand Rapids.
I know CBJ was trash last season, but Peeke’s numbers look terribad. Is he a guy that would be a steady partner for a puck mover?
Albert Johansson has mostly played RD. That is what he prefers.
Trouba would get at least 6.5 on the open market.3-year deal for Trouba would be worth ~5.7M if he would sign today.
So if Rangers will retain 2.3M (29%), he will meet his current value.
Disagree on Peeke. He might be able to "play" on a 2nd pair on some teams, but he's not a #4 D at this point. he's a bottom pair guy. Maybe with consistent usage on a good team he can get to be a true #4. But right now if he's your 2nd best RD you probably aren't very good.Peeke got forced into #1 minutes last year on a bad team, so his numbers rightfully look terrible, but he’s very well suited for a defensive #4 role, and he’s still young (25) and signed for a few more years (2.75 x 3). And Columbus has a lot of pieces that could make him expendable. Boqvist, Bean, and Blankenburg also would be available but don’t quite fit the description as well.
What are you offering up for a RD, gives us an idea how much you’ll get back.
It matters because he plays better on the right.Doesn't really matter what he prefers as long as he shoots left.
It matters because he plays better on the right.
Are the rangers going to trade him after one season of being named captain?Trouba is your man. Home town hero.
As a CBJ fan you’re probably right. I think Peeke’s perception is dependent on his D partner. If you expect him to lead the breakout out of the Dzone, yeah you’re screwed. If you want him to stay home and pass the puck to an OFD, he has a chance.Disagree on Peeke. He might be able to "play" on a 2nd pair on some teams, but he's not a #4 D at this point. he's a bottom pair guy. Maybe with consistent usage on a good team he can get to be a true #4. But right now if he's your 2nd best RD you probably aren't very good.
Of course not. Nothing discussed on this trade forum reflects reality.Are the rangers going to trade him after one season of being named captain?
I still think they pay to get rid of goodrow if they need the space to resign laf
Just get him for second and future considerationTrouba is your man. Home town hero.
There's this guy potentially out there on the trade market named Brett Pesce.....thoughts?
Way to small for not having the lateral quickness to survive in a series against teams like Ottawa over the next 10 years in the Atlantic Division. Wouldn’t last 2 games, withstanding the beating he would take before he was injured skating with his head down like he does….Hronek for a 1st+2nd
Way to small for not having the lateral quickness to survive in a series against teams like Ottawa over the next 10 years in the Atlantic Division. Wouldn’t last 2 games, withstanding the beating he would take before he was injured skating with his head down like he does….
Wings are not in the position to be going after a guy who will be 29 a month into the season and is an expiring UFA. I probably wouldn't want to be extending him either after seeing what Severson got. Wings need to be going younger than that