Petes2424
Registered User
- Aug 4, 2005
- 8,563
- 3,443
Unfortunately the two kids are always going to be compared because the Canucks are viewed (unfairly btw) as having “passed on ASP” and drafted the “bigger kid”, who was the “late riser”, in the middle of a “growth spurt.” Who was rising on more than a few draft boards.The developmental curves of Willander and ASP are fun to follow. Obviously a few years away from finding out what was the best path. Willander learning the NA game but playing against weak competition in the aggregate. ASP playing against top non-NHL competition and dominating but obviously not learning the NA game.
Not all though, which is an interesting story for another day…
The inferiority complex in the Vancouver hockey media doesn’t help with the inevitable comparisons we’ve seen over the last 18 months.. A media who constantly props up the team’s prospects, as if they work for the team, and if that means taking shots at other kids like ASP in comparison, they’ve no problems doing that as well.
Unfortunately it leads to fans being confused when they see a game like yesterday’s. They’ve been led to believe Willander is in the same ballpark as ASP, and other D prospects around the league, who’ve taken some pretty big steps over the last 12 months. This is a big tournament for Willander to make a statement like we seen a Cayden Price and Andrew Gibson make tonight.
Let’s be honest with ourselves though. The entire Willander/ASP rivalry thing, created in the VAN media is ridiculous to begin with.
ASP was likely NEVER in the Canucks plans. They never chose Willander over ASP. They chose him over whatever forwards, Bonk, Molyndyk, etc. As much as they needed a stud dman in their system, there was no way, they were ever drafting Sandin-Pellikka.
They simply couldn’t afford having their top 3 Dmen, all being of the smaller variety. Unfortunately that growth spurt Willinder was having his draft year, stopped in its tracks as well. It’s funny, most VAN fans have this strange assumption he’s like 6’3 210lbs. Not his reality at 6’1”, 180lbs.
Whatever the case today, on draft night, the Canucks looked at ASP as another small dman, they just couldn’t afford to take. So there was no reason to ever breakdown any comparisons between the two.
In a perfect world ASP would’ve already been off the board when the Canucks drafted Willinder. Just so the Canucks would never have to answer for passing on an elite player, if that’s how this all turns out. Or even on days like today, when it was very apparent there’s a pretty large gap between the two young dmen. There’s no talking around it at this point. We’ll see where things are in 4-5 years but Willinder is likely NEVER going to be much offensively, and for him to end up being an effective NHL Top 4 Dman, he’s gonna have to be more confident handling the puck, and obviously start putting on some weight and muscle.
That all said, whether Willinder ever becomes a great Top 4 dman, or ASP goes on to be Sergei Zubov on steroids, ASP was very likely, never in the cards for the Canucks.
It’s also why we’re never going to get honest opinions about Willinder’s development from the Vancouver media either. God forbid they ever admit he’s not on par with ASP. He’s still a good prospect though. He deserves his props but let’s also not pretend. Kids like ASP, Bonk, Molyndyk, Price, Gibson, etc, have all passed him up. Some pretty significantly. All drafted after him.
As for his game, it is funny you mention ASP and the NA Game. We were watching specifically that part of his game today, and seen nothing to suggest it’s even an afterthought at this point. The group I was watching with, all came to the same conclusion really. He’s played so many games on smaller ice, and his decision making is so quick and spot-on, it’s a non factor. We walked out very impressed with where he’s at.
Not sure how much he works with Kronwall and/or Fischer, but his game is very NHL influenced. As is Anton Johansson’s btw. Who at 20, is also very well coached as one of their other D prospects in Sweden. I know ASP has worked a lot with Pierre Johnson, a defensive coach in Sweden, but other than that, from everything I understand, most of his hockey sense came from his dad, and just his commitment to the game. He knew early on, if you can walk the blue line, it opens your game up considerably in the offensive zone.
Will he have an oops on an angle here and there? Probably. He’s 19. He thinks the game at such a high level though, it’ll be very minimal, if he has any issues at all. If he ends up playing with Simon Edvinsson as people think, the sky is gonna be the limit. He’s gonna have lots of ice to do his thing.
Detroit has to be very happy with where he’s at right now. Maybe they knew exactly how far he’s already developed and that’s why they didn’t go get Edvinsson a partner this year. I don’t care how good you are as a dman, it’s not everyday we see a kid dominate a game from the backend in this tournament. He did that in all phases today. As good as Schaefer and Gibson were tonight in Canada’s game, they didn’t dominate individually.
Unfortunately his expectations for the rest of this tournament just went through the roof. After watching how good Canada was tonight, it’s their tournament to lose. How good was Andrew Gibson and Matthew Schaefer btw? Just not sure Sweden has the horses to matchup with that squad. Even with 6 of their 7 Dmen being NHL draft picks already. A few unexpected Swedes are gonna have to step up and make a name for themselves. Willander and Lindstein are gonna have to take their overall game to a whole new level for Sweden to have a shot at this tournament. Some of their roster decisions still very perplexing, but for them to have any chance, Willander and Lindstein are gonna have to step up and perform like Canada’s kids did vs Finland. You’re gonna see teams concentrate on taking ASP out of games now, so the pressure is on Willander and Lindstein for sure.