GDT: Ratelle Night

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Status
Not open for further replies.
At no point is allowing a shot ever better than not allowing a shot.
No kidding, but you are setting up an impossible dichotomy where the defenseman has total control over the play and can always choose to not allow a shot. Sometimes the only play he has is to try to force the shooter to take a less dangerous shot. It's not a matter of making the perfect play, which in this scenario is not allowing the shot, but making the best available play at that time.
 
Watching the Rangers, it's amazing how far they really are from being a good team. On paper it doesn't seem that bad, but man are they hard to watch.
 
No kidding, but you are setting up an impossible dichotomy where the defenseman has total control over the play and can always choose to not allow a shot. Sometimes the only play he has is to try to force the shooter to take a less dangerous shot. It's not a matter of making the perfect play, which in this scenario is not allowing the shot, but making the best available play at that time.

I completely understand that sometimes the defenseman has no choice. Sometimes forcing low danger is the only play.

O'Gara had a choice and made a conscious decision to allow a shot. Defensemen should never do that.
 
At no point is allowing a shot ever better than not allowing a shot.

Actually, that's also not true. If you have a team tiring you out in your zone and they take a stupid shot, your goalie can either cover it or they give up possession. I've seen this happen a bunch. An ill-advised shot deflects off the goalie into the crowd or out of the zone and allows for a change of possession or a change in lines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad