Just Linda
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2018
- 6,835
- 6,817
I quite like the player, I quite like the contract.
In 2 years, might be the right time to get him as a UFA. I don't see much point spending a ton of assets on a player who will be UFA before the Habs window.
I mean, noone is assuming he'll sign in Montreal but that's the exact argument I was making why the Habs shouldn't trade for him, cause there's a 1/32 chance he'll be on the Habs in 2 years when they are hoping to be in their window.I love these posters that just assume said player will sign with there team when he has 31 other options.
I mean, noone is assuming he'll sign in Montreal but that's the exact argument I was making why the Habs shouldn't trade for him, cause there's a 1/32 chance he'll be on the Habs in 2 years when they are hoping to be in their window.
Not worth it, to take a risk like that, for the cost Flames should get.That's what the trade and the two years are for...
We not 3 years off. Hope to challenge for playoff spot this season. Make it in '26.Montreal's window probably doesn't open for another three or so seasons. So I'm not sure that Andersson fits the logical timeline when factoring in acquisition cost.
The Habs are better off letting things play out and developing their prospects with favorable icetime. They're not all going to hit and some will need to be moved for these types of established pieces in future years.
The biggest hole right now is the lack of a true #1 center and more often than not, competitive teams get that from the draft.
Considering two thirds of your projected RD next season have played a combined 0 games to date in the NHL, I'd think that your estimates are a tad optimistic.We not 3 years off. Hope to challenge for playoff spot this season. Make it in '26.
At deadline, if Flames out of playoff picture. Would Flames take couple of vets they could trade for firsts?
Guhle can play either side well. Savard is there. Barron be third right D. Reinbacher and Mailloux will push 2 of them out by trade deadline.Considering two thirds of your projected RD next season have played a combined 0 games to date in the NHL, I'd think that your estimates are a tad optimistic.
There's a good chance that Montreal could take a step back this season considering all of the Sens, Sabres and Red Wings are theoretically ahead of them in terms of building a competitive roster.
If I'm Montreal, my 1st is going nowhere for the next few seasons. Those are possible lottery picks.
I think you need to work on your math here. If Montreal challenges for a playoff spot this season that does not mean they are entering their compete window. If you are a team that finishes top of your division or make it to the 3rd round you are entering your window. Montreal is absolutely about 3 years out from that.Guhle can play either side well. Savard is there. Barron be third right D. Reinbacher and Mailloux will push 2 of them out by trade deadline.
Experts are predicting us challenge for playoff berth
We're in a NHL2000 fantasy trade loop where NO is not an answer so the next unrealistic proposal pops up.This Habs fans doesn't want to propose anything. Habs are fine with the D we have and we need to let the process play out.
Maybe we are searching for a missing part later but that is a bridge we will cross when we get there.
trade the vets for picks and prospects first and comeback with a future based offer.At deadline, if Flames out of playoff picture. Would Flames take couple of vets they could trade for firsts?
Horrible value to Calgary.What about Flo/Cgy '25 pick + Justin Barron + Beck/Kapanen?
Why post when you know nothing about the players offered. A 1st, a potential top 4 d and 2 elite 3rd line centres (who may have 2c potential). A 1st, Barron and say Kidney/Farrell would be a fair offer.Horrible value to Calgary.
A waiver player, low 1st and B+ prospect for one of the NHLs best defensive contracts and a guy Habs play top pair day one.
Barron's "potential" on being a top 4 dman at this point is very low. Sure it could happen but highly unlikely. Beck is decent and projects nicely as a 2-way 3C caliber player but Kapanen is definitely a few steps below himWhy post when you know nothing about the players offered. A 1st, a potential top 4 d and 2 elite 3rd line centres (who may have 2c potential). A 1st, Barron and say Kidney/Farrell would be a fair offer.
NHLtraderumours is not a reliable source and that's the only place it seems to be mentionedI saw some rumour he was going to Tampa for a 2026 1st, Perbix and Sheary for Anderson 1.6M retained
Here’s a fire extinguisher for ya……..your flames are showing!!fun one.
Andsersson for Savard (TDL value) + Anderson (2026 TDL value/cap dump negative value) + Mailloux + Beck + 2025 1st (top 2 protection)+ Mesar + 2nd.
This is a trade the Flames have to win to make. Otherwise there is no incentive to make it.
Savard brings back at least a 2nd in 2025 when he’s traded at the deadline.
Another sad joke of an offer from a Habs fan.Why post when you know nothing about the players offered. A 1st, a potential top 4 d and 2 elite 3rd line centres (who may have 2c potential). A 1st, Barron and say Kidney/Farrell would be a fair offer.
You will be giving it back when Calgary picks in the top 10 so noHabs offer Flames their first back? Be around 15th
As usual... Habs badly overvaluing their players. Beck is again in the minors. Mailloux has some of the worst analytics of any NHL defender this year. They are both doing pretty well in the AHL, but at the end of the day... No one cares if you're good in the AHL if you can't also be good in the NHL.Why post when you know nothing about the players offered. A 1st, a potential top 4 d and 2 elite 3rd line centres (who may have 2c potential). A 1st, Barron and say Kidney/Farrell would be a fair offer.