Rantanen vs Necas points race to end of season.

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
I can understand if he isn’t great, but he has to be a lot better than this or Huberdeau comparisons become legit in a hurry. That’s another guy who “found his game” after a year or so, and it turned out his game is actually being a 55-point guy when he’s not on a line with superstars.
These comments have got me thinking. Is there a difference between an elite player and one with elite skills? You look at guys like Hughes, McDavid, Draisatl, MacKinnon, Crosby Makar, Matthews and they can take over a game. Clearly they are elite in that sense in addition to having elite skills. But does having an elite skill make you an elite player? How do you define elite? Those guys aren’t traded. They stay with the organization that drafted them. They don’t just have elite skills, those are the guys that we look to to be the guy when needed. IOW, clutch. They’re a great value for what they bring. And they can be productive in different scenarios whether it’s offense, defense, two way play or at least not a constant liability. We don’t question their motivation to be the best they can on the ice. With Rants, I question his motivation/effort on ice and ability to be a dynamic offensive force. Rants is a great player with elite skills. But to do that, it appears he needs to be in the right situation to employ those elite skills to full effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey
These comments have got me thinking. Is there a difference between an elite player and one with elite skills? You look at guys like Hughes, McDavid, Draisatl, MacKinnon, Crosby Makar, Matthews and they can take over a game. Clearly they are elite in that sense in addition to having elite skills. But does having an elite skill make you an elite player? How do you define elite? Those guys aren’t traded. They stay with the organization that drafted them. They don’t just have elite skills, those are the guys that we look to to be the guy when needed. IOW, clutch. They’re a great value for what they bring. And they can be productive in different scenarios whether it’s offense, defense, two way play or at least not a constant liability. We don’t question their motivation to be the best they can on the ice. With Rants, I question his motivation/effort on ice and ability to be a dynamic offensive force. Rants is a great player with elite skills. But to do that, it appears he needs to be in the right situation to employ those elite skills to full effect.

As with so many other things, extraordinary talent is only meaningful when it’s paired with high effort. For professional athletes in particular, even a slight slip on effort is enough for a guy with slightly less talent to prevail. Rantanen’s been on the wrong end of that on a lot of shifts lately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flyfysher
but comments from Ismo Lekhonen may point to this lackadaisical nature carries over from the work he puts in during the off season.

This comes up fairly often in English based discussions. Seems to me that there is a misunderstanding as to what Ismo actually said.

Im a Finn so I can tell you that he didn't call Mikko lazy as some other people seem to think. Actually he did say the opposite: that Mikko had too much other stuff going during that particular summer break: world championships, junior camp, small events etc. He said Mikko is bad at saying no to others.

He did another interiew where he clarified his view because people got him wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey
This comes up fairly often in English based discussions. Seems to me that there is a misunderstanding as to what Ismo actually said.

Im a Finn so I can tell you that he didn't call Mikko lazy as some other people seem to think. Actually he did say the opposite: that Mikko had too much other stuff going during that particular summer break: world championships, junior camp, small events etc. He said Mikko is bad at saying no to others.

He did another interiew where he clarified his view because people got him wrong.
Thank you. But Ismo didn’t make these observations about Rantanen not giving his full effort on a continuing basis. I did as an Avs fan from watching his play. And there were lots of Avs fans that feel the exact same way about Rants play for the Avs.
 

Ad

Ad