Rantanen vs Necas points race to end of season.

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
its so funny to me that as avs fans that we'd try Necas at 2C first before just putting Necas as the 2RW with Mitts as the 2C.

Mitts needs to produce and having a play driver like Necas could be the spark he needs. Mitts has yet to play with a shoot first speedster on his wing. I can see Mitts processing the game around that and setting him up for some great plays
 
Necas' lifetime FOW% of 41% suggests he'd struggle at C in one of the main things C is asked to do. As for his entries, he's a bit schizophrenic. He *can* be really really good, or he *often* gets in but then challenges 3-4 guys at once, tries some dipsy doo stuff and turns it over, or attempts (poorly) some pass to a guy who can't catch it or anticipate it. $3 might be better on the Avs - the Canes seem to have a team disease of not being exceptionally good passers or even puck handlers, for that matter.
 
`I know Canes fans have told us Necas at C doesn’t work but I want to try it for a few games anyways. His capabilities at zone entry is undeniable and from what I recall the knock from fans was that he didn’t use his linemates. Here, he’s been spectacular at that so maybe with the change of scenery and the presumed bump in confidence in having fit in immediately, I think it makes a lot of sense to at least try it.

If they can find a way to successfully separate MacKinnon and Necas, the Avs forward depth is very good.

His points might take a hit but the team depth would be much better off, and having two lines with speedsters like that will make it hard for opponents to defend.
😍
 
Well you’re following all my posts around like a little puppy dog with your laugh reactions so thought you would want to be included. Bring you in from the cold so you don’t have to have your nose pressed up against the window
Hahahaha, buddy I'm reading all of the posts in this thread, and some of yours just happen to be funny to me. I've never seen a poster be more melodramatic about a couple emojis in all of my years here
 
its so funny to me that as avs fans that we'd try Necas at 2C first before just putting Necas as the 2RW with Mitts as the 2C.

Mitts needs to produce and having a play driver like Necas could be the spark he needs. Mitts has yet to play with a shoot first speedster on his wing. I can see Mitts processing the game around that and setting him up for some great plays
I think that’s a great alternative to try as well, but both those alternatives should be tried imo.
 
Yes, there are series where we got goalied, but there are series where we didn't. And you also have to look at the idea that maybe we didn't get goalied as much as we thought and perhaps our players just didn't execute as well as they should have. I'm sure it's a bit of both.

We have often taken the position that scoring is what has let us down in the playoffs and not the goaltending matchups. Perhaps it is a bit of bad timing in that the series that when he got 'goalied' our goalies were generally good as well and then in the series where our forwards did score more, our goalies didn't shut the door. That's the playoffs though. At the end of the day you have to find a way to get it done.

This is why I think it would give us a lot of perspective if we looked at the goalies’ PK saves and save% in those series. If the volume of shots is going down, that signals a fall-off of offensive effectiveness by the skaters. If the volume stays the same but save% is way over average, while it’s possible that a dozen different skaters are suddenly taking terrible shots, it’s a lot more likely that the goalie is just playing really well. Especially since Rod’s PP system puts so much emphasis on screened shots from the point, which would seem to have little variance in quality.

Without having the data in front of me, just based on the eye test and the fact that we’re talking about peak performance from three of the best goalies of their generation, my guess is that the Canes generated plenty of shot volume during those PPs but were stymied by goalies stopping everything thrown at them (certainly that was the case with Bobrovsky who was superhuman in that series).
 
  • Like
Reactions: GIN ANTONIC
Necas as a C has been debated on the Canes board to death. It is true that we have not seen it implemented for any meaningful time the circumstantial evidence has led us to believe that Necas doesn't quite have the right play style to excel there.

Pros
- Speed
- Zone entries
- Good at puck possession
- Gives lots of effort

Cons
- Bad at faceoffs
- Does not always use teammates to the best of their ability (but showing big improvement there this year)
- Lone wolf mentality and can be hard for his teammates to predict or anticipate
- Not defensively aware (focuses on offense almost solely)
- Can find himself out of position

Now could Necas be an effective C at the NHL level? Sure. His skillset is elite but he would probably have to change his approach to the game and maybe that takes away from what makes him great at what he does.

To a lot of us he seems to be perfectly cast as an offensive winger with high end skills to back that up.
 
Necas is a puck hungry 5 on 5 wizard that can carry non superstars.

But he’s never carried anyone before, which is a big part of why he was traded in the first place.

A version of Necas who carries his linemates, rather than ignoring them, would be very different than the Necas we have seen to date. He has thrived as a playmaker in a short stint next to MacKinnon, but that’s very different from doing the same long term next to Mittelstadt.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad