Post-Game Talk: Rangers vs. Lightning 02/27/19 - 7:30 EST

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.

3 Players who performed well in this game


  • Total voters
    79
What is interference if that's not it? Vlad never had the puck, the puck carrier literally passed it then hit him.

Not terribly upset about not getting the extra point, but that was pretty ridiculous.
Actually you can view it from Kuch’s pov, and Namestikov was sort of following through on a hit on the puck carrier (Kuch), who had just released the pass. Smart play from Kucherov imo
 
Quick Maths.

Shattenkirk 6.65M + Smith 4.35M= Panarin $11M
makes me sick to my stomach. Smith sold us snake oil in those 2017 playoffs. Shatty just isn't that good. Doesn't inspire confidence for the future thats for sure
 
Actually you can view it from Kuch’s pov, and Namestikov was sort of following through on a hit on the puck carrier (Kuch), who had just released the pass. Smart play from Kucherov imo
He is elite. He completely designed that play. Purposely getting into names path and then dishing it
 
Actually you can view it from Kuch’s pov, and Namestikov was sort of following through on a hit on the puck carrier (Kuch), who had just released the pass. Smart play from Kucherov imo

A precedent if you will, Ovi trying to drill Malkin, and Malkin squared up, Ovi obliterated himself on that play.
 
As much as it pains me to say it, that’s not a penalty on Kucherov. He had the puck so the argument could be that Names went to hit him but Names is the one who went down. It’s a bang bang play and since Kucherov had the puck it’s not interference. If Kucherov got rid of the puck a second or two sooner or if he didn’t have the puck then it’s an interference penalty.
 
He looks every bit the stud he projected to be coming out of juniors. And good on Quinn playing him big time mins. Kid eats it up.

I think he’s a legit first pairing dman who’s going to just get better and better.

He doesn't pass the puck. He literally slings it
 
  • Like
Reactions: romba

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad