No joke, this organization could desperately use an in-his-prime Girardi. If Lindgren could become that it's a f***ing home run.You bite your forked tongue.
No joke, this organization could desperately use an in-his-prime Girardi. If Lindgren could become that it's a f***ing home run.You bite your forked tongue.
Sorry. I don't mean to start the whole analytics vs. eye-test thing.RIP this thread
All good. I'll try to start a "is Stepan a #1 center?" debate to distract.Sorry. I don't mean to start the whole analytics vs. eye-test thing.
Agreed. Plus, he seems better moving the puck than G. A lot of people tend to think puck skills with d-men are a binary where they're either offensive d-man who can score 40 points or they're defensive d-men who can't exit the zone without banking it off the glass. Modern defensive types may not put up tons of points, but they can exit the zone quickly and distribute the puck without constantly turning it over. If he can do that, shut down other teams scorers and throw his weight around, that's a huge win no matter how many points he scores.No joke, this organization could desperately use an in-his-prime Girardi. If Lindgren could become that it's a ****ing home run.
nyr2k2 pls, people will actually believe thisHe was just added to the Pack's roster, wearing number 5. The new Girardi.
Do you mean before they reach the NHL, or while they're in the NHL? If you mean, in the NHL, I can't agree. Stralman had 38 points in 3 seasons as a Rangers and I don't think anyone viewed him that way. I do tend to be quick to dismiss low point total defensemen in juniors and college as not likely to competent puck-movers at the NHL level, though.Agreed. Plus, he seems better moving the puck than G. A lot of people tend to think puck skills with d-men are a binary where they're either offensive d-man who can score 40 points or they're defensive d-men who can't exit the zone without banking it off the glass. Modern defensive types may not put up tons of points, but they can exit the zone quickly and distribute the puck without constantly turning it over. If he can do that, shut down other teams scorers and throw his weight around, that's a huge win no matter how many points he scores.
I mean in the NHL and to many fans that are closer to casual fans than consistent HF posters.Do you mean before they reach the NHL, or while they're in the NHL? If you mean, in the NHL, I can't agree. Stralman had 38 points in 3 seasons as a Rangers and I don't think anyone viewed him that way. I do tend to be quick to dismiss low point total defensemen in juniors and college as not likely to competent puck-movers at the NHL level, though.
All good. I'll try to start a "is Stepan a #1 center?" debate to distract.
Talbot + cap space!!!!Is Lundqvist overpaid?
All I ask is that Ranger fans be patient with him.
High character kid. Love his attitude and play style.
He's not going to be a corsi friendly guy.
IMO my comparison for him is Radko Gudas minus the dirty hits every 5 games.
Likes him a lot in the WJC. He and Lias should be kids that they try to integrate next year in a leadership role. Probably not going to play much in the NHL but I'd like to see him be that primary shutdown option in HFD.
I actually think he and ADA would make a good D pair.
Funny thing is, Gudas is actually quite "corsi friendly"
Let’s say worst case he’s Radko Gudas.Im really surprised (actually not) that some of you have an issue with this kids potential. Lets say worst case scenario he is a Radko Gudas type. (I think he will be a solid 4) that would mean we got him and Spooner and a first ( I’m not even counting Ogara who sucks) for two months less of Rick Nash. You guys being negative in any way shape or form about this kid are nuts. Period.
If he does turn into Girardi I would be ecstatic. G in his prime was a GREAT defender for us.