Atax
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2011
- 6,078
- 7,674
You're getting Holl, Detroit still has 7 defensemen.
Schneider moves up to 2RD. Holl fills a roll.
Just the way it is.
If the rangers retain and take back a contract they better be getting a 1st. Otherwise that’s not even worth it at that point. You would be clearing out 2M in cap space at that point.
Copp + 2.5 mil retained on Trouba = 8.125 mil. That's more than Trouba is making. And Copp has 3 years left to Trouba's 2. It's a non-starter.Man, this is exciting. It’s going to happen.
Now we brace ourselves for the return. If we are retaining I want something of value back. Not Holl. Maybe Copp.
Reality is, we can replace trouba with a league min guy like ruhwedel on 3rd pair until TDL.I wouldn't mind if we retained $2.5M and got nothing back. I think he has some value for sure, but the contract hurts and we're hamstrung by the fact we can't send him certain places.
Sometimes it's just best to make a clean break, and if it costs $2.5M to do so, I wouldn't be bothered by it.
If we are retaining salary Copp makes no sense. That’d be basically paying him 8.1 million.Man, this is exciting. It’s going to happen.
Now we brace ourselves for the return. If we are retaining I want something of value back. Not Holl. Maybe Copp.
I wouldn't mind if we retained $2.5M and got nothing back. I think he has some value for sure, but the contract hurts and we're hamstrung by the fact we can't send him certain places.
Sometimes it's just best to make a clean break, and if it costs $2.5M to do so, I wouldn't be bothered by it.
Right. I've always defended Jake but he was bad last year. Like, really bad. I understand he had injury issues but still. I think Drury understands that this team needs to make a couple big pivots to get over the jump and that Trouba probably isn't part. It would be wonderful to find a way to get rid of him while adding value, but the reality is it may not be in the cards. And if it's not, and you have to pay someone to take him, so be it.Reality is, we can replace trouba with a league min guy like ruhwedel on 3rd pair until TDL.
I'm of the same mind. The lineup flexibility that comes from ridding the player itself is a plus. The whole point is freeing up lineup space to have new jobs for people in addition to cap savings. Open up that cap to do something positive like getting a PMD rather than take one of Detroit's throwaway. Trouba I don't doubt is a great person and great for the league in terms of social responsibility and marketing but on the ice he was a liability.I wouldn't mind if we retained $2.5M and got nothing back. I think he has some value for sure, but the contract hurts and we're hamstrung by the fact we can't send him certain places.
Sometimes it's just best to make a clean break, and if it costs $2.5M to do so, I wouldn't be bothered by it.
What about Michael Rasmussen (RFA)?
If we are retaining, we should be getting value back, someone that can play now.
Good longer-term Chytil injury insurance policy.
Theyre not paying 5M for a 3rd rounder, that's bananas.I predict we get their 3rd round pick for $2.5m retained
I wasn't aware of that, so that's a no then. I don't know, I just looked over the roster and looked at his EV numbers and faceoff numbers. He looks like a good 3rd line center on paper. Don't know anything else.Detroit extended Rasmussen in February (4 years $3.2M AAV). I honestly haven't seen him play much. Is he worth that?