It is something they consider - with the idea being their parents supplemented they're training and the kids have an idea of what being a pro entails.
The issue I have is that it hasn't worked out well: Thomas, Borque, both Calle and Lias Anderssens, Sjellberg, and now Tarnstrom.
Ronning might be figuring it out at a later age. Does he go the JAM route or is he trade bait at this point?
It is time for a change in philosophy.
We'll see what Drury decides on. From every indication, it seems like Drury is highly scoping out his list by using analytics. Gorton used analytics, but ultimately used the "eye-test" to determine his lists. There's a lot that can be changed or won't be changed.
It is too early to tell on Sjellberg and Tarnstrom, but Thomas has had a successful career overseas. Calle Andersson has been a mainstay in the NLA (and his brother is a mainstay in the NHL). Lias is still figuring it out, might be able to make it as a bottom-6 center/wing with LA.
Bourque might be the only real disappointment...
The issue I have is that it hasn't worked out well: Thomas, Borque, both Calle and Lias Anderssens, Sjellberg, and now Tarnstrom.
Ronning might be figuring it out at a later age. Does he go the JAM route or is he trade bait at this point?
It is time for a change in philosophy.
I don't think its a philosophy per se, so much as bloodlines is something that is out there. Nobody cares when its Sauer or Staal or Stepan. It's not a guiding principle.
It can't be all analytics otherwise you're running 6 Adam Clenndennings on D or the Maple Leafs/Coyotes.
It's fine those guys have had great careers overseas but it's about the NHL game and factoring into how will they perform given the rink size, pace, physicality, being in a strange new land.
I know other stuff goes into it but it can't be the "oh he grew up with it because his dad was a pro". Even guys like Lemiuex and Namestnikov whose dad was in the Rangers organization for a bit......it's nice having two extra fourth rounders I guess.
Stepan's dad never made it to the pro game. Staal was at worst going to be a Jay McKee clone. He was a safe guaranteed pick and for a while he was better than McKee until the injuries and Stralman carrying him.
Sauer had an athletic family. I don't believe his father was an NHLer (his brother was). The issue with that pick was injury problems. He was excellent but other than 2010-11 he was always injured.
Was there a relegation winner for SHL/Allsvenkan? Heard HV71 got relegated and can't find any articles on it.
The point is it's not really philosophy or guiding principle.
Every team in the league has players like related to someone, just like us.
It can't be all analytics otherwise you're running 6 Adam Clenndennings on D or the Maple Leafs/Coyotes.
It can't be all analytics otherwise you're running 6 Adam Clenndennings on D or the Maple Leafs/Coyotes.
It's fine those guys have had great careers overseas but it's about the NHL game and factoring into how will they perform given the rink size, pace, physicality, being in a strange new land.
I know other stuff goes into it but it can't be the "oh he grew up with it because his dad was a pro". Even guys like Lemiuex and Namestnikov whose dad was in the Rangers organization for a bit......it's nice having two extra fourth rounders I guess.
Timrå beat Björklöven in the final to get promoted
Thank you, what about SHL relegation? Was HV71 the team being sent down?
I think the analytics in play here is far beyond any NHL GM simulator like bringing in "6 Clendenings" as you have perceived. Most teams have been going analytic-heavy in all sports, not just the Rangers and with Drury. Look at the Avalanche in this regard. Again, let's see what he can do before fully judging the mentality. Bloodlines do have their payoffs (see Kapanen, Domi, etc.), but like most drafts, it's all about trajectory and development. It's on the player and the team, regardless of their lineage.
There's a lot more to hockey than just the NHL, even though it's the top league in the whole world (and unintentionally the worst at the same time). Besides, most rinks in the KHL have NHL-sized rinks now. Think @Amazing Kreiderman can attest to that. With that being the case, the pace will be eerily the same as that of the NHL. Physicality is another story, but as most saw in the Gagarin Cup Playoffs, teams with the bigger grind will show up in big games. Yet another similar attribute to the Stanley Cup Playoffs.
Times are changing, for sure...
At the moment, only 2 teams (Dinamo Riga and Kunlun Red Star) are playing on Olympic regulation rinks as they were granted exception by the KHL. About 12 teams are on NHL sized rinks. The rest is currently transitioning from hybrid to NHL rinks in a process that takes 1-2 years
What a stupid comment lol
"All analytics" gets you teams like the Avalanche which are absolutely stomping the whole league
Why do you think goalie save percentages in the KHL are so absurdly high? The theory for many years was larger rinks lended to more lower percentage shots.
If you want to play hockey, at the very least you need a stick which costs a fortune compared to the equipment necessary in other sports.
Which NHL teams have drafted the best and worst since 2005?
Some key takeaways
-Rangers rank 18th in GSVA for their draft picks from 2005-2016 using only the first 7 years of results (less than 7 has been extrapolated to 7) (Washington and St Louis take #1 and #2, Canucks and Devils #29 and #30)
-Rangers rank 7th in outperforming their draft capital according to GSVA (the difference of wins provided by their picks v.s. the expected value of their picks)
-Rangers rank 3rd in draft performance outside of the 1st round (trailing only Tampa and Carolina)
As a reminder, GSVA is Dom L's statistic that means to be somewhat of a hockey stand-in for WAR.
Keep in mind these results do not include 2017 onwards, drafts of which I think would significantly increase the Rangers stock.