Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
I just don't see him making the Rangers, I think he should be included in a trade.
Is this based on the many games you've seen of Rykov?
I just don't see him making the Rangers, I think he should be included in a trade.
Hughes is a long shot. If he makes it he makes it and if he doesn't he doesn't. I would think at the very least he's going to need 2 years at Northeastern U. after this year and the probability is more than that--and maybe a year or two in the minors. So his landing in the NHL time if it happens will probably be around 24 or 25. At least he should be physically mature by then. If I were giving him advice I'd tell him to take the Carl Hagelin route---work on his skating, endurance and two way game. Guys entering the NHL at that age usually aren't going to be top 6 forwards.
I just don't see him making the Rangers, I think he should be included in a trade.
Every org needs guys to stack in the NCAA and come up as sprinkles later on. A lot of the Rangers success in the late 80s/early 90s is because they had an influx of NCAA guys come in and either contribute or were assets.
I looked into this over the last few years: find guys that are ~ppg USHL players in their draft year and have them go play college hockey. It’s how Pitt, Chicago, and Boston have had a constant influx of solid depth players that can play aggressive north-south games
Did have 9 SOG though, so that's super nice.Barron had nothing.
Based on what?
(I know it's based on pure xenophobia but i'm asking anyway)
Based on other LD prospects and players ahead of him on the depth chart.
(you know it is based on xenophobia? you should get checked for schizophrenia.)
Wow...Based on other LD prospects and players ahead of him on the depth chart.
(you know it is based on xenophobia? you should get checked for schizophrenia.)
The only way you can compare Rykov to other LD prospects, is if you actually watch him play. Which you most likely didn't do
What does the future of this defense look like to you?wrong again
Miller played last night and is playing again at 8pm EST tonightI don't post much
I hope Miller is playing this weekend. Him and Keane are very exciting defensive prospects. (Rykov too but he clearly has no future with the team)
Ok. Back to lurking.
What does the future of this defense look like to you?
Not sure, but Rykov I don't see part of it, it just reminds me of Valentenko, Kondratiev, Zborovskiy, Bereglazov, etc. They just don't really work out for us.
I’ll say this: his game is nothing like those other Russian defensemen you’ve listed. I don’t really want to get into where he fits in on the heirarchy of LD’s but I’m pretty sure Rykov has spent a decent amount of time on the right side. And he’s got as good of a chance as Hajek to make it, I don’t know why people think Lindgren is a great prospect and I’d put money on being able to totally write off Crawley soonNot sure, but Rykov I don't see part of it, it just reminds me of Valentenko, Kondratiev, Zborovskiy, Bereglazov, etc. They just don't really work out for us.
and with Staal here, Skjei, Smith, Hajek, Lindgren, Crowley, Day, Ragnarsson, Miller, Gross, etc. I just don't see it.
By the time he adjusts to NHL size rinks in AHL, Hajek, Lindgen and Crowley will fill out all the openings.
I’ll say this: his game is nothing like those other Russian defensemen you’ve listed. I don’t really want to get into where he fits in on the heirarchy of LD’s but I’m pretty sure Rykov has spent a decent amount of time on the right side. And he’s got as good of a chance as Hajek to make it, I don’t know why people think Lindgren is a great prospect and I’d put money on being able to totally write off Crawley soon
wrong again
Just curious, can you describe what it is about Rykov that reminds you of those players in particular?
How do you compare 2 players if you haven't seen one of them play?
He’s a two way guy, he’s good in his own end and a very good passer.Nobody can even agree what his game is, to me he is a defensive Dman, somebody claimed he is offensive Dman.
I like Crawley's and Lindgren's hard nose physical brand of hockey with good skating ability. I feel comfortable with them, they know how to play on smaller ice surfaces already. Rykov looked like somebody that they used to stay way back and then this season they decided they don't need him and sent him down and then traded him, so it doesn't look too good for him.
He’s a two way guy, he’s good in his own end and a very good passer.
You may like their style and feel comfortable with that kind of player, but these two specific players just aren’t that good. Rykov’s team wouldn’t play him because they have more defensemen than they Rangers and knew that Rykov isn’t a long term piece for them, he got traded and now he’s a top pairing guy getting 20+ minutes a night and playing well
How do you know they haven’t?I am sure Bereglazov was also playing over 20 minutes a game in KHL that doesn't really mean that much see Malik, Staal and Girardi. I am sure if Rykov is a really special player the SKA would have not only played him but tried hard to re-sign him, and Sochi should try to re-sign him if they think he is that great.
Based on what?
(I know it's based on pure xenophobia but i'm asking anyway)
Based on other LD prospects and players ahead of him on the depth chart.
(you know it is based on xenophobia? you should get checked for schizophrenia.)
Not sure, but Rykov I don't see part of it, it just reminds me of Valentenko, Kondratiev, Zborovskiy, Bereglazov, etc. They just don't really work out for us. Also Pashnin.
and with Staal here, Skjei, Smith, Hajek, Lindgren, Crowley, Day, Ragnarsson, Miller, Gross, etc. I just don't see it.
By the time he adjusts to NHL size rinks in AHL, Hajek, Lindgen and Crowley will fill out all the openings.